Literature DB >> 24498570

Macrophages increase the resistance of pancreatic adenocarcinoma cells to gemcitabine by upregulating cytidine deaminase.

Moran Amit1, Ziv Gil1.   

Abstract

Tumor-associated macrophages play a central role in tumor progression and metastasis. Macrophages can also promote the resistance of malignant cells to chemotherapy by stimulating the upregulation of cytidine deaminase, an intracellular enzyme that catabolizes the active form of gemcitabine. Targeting macrophage-dependent chemoresistance may reduce tumor-associated morbidity and mortality.

Entities:  

Keywords:  chemotherapy; cytidine deaminase; gemcitabine; macrophages; pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma; resistance

Year:  2013        PMID: 24498570      PMCID: PMC3912006          DOI: 10.4161/onci.27231

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncoimmunology        ISSN: 2162-4011            Impact factor:   8.110


In the last decade, the role of the tumor microenvironment in the progression of stroma-rich pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) lesions has been increasingly understood. Early studies of hematological malignancies suggested that tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) can promote chemoresistance by directly interacting with malignant cells within the tumor microenvironment. It is now clear that TAMs can influence the response of cancer cells to chemotherapy in the context of a process known as environment-mediated drug resistance., Gemcitabine (dFdC), the chemotherapeutic agent most often employed for the treatment of PDA is metabolized intracellularly by deoxycytidine kinase (DCK) to the active metabolites dFdCDP and dFdCTP. Several mechanisms may be responsible for gemcitabine resistance: the loss of import via nucleoside transporters; the downregulation of DCK, the rate-limiting enzyme in the formation of bioactive gemcitabine metabolites the upregulation of cytidine deaminase (CDA), the enzyme that metabolizes gemcitabine to one of its inactive forms (dFdU); the upregulation of ribonucleotide reductases, which promote DNA synthesis by catalyzing the formation of deoxyribonucleotides from ribonucleotides; and the inhibition of caspases, the enzymes that execute the apoptotic demise of cancer cells as induced by gemcitabine. We have recently shown that TAMs stimulate chemoresistance by promoting the expression of CDA, the enzyme responsible for the inactivation of gemcitabine, by cancer cells (Fig. 1). Using TAM-conditioned medium, we observed a significant reduction in caspase-3 activation in malignant cells exposed to gemcitabine. The co-culture of TAMs and cancer cells had similar effect on gemcitabine-induced apoptosis than the exposure of the latter to TAM-conditioned medium, suggesting that one or more soluble factors secreted by TAMs mediate(s) this effect. In line with this finding, macrophage-depleted mice (be they Ccr2 animals or animals treated with clodronate-loaded liposomes) were more sensitive to the antineoplastic effects of gemcitabine than their wild-type counterparts. Similarly, in transgenic mice that spontaneously develop pancreatic carcinomas (owing to mutations in Kras and Trp53 expressed under the control of a pancreatic cell-specific promoter) the anticancer activity of gemcitabine was significantly improved by the co-administration of the colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF1R) antagonist GW2580.

Figure 1. Paracrine loop between endoneurial macrophages and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cells. Colony-stimulating factor 1 (CSF1) secreted by pancreatic cancer cells attracts endoneurial macrophages (EMΦs) that express the CSF1 receptor (CSF1R). EMΦs recruited to the tumor site are activated by cancer cells and stimulate them to express high levels of cytidine deaminase (CDA). By catabolizing the bioactive form of gemcitabine, CDA exerts consistent chemoprotective effects, hence reducing the susceptibility of cancer cells to chemotherapy.

Figure 1. Paracrine loop between endoneurial macrophages and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cells. Colony-stimulating factor 1 (CSF1) secreted by pancreatic cancer cells attracts endoneurial macrophages (EMΦs) that express the CSF1 receptor (CSF1R). EMΦs recruited to the tumor site are activated by cancer cells and stimulate them to express high levels of cytidine deaminase (CDA). By catabolizing the bioactive form of gemcitabine, CDA exerts consistent chemoprotective effects, hence reducing the susceptibility of cancer cells to chemotherapy. Real-time PCR analyses were used to evaluate the regulation of the multiple proteins involved in gemcitabine transport and metabolism, including gemcitabine transporters such as concentrative nucleoside transporter 1 (CNT1, official name SLC28A1) and equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1 (ENT1, official name SLC29A1); DCK; various ribonucleotide reductases, including ribonucleotide reductase M1 (RRM1) and RRM2; and CDA. These analyses demonstrated that TAM-conditioned medium induce a 75-fold increase in the expression levels of CDA observed in the presence of gemcitabine. The immunohistochemical assessment of CDA levels in vivo revealed that tumors growing in wild-type mice significantly upregulate CDA in response to gemcitabine, whereas neoplasms developing in Ccr2 mice (which lack macrophages) do so to limited extents. Macrophages depletion also resulted in increased caspase-3 activation (a marker of apoptotic cells death) and decreased Ki67 immunoreactivity (which is indicative of reduced proliferation rates) in gemcitabine-treated neoplastic lesions, correlating with limited CDA expression levels. Finally, we demonstrated that pancreatic cancer cells depleted of CDA by means of a specific small-interfering RNA were less sensitive to chemoprotective effects of TAM-conditioned medium. Our results demonstrate that paracrine signals delivered by the tumor microenvironment can be harnessed by cancer cells to maintain growth in spite of cytotoxic insults. Thus, tumor growth, progression and chemoresistance are supported by the tumor microenvironment, which provides a network of interactions between malignant cells and their stroma. A recent study revealed that the efficacy of anticancer drugs is markedly reduced when cancer cells are co-cultured with stromal cells. Macrophages, which account for a significant fraction of the tumor stroma, are recruited and activated by signals emitted by cancer cells. The first hint on the chemoprotective activity of macrophages was obtained in vitro, in breast cancer cells exposed to 6-thioguanine. Cathepsin-expressing macrophages can also blunt the efficacy of paclitaxel against breast carcinoma cells, both in co-culture experiments and in vivo. The authors of these studies suggested that macrophages promote chemotherapy resistance by impacting on cell-mediated antitumor immune response. Conversely, our findings point to the upregulation of intracellular proteins involved in the metabolism of chemotherapeutic agents as a major determinant of the chemoprotective activity of macrophages. Several factors released by macrophages may increase the resistance of cancer cells to gemcitabine. Data from a phosphorylation array covering 71 distinct tyrosine kinase receptors (Raybio, #AAH-PRTK-G1) performed on PANC-1 pancreatic carcinoma cells upon exposure to macrophage-condition medium revealed a significant increase in the phosphorylation levels of Janus kinase 1 (JAK1) and JAK3 (Gil and collaborators, unpublished data). Both JAK1 and JAK3 are activated by multiple cytokines, including interleukin-4 (IL-4), which is abundantly secreted by TAMs (Fig. 1). In summary, our study demonstrates for the first time that macrophages can increase the resistance of cancer cells to chemotherapy through the upregulation of CDA, an intracellular enzyme which catabolizes the active form of gemcitabine. The clinical significance of our findings is substantial, since targeting the chemoprotective effects of TAMs may improve the efficacy of chemotherapy, hence decreasing disease morbidity and prolonging the survival of cancer patients.
  10 in total

1.  Cancer: Macrophages limit chemotherapy.

Authors:  Michele De Palma; Claire E Lewis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-04-21       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Chemotherapy alters monocyte differentiation to favor generation of cancer-supporting M2 macrophages in the tumor microenvironment.

Authors:  Eveline M Dijkgraaf; Moniek Heusinkveld; Bart Tummers; Lisa T C Vogelpoel; Renske Goedemans; Veena Jha; Johan W R Nortier; Marij J P Welters; Judith R Kroep; Sjoerd H van der Burg
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  Macrophage-mediated induction of drug-resistant variants in a mouse mammary tumor cell line.

Authors:  K Yamashina; B E Miller; G H Heppner
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  Macrophages and cathepsin proteases blunt chemotherapeutic response in breast cancer.

Authors:  Tanaya Shree; Oakley C Olson; Benelita T Elie; Jemila C Kester; Alfred L Garfall; Kenishana Simpson; Katherine M Bell-McGuinn; Emily C Zabor; Edi Brogi; Johanna A Joyce
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 5.  Implication of tumor microenvironment in the resistance to chemotherapy in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Fabrice Andre; Narjiss Berrada; Christine Desmedt
Journal:  Curr Opin Oncol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.645

6.  Role of checkpoint kinase 1 in preventing premature mitosis in response to gemcitabine.

Authors:  Meredith A Morgan; Leslie A Parsels; Joshua D Parsels; Alefiyah K Mesiwala; Jonathan Maybaum; Theodore S Lawrence
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2005-08-01       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Targeting tumor-infiltrating macrophages decreases tumor-initiating cells, relieves immunosuppression, and improves chemotherapeutic responses.

Authors:  Jonathan B Mitchem; Donal J Brennan; Brett L Knolhoff; Brian A Belt; Yu Zhu; Dominic E Sanford; Larisa Belaygorod; Danielle Carpenter; Lynne Collins; David Piwnica-Worms; Stephen Hewitt; Girish Mallya Udupi; William M Gallagher; Craig Wegner; Brian L West; Andrea Wang-Gillam; Peter Goedegebuure; David C Linehan; David G DeNardo
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Macrophages are an abundant component of myeloma microenvironment and protect myeloma cells from chemotherapy drug-induced apoptosis.

Authors:  Yuhuan Zheng; Zhen Cai; Siqing Wang; Xiang Zhang; Jianfei Qian; Sungyoul Hong; Haiyan Li; Michael Wang; Jing Yang; Qing Yi
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 22.113

9.  Paracrine regulation of pancreatic cancer cell invasion by peripheral nerves.

Authors:  Ziv Gil; Oren Cavel; Kaitlyn Kelly; Peter Brader; Avigail Rein; Sizhi P Gao; Diane L Carlson; Jatin P Shah; Yuman Fong; Richard J Wong
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Tumour micro-environment elicits innate resistance to RAF inhibitors through HGF secretion.

Authors:  Ravid Straussman; Teppei Morikawa; Kevin Shee; Michal Barzily-Rokni; Zhi Rong Qian; Jinyan Du; Ashli Davis; Margaret M Mongare; Joshua Gould; Dennie T Frederick; Zachary A Cooper; Paul B Chapman; David B Solit; Antoni Ribas; Roger S Lo; Keith T Flaherty; Shuji Ogino; Jennifer A Wargo; Todd R Golub
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 49.962

  10 in total
  23 in total

Review 1.  The Emerging Role of Cytidine Deaminase in Human Diseases: A New Opportunity for Therapy?

Authors:  Audrey Frances; Pierre Cordelier
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2019-12-06       Impact factor: 11.454

Review 2.  Microenvironment in determining chemo-resistance in pancreatic cancer: Neighborhood matters.

Authors:  Patricia Dauer; Alice Nomura; Ashok Saluja; Sulagna Banerjee
Journal:  Pancreatology       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 3.996

3.  Chemoresistance in pancreatic cancer: Emerging concepts.

Authors:  Manu Gnanamony; Christopher S Gondi
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 4.  Overcoming chemoresistance by targeting reprogrammed metabolism: the Achilles' heel of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Abudureyimu Tuerhong; Jin Xu; Si Shi; Zhen Tan; Qingcai Meng; Jie Hua; Jiang Liu; Bo Zhang; Wei Wang; Xianjun Yu; Chen Liang
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 5.  Myeloid Cells as Targets for Therapy in Solid Tumors.

Authors:  Tiziana Cotechini; Terry R Medler; Lisa M Coussens
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.360

Review 6.  Combining anaerobic bacterial oncolysis with vaccination that blocks interleukin-10 signaling may achieve better outcomes for late stage cancer management.

Authors:  Guoying Ni; Tianfang Wang; Lin Yang; Yuejian Wang; Xiaosong Liu; Ming Q Wei
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Combined Src/EGFR Inhibition Targets STAT3 Signaling and Induces Stromal Remodeling to Improve Survival in Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Austin R Dosch; Xizi Dai; Michelle L Reyzer; Siddharth Mehra; Supriya Srinivasan; Brent A Willobee; Deukwoo Kwon; Nilesh Kashikar; Richard Caprioli; Nipun B Merchant; Nagaraj S Nagathihalli
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 5.852

8.  Nucleoside-catabolizing enzymes in mycoplasma-infected tumor cell cultures compromise the cytostatic activity of the anticancer drug gemcitabine.

Authors:  Johan Vande Voorde; Suna Sabuncuoğlu; Sam Noppen; Anders Hofer; Farahnaz Ranjbarian; Steffen Fieuws; Jan Balzarini; Sandra Liekens
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Tumor-Associated Macrophage-Mediated Targeted Therapy of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Mengmeng Niu; Solange Valdes; Youssef W Naguib; Stephen D Hursting; Zhengrong Cui
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 10.  Does the Microenvironment Hold the Hidden Key for Functional Precision Medicine in Pancreatic Cancer?

Authors:  John Kokkinos; Anya Jensen; George Sharbeen; Joshua A McCarroll; David Goldstein; Koroush S Haghighi; Phoebe A Phillips
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 6.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.