Literature DB >> 24487172

Pediatric robotic pyeloplasty in patients weighing less than 10 kg initial experience.

Gloria Pelizzo1, Ghassan Nakib, Ilaria Goruppi, Luigi Avolio, Piero Romano, Alessandro Raffaele, Federico Scorletti, Simonetta Mencherini, Valeria Calcaterra.   

Abstract

AIM: To report the feasibility and safety of a robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP) in patients weighing <10 kg.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three patients weighing between 5 and 8 kg who were affected by severe congenital ureteropelvic junction obstruction, including a child with solitary kidney, were subjected to RALP. Three trocars were placed; sutures and pyeloplasty remodeling were performed with interrupted stitches. A double J stent was inserted through a 2-mm transparietal angiocatheter to protect the pyelic suture.
RESULTS: The procedures were all completed within 90 minutes, the "docking" time requiring 20 minutes. The patients were discharged on postoperative day 2, without any complications.
CONCLUSIONS: Comprehensive assessment of pyelic suture in a very narrow field with 2 operative instruments is feasible and safe. Robotic pyeloplasty provides all the advantages of mini-invasive surgery with the added advantage of higher magnification and excellent surgical navigation in very small spaces and on fragile infant tissues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24487172     DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31828e3f18

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech        ISSN: 1530-4515            Impact factor:   1.719


  5 in total

1.  Comparison of 8 and 5 mm robotic instruments in small cavities : 5 or 8 mm robotic instruments for small cavities?

Authors:  Quentin Ballouhey; Pauline Clermidi; Jérôme Cros; Céline Grosos; Clémence Rosa-Arsène; Claire Bahans; François Caire; Bernard Longis; Roxane Compagnon; Laurent Fourcade
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Global trends in paediatric robot-assisted urological surgery: a bibliometric and Progressive Scholarly Acceptance analysis.

Authors:  Thomas P Cundy; Simon J D Harley; Hani J Marcus; Archie Hughes-Hallett; Sanjeev Khurana
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2017-04-28

3.  A comparison of robotic surgery in children weighing above and below 15.0 kg: size does not affect surgery success.

Authors:  Quentin Ballouhey; Thierry Villemagne; Jérôme Cros; Caroline Szwarc; Karim Braik; Bernard Longis; Hubert Lardy; Laurent Fourcade
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Robotic-assisted surgery for excision of an enlarged prostatic utricle.

Authors:  Ilaria Goruppi; Luigi Avolio; Piero Romano; Alessandro Raffaele; Gloria Pelizzo
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2015-03-13

5.  Robotic infant surgery with 3 mm instruments: a study in piglets of less than 10 kg body weight.

Authors:  Thomas F Krebs; Jan-Hendrik Egberts; Ulf Lorenzen; Martin F Krause; Katja Reischig; Roberts Meiksans; Jonas Baastrup; Andreas Meinzer; Ibrahim Alkatout; Gesa Cohrs; Henning Wieker; Annette Lüthje; Sarah Vieten; Gerhard Schultheiss; Robert Bergholz
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2021-03-26
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.