BACKGROUND: In a largely rural region of North Carolina during 1998-2002, outbreaks of heterosexually transmitted syphilis occurred, tied to crack cocaine use and exchange of sex for drugs and money. Sexual partnership mixing patterns are an important characteristic of sexual networks that relate to transmission dynamics of sexually transmitted infections (STIs). METHODS: Using contact tracing data collected by disease intervention specialists, we estimated Newman assortativity coefficients and compared values in counties experiencing syphilis outbreaks to nonoutbreak counties, with respect to race/ethnicity, race/ethnicity and age, and the cases' number of social/sexual contacts, infected contacts, sex partners, and infected sex partners, and syphilis disease stage (primary, secondary, early latent). RESULTS: Individuals in the outbreak counties had more contacts and mixing by the number of sex partners was disassortative in outbreak counties and assortative nonoutbreak counties. Although mixing by syphilis disease stage was minimally assortative in outbreak counties, it was disassortative in nonoutbreak areas. Partnerships were relatively discordant by age, especially among older white men, who often chose considerably younger female partners. CONCLUSIONS: Whether assortative mixing exacerbates or attenuates the reach of STIs into different populations depends on the characteristic/attribute and epidemiologic phase. Examination of sexual partnership characteristics and mixing patterns offers insights into the growth of STI outbreaks that complement other research methods.
BACKGROUND: In a largely rural region of North Carolina during 1998-2002, outbreaks of heterosexually transmitted syphilis occurred, tied to crack cocaine use and exchange of sex for drugs and money. Sexual partnership mixing patterns are an important characteristic of sexual networks that relate to transmission dynamics of sexually transmitted infections (STIs). METHODS: Using contact tracing data collected by disease intervention specialists, we estimated Newman assortativity coefficients and compared values in counties experiencing syphilis outbreaks to nonoutbreak counties, with respect to race/ethnicity, race/ethnicity and age, and the cases' number of social/sexual contacts, infected contacts, sex partners, and infected sex partners, and syphilis disease stage (primary, secondary, early latent). RESULTS: Individuals in the outbreak counties had more contacts and mixing by the number of sex partners was disassortative in outbreak counties and assortative nonoutbreak counties. Although mixing by syphilis disease stage was minimally assortative in outbreak counties, it was disassortative in nonoutbreak areas. Partnerships were relatively discordant by age, especially among older white men, who often chose considerably younger female partners. CONCLUSIONS: Whether assortative mixing exacerbates or attenuates the reach of STIs into different populations depends on the characteristic/attribute and epidemiologic phase. Examination of sexual partnership characteristics and mixing patterns offers insights into the growth of STI outbreaks that complement other research methods.
Authors: J J Potterat; L Phillips-Plummer; S Q Muth; R B Rothenberg; D E Woodhouse; T S Maldonado-Long; H P Zimmerman; J B Muth Journal: Sex Transm Infect Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 3.519
Authors: Arlene C Seña; Stephen Q Muth; James D Heffelfinger; Judy Owen O'Dowd; Evelyn Foust; Peter Leone Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: S O Aral; J P Hughes; B Stoner; W Whittington; H H Handsfield; R M Anderson; K K Holmes Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 1999-06 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Ian Simms; Kevin A Fenton; Matthew Ashton; Katherine M E Turner; Emma E Crawley-Boevey; Russell Gorton; Daniel Rh Thomas; Audrey Lynch; Andrew Winter; Martin J Fisher; Lorraine Lighton; Helen C Maguire; Maria Solomou Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Richard Rothenberg; John Peterson; Mark Brown; Joan Marie Kraft; Robert Trotter; Carolyn Beeker Journal: Int J STD AIDS Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 1.359
Authors: Catherine H Mercer; Andrew J Copas; Pam Sonnenberg; Anne M Johnson; Sally McManus; Bob Erens; Jackie A Cassell Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2008-11-11 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Nirav S Shah; James Iveniuk; Stephen Q Muth; Stuart Michaels; Jo-Anne Jose; Edward O Laumann; John A Schneider Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2014-02
Authors: Dionne C Gesink; Ashleigh B Sullivan; Todd A Norwood; Marc L Serre; William C Miller Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2013-01 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Irene A Doherty; Marc L Serre; Dionne Gesink; Adaora A Adimora; Stephen Q Muth; Peter A Leone; William C Miller Journal: Epidemiology Date: 2012-11 Impact factor: 4.822
Authors: Dana K Pasquale; Irene A Doherty; William C Miller; Peter A Leone; Lynne A Sampson; Sue Lynn Ledford; Joseph Sebastian; Ann M Dennis Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2020-02 Impact factor: 3.868
Authors: Siobhan K Young; Robert H Lyles; Lawrence L Kupper; Jessica R Keys; Sandra L Martin; Elizabeth C Costenbader Journal: Sex Transm Infect Date: 2014-01-30 Impact factor: 4.199
Authors: Eric P F Chow; Tiffany R Phillips; Henry Bowesman; Jason J Ong; Julien Tran; Ei T Aung; Marcus Y Chen; Christopher K Fairley Journal: Hum Vaccin Immunother Date: 2022-06-17 Impact factor: 4.526
Authors: Dana K Pasquale; Irene A Doherty; Peter A Leone; Ann M Dennis; Erika Samoff; Constance S Jones; John Barnhart; William C Miller Journal: Appl Netw Sci Date: 2021-02-17