Joseph J Schreiber1, Alexander P Hughes1, Fadi Taher1, Federico P Girardi1. 1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Spine and Scoliosis Service, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021 USA ; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10065 USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Measuring Hounsfield units (HUs) from computed tomography (CT) scans has recently been proposed as a tool for assessing vertebral bone quality, as it has been associated with bone mineral density, compressive strength, and fracture risk. Vertebral bone quality is believed to be an important determinant of outcome and complication rates following spine surgery and potentially influences success of interbody spinal fusion. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between HU on CT scans and fusion success in patients with lateral transpsoas surgery for lumbar interbody fusion (LIF). METHODS: The CT scans of 28 patients with a combined 52 levels of stand-alone LIF were evaluated at a minimum of 12 weeks postoperatively. Coronal and sagittal images were evaluated for evidence of fusion, and HU values were collected from axial images. HU measurements were also taken from vertebral bodies proximal to the construct to evaluate global bone quality. RESULTS: Of the 52 LIF levels, 73% were assessed as fused and 27% were nonunited at the time of evaluation. The successful fusion levels had significantly higher HU measurements than the nonunion levels (203.3 vs. 139.8, p < 0.001). Patients with successful fusion constructs also had higher global bone density when vertebral bodies proximal to the construct were compared (133.7 vs. 107.3, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: With the aging population and increasing prevalence of osteoporosis, preoperative assessment of bone quality prior to spinal fusion deserves special consideration. We found that a successful lumbar fusion was associated with patients with higher bone density, as assessed with HU, both globally and within the fusion construct, as compared to patients with CT evidence of nonunion.
BACKGROUND: Measuring Hounsfield units (HUs) from computed tomography (CT) scans has recently been proposed as a tool for assessing vertebral bone quality, as it has been associated with bone mineral density, compressive strength, and fracture risk. Vertebral bone quality is believed to be an important determinant of outcome and complication rates following spine surgery and potentially influences success of interbody spinal fusion. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between HU on CT scans and fusion success in patients with lateral transpsoas surgery for lumbar interbody fusion (LIF). METHODS: The CT scans of 28 patients with a combined 52 levels of stand-alone LIF were evaluated at a minimum of 12 weeks postoperatively. Coronal and sagittal images were evaluated for evidence of fusion, and HU values were collected from axial images. HU measurements were also taken from vertebral bodies proximal to the construct to evaluate global bone quality. RESULTS: Of the 52 LIF levels, 73% were assessed as fused and 27% were nonunited at the time of evaluation. The successful fusion levels had significantly higher HU measurements than the nonunion levels (203.3 vs. 139.8, p < 0.001). Patients with successful fusion constructs also had higher global bone density when vertebral bodies proximal to the construct were compared (133.7 vs. 107.3, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: With the aging population and increasing prevalence of osteoporosis, preoperative assessment of bone quality prior to spinal fusion deserves special consideration. We found that a successful lumbar fusion was associated with patients with higher bone density, as assessed with HU, both globally and within the fusion construct, as compared to patients with CT evidence of nonunion.
Authors: Amit K Sharma; Christopher K Kepler; Federico P Girardi; Frank P Cammisa; Russel C Huang; Andrew A Sama Journal: J Spinal Disord Tech Date: 2011-06
Authors: Gary A Fantini; Ioannis P Pappou; Federico P Girardi; Harvinder S Sandhu; Frank P Cammisa Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2007-11-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Dennis S Meredith; Joseph J Schreiber; Fadi Taher; Frank P Cammisa; Federico P Girardi Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2013-03-01 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: J Kenneth Burkus; Matthew F Gornet; Thomas C Schuler; Thomas J Kleeman; Thomas A Zdeblick Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2009-05 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Y Liu; A Dash; A Krez; H J Kim; M Cunningham; F Schwab; A Hughes; B Carlson; A Samuel; E Marty; H Moore; D J McMahon; J A Carrino; R S Bockman; E M Stein Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2020-01-09 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Kimia G Ganjaei; Zachary M Soler; Elliott D Mappus; Mitchell L Worley; Nicholas R Rowan; Guilherme J M Garcia; Lois J Matthews; Judy R Dubno; Mark A Eckert; Rodney J Schlosser Journal: Rhinology Date: 2019-04-01 Impact factor: 3.681
Authors: Thomas Mendel; Bernhard Wilhelm Ullrich; Gunther Olaf Hofmann; Philipp Schenk; Felix Goehre; Stefan Schwan; Friederike Klauke Journal: Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg Date: 2020-09-02 Impact factor: 3.693