Literature DB >> 24495163

Genomics education for the public: perspectives of genomic researchers and ELSI advisors.

Lynn G Dressler1, Sondra Smolek Jones, Janell M Markey, Katherine W Byerly, Megan C Roberts.   

Abstract

AIMS: For more than two decades genomic education of the public has been a significant challenge. As genomic information becomes integrated into daily life and routine clinical care, the need for public education is even more critical. We conducted a pilot study to learn how genomic researchers and ethical, legal, and social implications advisors who were affiliated with large-scale genomic variation studies have approached the issue of educating the public about genomics. METHODS/
RESULTS: Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with researchers and advisors associated with the SNP/HAPMAP studies and the Cancer Genome Atlas Study. Respondents described approach(es) associated with educating the public about their study. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, coded, and analyzed by team review. Although few respondents described formal educational efforts, most provided recommendations for what should/could be done, emphasizing the need for an overarching entity(s) to take responsibility to lead the effort to educate the public. Opposing views were described related to: who this should be; the overall goal of the educational effort; and the educational approach. Four thematic areas emerged: What is the rationale for educating the public about genomics?; Who is the audience?; Who should be responsible for this effort?; and What should the content be? Policy issues associated with these themes included the need to agree on philosophical framework(s) to guide the rationale, content, and target audiences for education programs; coordinate previous/ongoing educational efforts; and develop a centralized knowledge base. Suggestions for next steps are presented.
CONCLUSION: A complex interplay of philosophical, professional, and cultural issues can create impediments to genomic education of the public. Many challenges, however, can be addressed by agreement on a guiding philosophical framework(s) and identification of a responsible entity(s) to provide leadership for developing/overseeing an appropriate infrastructure to support the coordination/integration/sharing and evaluation of educational efforts, benefiting consumers and professionals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24495163      PMCID: PMC3948600          DOI: 10.1089/gtmb.2013.0366

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers        ISSN: 1945-0257


  27 in total

1.  From genomes to cures--a long way to go. More than a year after the publication of the first draft of the human genome, scientists took stock of its implications for science and society.

Authors:  Susan R Owens; Holger Breithaupt
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 8.807

2.  Thresholds and boundaries in the disclosure of individual genetic research results.

Authors:  Lynn G Dressler; Eric T Juengst
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 11.229

3.  A map to a new treasure island: the human genome and the concept of common heritage.

Authors:  C Byk
Journal:  J Med Philos       Date:  1998-06

4.  Health literacy: the essential catalyst for the responsible and effective translation of genome-based information for the benefit of population health.

Authors:  Kristine Sørensen; Helmut Brand
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 2.000

5.  Genome-based health literacy: a new challenge for public health genomics.

Authors:  E V Syurina; I Brankovic; N Probst-Hensch; A Brand
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 2.000

6.  The Human Genome Project. Revealing the shared inheritance of all humankind.

Authors:  F S Collins; M K Mansoura
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2001-01-01       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Communicating genetic and genomic information: health literacy and numeracy considerations.

Authors:  D H Lea; K A Kaphingst; D Bowen; I Lipkus; D W Hadley
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 2.000

8.  Education in a genomic world.

Authors:  Joseph McInerney
Journal:  J Med Philos       Date:  2002-06

9.  Competencies for the physician medical geneticist in the 21st century.

Authors:  Bruce R Korf; Mira Irons; Michael S Watson
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  A comprehensive analysis of high school genetics standards: are states keeping pace with modern genetics?

Authors:  M J Dougherty; C Pleasants; L Solow; A Wong; H Zhang
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 3.325

View more
  10 in total

1.  Consumer familiarity, perspectives and expected value of personalized medicine with a focus on applications in oncology.

Authors:  Susan Garfeld; Michael P Douglas; Karen V MacDonald; Deborah A Marshall; Kathryn A Phillips
Journal:  Per Med       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 2.512

2.  Cancer genetic health communication in families tested for hereditary breast/ovarian cancer risk: a qualitative investigation of impact on children's genetic health literacy and psychosocial adjustment.

Authors:  Kenneth P Tercyak; Suzanne M Bronheim; Nicole Kahn; Hillary A Robertson; Bruno J Anthony; Darren Mays; Suzanne C O'Neill; Susan K Peterson; Susan Miesfeldt; Beth N Peshkin; Tiffani A DeMarco
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  Persistent confusion and controversy surrounding gene patents.

Authors:  Christi J Guerrini; Mary A Majumder; Amy L McGuire
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 54.908

4.  Perceptions of students in health and molecular life sciences regarding pharmacogenomics and personalized medicine.

Authors:  Lejla Mahmutovic; Betul Akcesme; Camil Durakovic; Faruk Berat Akcesme; Aida Maric; Muhamed Adilovic; Nour Hamad; Matthias Wjst; Oliver Feeney; Sabina Semiz
Journal:  Hum Genomics       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 4.639

5.  IGNITE network: Response of patients to genomic medicine interventions.

Authors:  Lori A Orlando; Corrine Voils; Carol R Horowitz; Rachel A Myers; Meghan J Arwood; Emily J Cicali; Caitrin W McDonough; Toni I Pollin; Yue Guan; Kenneth D Levy; Andrea Ramirez; Alexandra Quittner; Ebony B Madden
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2019-03-20       Impact factor: 2.183

Review 6.  Role of genomics literacy in reducing the burden of common genetic diseases in Africa.

Authors:  Gerald Mboowa; Ivan Sserwadda
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2019-05-26       Impact factor: 2.183

Review 7.  Genomics Education in the Era of Personal Genomics: Academic, Professional, and Public Considerations.

Authors:  Kiara V Whitley; Josie A Tueller; K Scott Weber
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  Attitudes towards personal genomics among older Swiss adults: An exploratory study.

Authors:  Laura Mählmann; Christina Röcke; Angela Brand; Ernst Hafen; Effy Vayena
Journal:  Appl Transl Genom       Date:  2016-02-01

9.  Health professionals' and researchers' perspectives on prenatal whole genome and exome sequencing: 'We can't shut the door now, the genie's out, we need to refine it'.

Authors:  Ruth Horn; Michael Parker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A Web Screening on Training Initiatives in Cancer Genomics for Healthcare Professionals.

Authors:  Ilda Hoxhaj; Flavia Beccia; Giovanna Elisa Calabrò; Stefania Boccia
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-26       Impact factor: 4.096

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.