Literature DB >> 31353183

Monovision and the Misperception of Motion.

Johannes Burge1, Victor Rodriguez-Lopez2, Carlos Dorronsoro3.   

Abstract

Monovision is a common prescription lens correction for presbyopia [1]. Each eye is corrected for a different distance, causing one image to be blurrier than the other. Millions of people have monovision corrections, but little is known about how interocular blur differences affect motion perception. Here, we report that blur differences cause a previously unknown motion illusion that makes people dramatically misperceive the distance and three-dimensional direction of moving objects. The effect occurs because the blurry and sharp images are processed at different speeds. For moving objects, the mismatch in processing speed causes a neural disparity, which results in the misperceptions. A variant of a 100-year-old stereo-motion phenomenon called the Pulfrich effect [2], the illusion poses an apparent paradox: blur reduces contrast, and contrast reductions are known to cause neural processing delays [3-6], but our results indicate that blurry images are processed milliseconds more quickly. We resolve the paradox with known properties of the early visual system, show that the misperceptions can be severe enough to impact public safety, and demonstrate that the misperceptions can be eliminated with novel combinations of non-invasive ophthalmic interventions. The fact that substantial perceptual errors are caused by millisecond differences in processing speed highlights the exquisite temporal calibration required for accurate perceptual estimation. The motion illusion-the reverse Pulfrich effect-and the paradigm we use to measure it should help reveal how optical and image properties impact temporal processing, an important but understudied issue in vision and visual neuroscience.
Copyright © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adaptation; anti-Pulfrich correction; binding problem; defocus; disparity; monovision; motion-in-depth; spatial frequency

Year:  2019        PMID: 31353183      PMCID: PMC6730667          DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.06.070

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  47 in total

1.  Apparent motion and the Pulfrich effect.

Authors:  M J Morgan; P Thompson
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1975       Impact factor: 1.490

2.  On the delay in processing high spatial frequency visual information: reaction time and VEP latency study of the effect of local intensity of stimulation.

Authors:  Angel Vassilev; Milena Mihaylova; Claude Bonnet
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Spatial and temporal tuning of motion in depth.

Authors:  Martin Lages; Pascal Mamassian; Erich W Graf
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  On some remarkable and hitherto unobserved phenomena of binocular vision.

Authors:  C WHEATSTONE
Journal:  Optom Wkly       Date:  1962-11-22

5.  Adaptive temporal integration of motion in direction-selective neurons in macaque visual cortex.

Authors:  Wyeth Bair; J Anthony Movshon
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-08-18       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Monovision contact lens use in the aviation environment: a report of a contact lens-related aircraft accident.

Authors:  V B Nakagawara; S J Véronneau
Journal:  Optometry       Date:  2000-06

7.  The stroboscopic Pulfrich effect is not evidence for the joint encoding of motion and depth.

Authors:  Jenny C A Read; Bruce G Cumming
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2005-05-17       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  All Pulfrich-like illusions can be explained without joint encoding of motion and disparity.

Authors:  Jenny C A Read; Bruce G Cumming
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2005-12-19       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 9.  Into the twilight zone: the complexities of mesopic vision and luminous efficiency.

Authors:  Andrew Stockman; Lindsay T Sharpe
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.117

10.  Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion.

Authors:  Marc O Ernst; Martin S Banks
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-01-24       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  3 in total

1.  Predicting the Partition of Behavioral Variability in Speed Perception with Naturalistic Stimuli.

Authors:  Benjamin M Chin; Johannes Burge
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  The magnitude of monocular light attenuation required to elicit the Pulfrich illusion.

Authors:  C Vijay Reena Durai; Siddhart Rajendran; Michael A Webster; Sandeep Vempati; Shrikant R Bharadwaj
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 1.984

3.  Delayed Correction for Extrapolation in Amblyopia.

Authors:  Xi Wang; Meng Liao; Yutong Song; Longqian Liu; Alexandre Reynaud
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 4.799

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.