Literature DB >> 27098937

Robustness of movement models: can models bridge the gap between temporal scales of data sets and behavioural processes?

Ulrike E Schlägel1,2, Mark A Lewis3,4.   

Abstract

Discrete-time random walks and their extensions are common tools for analyzing animal movement data. In these analyses, resolution of temporal discretization is a critical feature. Ideally, a model both mirrors the relevant temporal scale of the biological process of interest and matches the data sampling rate. Challenges arise when resolution of data is too coarse due to technological constraints, or when we wish to extrapolate results or compare results obtained from data with different resolutions. Drawing loosely on the concept of robustness in statistics, we propose a rigorous mathematical framework for studying movement models' robustness against changes in temporal resolution. In this framework, we define varying levels of robustness as formal model properties, focusing on random walk models with spatially-explicit component. With the new framework, we can investigate whether models can validly be applied to data across varying temporal resolutions and how we can account for these different resolutions in statistical inference results. We apply the new framework to movement-based resource selection models, demonstrating both analytical and numerical calculations, as well as a Monte Carlo simulation approach. While exact robustness is rare, the concept of approximate robustness provides a promising new direction for analyzing movement models.

Keywords:  Animal movement; GPS data; Markov model; Parameter estimation; Resource selection; Sampling rate

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27098937     DOI: 10.1007/s00285-016-1005-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Math Biol        ISSN: 0303-6812            Impact factor:   2.259


  28 in total

Review 1.  Resolving issues of imprecise and habitat-biased locations in ecological analyses using GPS telemetry data.

Authors:  Jacqueline L Frair; John Fieberg; Mark Hebblewhite; Francesca Cagnacci; Nicholas J DeCesare; Luca Pedrotti
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  Are there general mechanisms of animal home range behaviour? A review and prospects for future research.

Authors:  Luca Börger; Benjamin D Dalziel; John M Fryxell
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 9.492

3.  The effect of sampling rate on observed statistics in a correlated random walk.

Authors:  G Rosser; A G Fletcher; P K Maini; R E Baker
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Mechanistic home range models and resource selection analysis: a reconciliation and unification.

Authors:  Paul R Moorcroft; Alex Barnett
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 5.499

5.  Flexible and practical modeling of animal telemetry data: hidden Markov models and extensions.

Authors:  Roland Langrock; Ruth King; Jason Matthiopoulos; Len Thomas; Daniel Fortin; Juan M Morales
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 5.499

6.  Large-scale navigational map in a mammal.

Authors:  Asaf Tsoar; Ran Nathan; Yoav Bartan; Alexei Vyssotski; Giacomo Dell'Omo; Nachum Ulanovsky
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-08-15       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Multi-trophic resource selection function enlightens the behavioural game between wolves and their prey.

Authors:  Nicolas Courbin; Daniel Fortin; Christian Dussault; Viviane Fargeot; Réhaume Courtois
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 5.091

8.  Fragmentation of the habitat of wild ungulates by anthropogenic barriers in Mongolia.

Authors:  Takehiko Y Ito; Badamjav Lhagvasuren; Atsushi Tsunekawa; Masato Shinoda; Seiki Takatsuki; Bayarbaatar Buuveibaatar; Buyanaa Chimeddorj
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Consequences of animal interactions on their dynamics: emergence of home ranges and territoriality.

Authors:  Luca Giuggioli; V M Kenkre
Journal:  Mov Ecol       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 3.600

10.  Predicting local and non-local effects of resources on animal space use using a mechanistic step selection model.

Authors:  Jonathan R Potts; Guillaume Bastille-Rousseau; Dennis L Murray; James A Schaefer; Mark A Lewis
Journal:  Methods Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 7.781

View more
  4 in total

1.  A framework for analyzing the robustness of movement models to variable step discretization.

Authors:  Ulrike E Schlägel; Mark A Lewis
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2016-02-06       Impact factor: 2.259

2.  Reptiles on the wrong track? Moving beyond traditional estimators with dynamic Brownian Bridge Movement Models.

Authors:  Inês Silva; Matt Crane; Benjamin Michael Marshall; Colin Thomas Strine
Journal:  Mov Ecol       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 3.600

3.  A random walk model that accounts for space occupation and movements of a large herbivore.

Authors:  Geoffroy Berthelot; Sonia Saïd; Vincent Bansaye
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Territory surveillance and prey management: Wolves keep track of space and time.

Authors:  Ulrike E Schlägel; Evelyn H Merrill; Mark A Lewis
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-09-09       Impact factor: 2.912

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.