Literature DB >> 25693776

Practical guidance for conducting mediation analysis with multiple mediators using inverse odds ratio weighting.

Quynh C Nguyen, Theresa L Osypuk, Nicole M Schmidt, M Maria Glymour, Eric J Tchetgen Tchetgen.   

Abstract

Despite the recent flourishing of mediation analysis techniques, many modern approaches are difficult to implement or applicable to only a restricted range of regression models. This report provides practical guidance for implementing a new technique utilizing inverse odds ratio weighting (IORW) to estimate natural direct and indirect effects for mediation analyses. IORW takes advantage of the odds ratio's invariance property and condenses information on the odds ratio for the relationship between the exposure (treatment) and multiple mediators, conditional on covariates, by regressing exposure on mediators and covariates. The inverse of the covariate-adjusted exposure-mediator odds ratio association is used to weight the primary analytical regression of the outcome on treatment. The treatment coefficient in such a weighted regression estimates the natural direct effect of treatment on the outcome, and indirect effects are identified by subtracting direct effects from total effects. Weighting renders treatment and mediators independent, thereby deactivating indirect pathways of the mediators. This new mediation technique accommodates multiple discrete or continuous mediators. IORW is easily implemented and is appropriate for any standard regression model, including quantile regression and survival analysis. An empirical example is given using data from the Moving to Opportunity (1994-2002) experiment, testing whether neighborhood context mediated the effects of a housing voucher program on obesity. Relevant Stata code (StataCorp LP, College Station, Texas) is provided.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  direct effects; effect decomposition; indirect effects; mediation; weighted regression

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25693776      PMCID: PMC4339385          DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwu278

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  30 in total

1.  Fallibility in estimating direct effects.

Authors:  Stephen R Cole; Miguel A Hernán
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 7.196

2.  A modified poisson regression approach to prospective studies with binary data.

Authors:  Guangyong Zou
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2004-04-01       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Bias and efficiency of multiple imputation compared with complete-case analysis for missing covariate values.

Authors:  Ian R White; John B Carlin
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2010-12-10       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Marginal structural models for the estimation of direct and indirect effects.

Authors:  Tyler J VanderWeele
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.822

5.  Direct and indirect effects in a survival context.

Authors:  Theis Lange; Jørgen V Hansen
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.822

6.  On doubly robust estimation in a semiparametric odds ratio model.

Authors:  Eric J Tchetgen Tchetgen; James M Robins; Andrea Rotnitzky
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  2009-12-08       Impact factor: 2.445

7.  Mediation Analysis with Multiple Mediators.

Authors:  T J VanderWeele; S Vansteelandt
Journal:  Epidemiol Methods       Date:  2014-01

8.  Identification of natural direct effects when a confounder of the mediator is directly affected by exposure.

Authors:  Eric J Tchetgen Tchetgen; Tyler J Vanderweele
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.822

9.  Differential mental health effects of neighborhood relocation among youth in vulnerable families: results from a randomized trial.

Authors:  Theresa L Osypuk; Eric J Tchetgen Tchetgen; Dolores Acevedo-Garcia; Felton J Earls; Alisa Lincoln; Nicole M Schmidt; M Maria Glymour
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2012-12

10.  Bias in diet assessment methods--consequences of collinearity and measurement errors on power and observed relative risks.

Authors:  S Elmståhl; B Gullberg
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 7.196

View more
  58 in total

1.  School performance and mortality: The mediating role of educational attainment and work and family trajectories across the life course.

Authors:  Andrew Halpern-Manners; James M Raymo; John R Warren; Kaitlin Johnson
Journal:  Adv Life Course Res       Date:  2020-08-30

Review 2.  Approaches for incorporating environmental mixtures as mediators in mediation analysis.

Authors:  Andrea Bellavia; Tamarra James-Todd; Paige L Williams
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 9.621

3.  Influenza Hemagglutination-inhibition Antibody Titer as a Mediator of Vaccine-induced Protection for Influenza B.

Authors:  Benjamin J Cowling; Wey Wen Lim; Ranawaka A P M Perera; Vicky J Fang; Gabriel M Leung; J S Malik Peiris; Eric J Tchetgen Tchetgen
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 9.079

4.  Associations between racial discrimination, smoking during pregnancy and low birthweight among Roma.

Authors:  Teresa Janevic; Theresa Osypuk; Kristefer Stojanovski; Janko Jankovic; Daniel Gundersen; Maggie Rogers
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 3.367

5.  Decompositions of the Contribution of Treatment Disparities to Survival Disparities in Stage I-II Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Douglas S Swords; Courtney L Scaife
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  FWER and FDR control when testing multiple mediators.

Authors:  Joshua N Sampson; Simina M Boca; Steven C Moore; Ruth Heller
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2018-07-15       Impact factor: 6.937

7.  Association of Socioeconomic Status and Comorbidities with Racial Disparities during Kidney Transplant Evaluation.

Authors:  Karly A Murphy; John W Jackson; Tanjala S Purnell; Ashton A Shaffer; Christine E Haugen; Nadia M Chu; Deidra C Crews; Silas P Norman; Dorry L Segev; Mara A McAdams-DeMarco
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 8.237

8.  Socioeconomic Factors Explain Racial Disparities in Invasive Community-Associated Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Disease Rates.

Authors:  Isaac See; Paul Wesson; Nicole Gualandi; Ghinwa Dumyati; Lee H Harrison; Lindsey Lesher; Joelle Nadle; Susan Petit; Claire Reisenauer; William Schaffner; Amy Tunali; Yi Mu; Jennifer Ahern
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 9.079

9.  Quantifying Sex-Based Disparities in Liver Allocation.

Authors:  Jayme E Locke; Brittany A Shelton; Kim M Olthoff; Elizabeth A Pomfret; Kimberly A Forde; Deirdre Sawinski; Meagan Gray; Nancy L Ascher
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 14.766

10.  The Association Between Protein Intake by Source and Osteoporotic Fracture in Older Men: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Lisa Langsetmo; James M Shikany; Peggy M Cawthon; Jane A Cauley; Brent C Taylor; Tien N Vo; Douglas C Bauer; Eric S Orwoll; John T Schousboe; Kristine E Ensrud
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 6.741

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.