Literature DB >> 24481884

Social support, self-efficacy for decision-making, and follow-up care use in long-term cancer survivors.

Laura P Forsythe1, Catherine M Alfano, Erin E Kent, Kathryn E Weaver, Keith Bellizzi, Neeraj Arora, Noreen Aziz, Gretchen Keel, Julia H Rowland.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Cancer survivors play an important role in coordinating their follow-up care and making treatment-related decisions. Little is known about how modifiable factors such as social support are associated with active participation in follow-up care. This study tests associations between social support, cancer-related follow-up care use, and self-efficacy for participation in decision-making related to follow-up care (SEDM). We also identified sociodemographic and clinical factors associated with social support among long-term survivors.
METHODS: The FOllow-up Care Use among Survivors study is a cross-sectional, population-based survey of breast, prostate, colon, and gynecologic cancer survivors (n=1522) 4-14 years post-diagnosis. Multivariable regression models were used to test associations between perceived social support (tangible and emotional/informational support modeled separately), follow-up care use (past 2 years), and SEDM, as well as to identify factors associated with perceived support.
RESULTS: Neither support type was associated with follow-up care use (all p>0.05), although marital status was uniquely, positively associated with follow-up care use (p<0.05). Both tangible support (B for a standard deviation increase (SE)=9.75(3.15), p<0.05) and emotional/informational support (B(SE)=12.61(3.05), p<0.001) were modestly associated with SEDM. Being married, having adequate financial resources, history of recurrence, and better perceived health status were associated with higher perceived tangible and emotional support (all p<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: While perceived social support may facilitate survivor efficacy for participation in decision-making during cancer follow-up care, other factors, including marital satisfaction, appear to influence follow-up care use. Marital status and social support may be important factors to consider in survivorship care planning.
Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cancer; decision-making; follow-up care; social support

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24481884      PMCID: PMC4082440          DOI: 10.1002/pon.3480

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychooncology        ISSN: 1057-9249            Impact factor:   3.894


  45 in total

1.  SES differentials in health by age and alternative indicators of SES.

Authors:  S Robert; J S House
Journal:  J Aging Health       Date:  1996-08

Review 2.  Common psychosocial factors underlying breast cancer screening and breast cancer treatment adherence: a conceptual review and synthesis.

Authors:  Carol Magai; Nathan Consedine; Alfred I Neugut; Dawn L Hershman
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 3.  Social support and quality of life among lung cancer patients: a systematic review.

Authors:  Aleksandra Luszczynska; Izabela Pawlowska; Roman Cieslak; Nina Knoll; Urte Scholz
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 3.894

Review 4.  Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis.

Authors:  S Cohen; T A Wills
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 17.737

5.  Resources for health: differential effects of optimistic self-beliefs and social support according to socioeconomic status.

Authors:  Ina Schöllgen; Oliver Huxhold; Benjamin Schüz; Clemens Tesch-Römer
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.267

6.  Breast cancer and problems with medical interactions: relationships with traumatic stress, emotional self-efficacy, and social support.

Authors:  Win T Han; Kate Collie; Cheryl Koopman; Jay Azarow; Catherine Classen; Gary R Morrow; Betsy Michel; Eileen Brennan-O'Neill; David Spiegel
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.894

Review 7.  Associations of social networks with cancer mortality: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Martin Pinquart; Paul R Duberstein
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 6.312

8.  Determinants of participation in treatment decision-making by older breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Rose C Maly; Yoshiko Umezawa; Barbara Leake; Rebecca A Silliman
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  Population-based survivorship research using cancer registries: a study of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma survivors.

Authors:  Neeraj K Arora; Ann S Hamilton; Arnold L Potosky; Julia H Rowland; Noreen M Aziz; Keith M Bellizzi; Carrie N Klabunde; Wendy McLaughlin; Jennifer Stevens
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 4.442

10.  Double Jeopardy? Age, Race, and HRQOL in Older Adults with Cancer.

Authors:  Keith M Bellizzi; Noreen M Aziz; Julia H Rowland; Kathryn Weaver; Neeraj K Arora; Ann S Hamilton; Ingrid Oakley-Girvan; Gretchen Keel
Journal:  J Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2012-07-25
View more
  22 in total

1.  Emotional social support and access to care among older people living with HIV in rural China.

Authors:  Chunqing Lin; Li Li; Guoping Ji; Wu Jie
Journal:  Int J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 3.485

2.  Racial Differences in Time to Breast Cancer Surgery and Overall Survival in the US Military Health System.

Authors:  Yvonne L Eaglehouse; Matthew W Georg; Craig D Shriver; Kangmin Zhu
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2019-03-20       Impact factor: 14.766

3.  Cancer patients' preferences for therapy decisions can be grouped into categories and separated by demographic factors.

Authors:  Jana Arnholdt; Jörg Haier
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 4.  [Cancer and family: tasks and stress of relatives].

Authors:  V Popek; K Hönig
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.214

5.  The association of marital status and mortality among men with early-stage prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy: insight into post-prostatectomy survival strategies.

Authors:  Saira Khan; Kenneth G Nepple; Adam S Kibel; Gurdarshan Sandhu; Dorina Kallogjeri; Seth Strope; Robert Grubb; Kathleen Y Wolin; Siobhan Sutcliffe
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 2.506

Review 6.  Decision aids for cancer survivors' engagement with survivorship care services after primary treatment: a systematic review.

Authors:  Yu Ke; Hanzhang Zhou; Raymond Javan Chan; Alexandre Chan
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 4.442

7.  Gender differences in associations between cancer-related problems and relationship dissolution among cancer survivors.

Authors:  Cristina Stephens; J Lee Westmaas; Jihye Kim; Rachel Cannady; Kevin Stein
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2016-03-19       Impact factor: 4.442

8.  Autonomy is not but competence and relatedness are associated with physical activity among colorectal cancer survivors.

Authors:  Kyoung-A Kim; Sang Hui Chu; Eui Geum Oh; Sang Joon Shin; Justin Y Jeon; Yun Jin Lee
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Promoting Clinical Conversations about Lung Cancer Screening: Exploring the Role of Perceived Online Social Support.

Authors:  Samantha R Paige; Ramzi G Salloum; Janice L Krieger; Maribeth Williams; Wei Xue; Babette Brumback
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2020-10-29

10.  Patterns and characteristics of patients' selection of cancer surgeons.

Authors:  Natalie J Del Vecchio; Natoshia M Askelson; Knute D Carter; Elizabeth Chrischilles; Charles F Lynch; Mary E Charlton
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 2.565

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.