OBJECTIVES: Population sexual mixing patterns can be quantified using Newman's assortativity coefficient (r). Suggested methods for estimating the SE for r may lead to inappropriate statistical conclusions in situations where intracluster correlation is ignored and/or when cluster size is predictive of the response. We describe a computer-intensive, but highly accessible, within-cluster resampling approach for providing a valid large-sample estimated SE for r and an associated 95% CI. METHODS: We introduce needed statistical notation and describe the within-cluster resampling approach. Sexual network data and a simulation study were employed to compare within-cluster resampling with standard methods when cluster size is informative. RESULTS: For the analysis of network data when cluster size is informative, the simulation study demonstrates that within-cluster resampling produces valid statistical inferences about Newman's assortativity coefficient, a popular statistic used to quantify the strength of mixing patterns. In contrast, commonly used methods are biased with attendant extremely poor CI coverage. Within-cluster resampling is recommended when cluster size is informative and/or when there is within-cluster response correlation. CONCLUSIONS: Within-cluster resampling is recommended for providing valid statistical inferences when applying Newman's assortativity coefficient r to network data. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
OBJECTIVES: Population sexual mixing patterns can be quantified using Newman's assortativity coefficient (r). Suggested methods for estimating the SE for r may lead to inappropriate statistical conclusions in situations where intracluster correlation is ignored and/or when cluster size is predictive of the response. We describe a computer-intensive, but highly accessible, within-cluster resampling approach for providing a valid large-sample estimated SE for r and an associated 95% CI. METHODS: We introduce needed statistical notation and describe the within-cluster resampling approach. Sexual network data and a simulation study were employed to compare within-cluster resampling with standard methods when cluster size is informative. RESULTS: For the analysis of network data when cluster size is informative, the simulation study demonstrates that within-cluster resampling produces valid statistical inferences about Newman's assortativity coefficient, a popular statistic used to quantify the strength of mixing patterns. In contrast, commonly used methods are biased with attendant extremely poor CI coverage. Within-cluster resampling is recommended when cluster size is informative and/or when there is within-cluster response correlation. CONCLUSIONS: Within-cluster resampling is recommended for providing valid statistical inferences when applying Newman's assortativity coefficient r to network data. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Entities:
Keywords:
Mathematical Model; Reproductive Health; Sexual Networks; Transmission Dynamics
Authors: G P Garnett; J P Hughes; R M Anderson; B P Stoner; S O Aral; W L Whittington; H H Handsfield; K K Holmes Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 1996 May-Jun Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Irene A Doherty; Adaora A Adimora; Stephen Q Muth; Marc L Serre; Peter A Leone; William C Miller Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2011-05 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Pamina M Gorbach; Ryan Murphy; Robert E Weiss; Christopher Hucks-Ortiz; Steven Shoptaw Journal: J Urban Health Date: 2009-06-19 Impact factor: 3.671
Authors: Thu Anh Nguyen; Pauline Oosterhoff; Anita Hardon; Hien Nguyen Tran; Roel A Coutinho; Pamela Wright Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2008-01-28 Impact factor: 3.295