Literature DB >> 24487211

Identification of natural direct effects when a confounder of the mediator is directly affected by exposure.

Eric J Tchetgen Tchetgen1, Tyler J Vanderweele.   

Abstract

Natural direct and indirect effects formalize traditional notions of mediation analysis into a rigorous causal framework and have recently received considerable attention in epidemiology and in social sciences. Sufficient conditions for the identification of natural direct effects were formulated by Judea Pearl under a nonparametric structural equations model, which assumes certain independencies between potential outcomes. A common situation in epidemiology is that a confounder of the mediator-outcome relationship is itself affected by the exposure, in which case natural direct effects fail to be nonparametrically identified without additional assumptions, even under Pearl's nonparametric structural equations model. In this article, we show that when a single binary confounder of the mediator is affected by the exposure, the natural direct effect is nonparametrically identified under the model, assuming monotonicity about the effect of the exposure on the confounder. A similar result is shown to hold for a vector of binary confounders of the mediator under a certain independence assumption about the confounders. Finally, we show that natural direct effects are more generally identified if there is no additive mean interaction between the mediator and the confounders of the mediator affected by exposure. When correct, this latter assumption is particularly appealing because it does not require monotonicity of effects of the exposure. In addition, it places no restriction on the nature of the confounders of the mediator, which can be continuous or polytomous.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24487211      PMCID: PMC4230499          DOI: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epidemiology        ISSN: 1044-3983            Impact factor:   4.822


  12 in total

1.  On causal mediation analysis with a survival outcome.

Authors:  Eric J Tchetgen Tchetgen
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2011-09-02       Impact factor: 0.968

2.  On the relations between excess fraction, attributable fraction, and etiologic fraction.

Authors:  Etsuji Suzuki; Eiji Yamamoto; Toshihide Tsuda
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Alternative assumptions for the identification of direct and indirect effects.

Authors:  Danella M Hafeman; Tyler J VanderWeele
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 4.822

4.  Identifiability and exchangeability for direct and indirect effects.

Authors:  J M Robins; S Greenland
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 4.822

5.  Estimation of direct causal effects.

Authors:  Maya L Petersen; Sandra E Sinisi; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.822

6.  Bounding the infectiousness effect in vaccine trials.

Authors:  Tyler J VanderWeele; Eric J Tchetgen Tchetgen
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.822

7.  Marginal structural models for the estimation of direct and indirect effects.

Authors:  Tyler J VanderWeele
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.822

8.  Estimating direct effects in cohort and case-control studies.

Authors:  Stijn Vansteelandt
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 4.822

9.  Multiply robust inference for statistical interactions.

Authors:  Stijn Vansteelandt; Tyler J Vanderweele; James M Robins
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 5.033

10.  Odds ratios for mediation analysis for a dichotomous outcome.

Authors:  Tyler J Vanderweele; Stijn Vansteelandt
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 5.363

View more
  21 in total

1.  Practical guidance for conducting mediation analysis with multiple mediators using inverse odds ratio weighting.

Authors:  Quynh C Nguyen; Theresa L Osypuk; Nicole M Schmidt; M Maria Glymour; Eric J Tchetgen Tchetgen
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Mediation analysis for count and zero-inflated count data.

Authors:  Jing Cheng; Nancy F Cheng; Zijian Guo; Steven Gregorich; Amid I Ismail; Stuart A Gansky
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2017-01-08       Impact factor: 3.021

3.  Parametric Mediational g-Formula Approach to Mediation Analysis with Time-varying Exposures, Mediators, and Confounders.

Authors:  Sheng-Hsuan Lin; Jessica Young; Roger Logan; Eric J Tchetgen Tchetgen; Tyler J VanderWeele
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.822

4.  Mediation analysis with time varying exposures and mediators.

Authors:  Tyler J VanderWeele; Eric J Tchetgen Tchetgen
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 4.488

5.  Estimation of a Semiparametric Natural Direct Effect Model Incorporating Baseline Covariates.

Authors:  E J Tchetgen Tchetgen; I Shpitser
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.445

6.  Causal Mediation Analysis Could Resolve Whether Training-Induced Increases in Muscle Strength are Mediated by Muscle Hypertrophy.

Authors:  James L Nuzzo; Harrison T Finn; Robert D Herbert
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 11.136

7.  A Tutorial in Bayesian Potential Outcomes Mediation Analysis.

Authors:  Milica Miočević; Oscar Gonzalez; Matthew J Valente; David P MacKinnon
Journal:  Struct Equ Modeling       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 6.125

Review 8.  Prenatal Antidepressant Exposure and Childhood Autism Spectrum Disorders: Cause for Concern?

Authors:  Lars Henning Pedersen
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.022

9.  Causal mediation analysis with multiple causally non-ordered mediators.

Authors:  Masataka Taguri; John Featherstone; Jing Cheng
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 3.021

10.  Confounding in statistical mediation analysis: What it is and how to address it.

Authors:  Matthew J Valente; William E Pelham; Heather Smyth; David P MacKinnon
Journal:  J Couns Psychol       Date:  2017-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.