Aleksandra Luszczynska1,2, Izabela Pawlowska2, Roman Cieslak1,3, Nina Knoll4, Urte Scholz5. 1. University of Colorado at Colorado Springs, Colorado Springs, CO, USA. 2. Warsaw School of Social Sciences and Humanities, Wroclaw, Poland. 3. Warsaw School of Social Sciences and Humanities, Warsaw, Poland. 4. Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany. 5. University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This systematic review analyzed the relationships between social support and quality of life (QOL) indicators among lung cancer patients. In particular, the patterns of relationships between different social support facets and sources (received and perceived support from healthcare professionals, family, and friends) and QOL aspects (emotional, physical symptoms, functional, and social) as well as the global QOL index were investigated. METHODS: The review yielded 14 original studies (57% applying cross-sectional designs) analyzing data from a total of 2759 patients. RESULTS: Regarding healthcare professionals as support source, corroborating evidence was found for associations between received support (as well as need for and satisfaction with received support) and all aspects of QOL, except for social ones. Overall, significant relations between support from healthcare personnel and QOL were observed more frequently (67% of analyzed associations), compared with support from families and friends (53% of analyzed associations). Corroborating evidence was found for the associations between perceived and received support from family and friends and emotional aspects of QOL. Research investigating perceived social support from unspecified sources indicated few significant relationships (25% of analyzed associations) and only for the global QOL index. CONCLUSIONS: Quantitative and qualitative differences in the associations between social support and QOL are observed, depending on the source and type of support. Psychosocial interventions may aim at enabling provision of social support from healthcare personnel in order to promote emotional, functional, and physical QOL among lung cancer patients.
OBJECTIVE: This systematic review analyzed the relationships between social support and quality of life (QOL) indicators among lung cancerpatients. In particular, the patterns of relationships between different social support facets and sources (received and perceived support from healthcare professionals, family, and friends) and QOL aspects (emotional, physical symptoms, functional, and social) as well as the global QOL index were investigated. METHODS: The review yielded 14 original studies (57% applying cross-sectional designs) analyzing data from a total of 2759 patients. RESULTS: Regarding healthcare professionals as support source, corroborating evidence was found for associations between received support (as well as need for and satisfaction with received support) and all aspects of QOL, except for social ones. Overall, significant relations between support from healthcare personnel and QOL were observed more frequently (67% of analyzed associations), compared with support from families and friends (53% of analyzed associations). Corroborating evidence was found for the associations between perceived and received support from family and friends and emotional aspects of QOL. Research investigating perceived social support from unspecified sources indicated few significant relationships (25% of analyzed associations) and only for the global QOL index. CONCLUSIONS: Quantitative and qualitative differences in the associations between social support and QOL are observed, depending on the source and type of support. Psychosocial interventions may aim at enabling provision of social support from healthcare personnel in order to promote emotional, functional, and physical QOL among lung cancerpatients.
Authors: Martin Eichler; Marlene Hechtner; Beatrice Wehler; Roland Buhl; Jan Stratmann; Martin Sebastian; Heinz Schmidberger; Cornelius Kortsik; Ursula Nestle; Hubert Wirtz; Thomas Wehler; Maria Blettner; Susanne Singer Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2019-07-10 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Laura P Forsythe; Catherine M Alfano; Erin E Kent; Kathryn E Weaver; Keith Bellizzi; Neeraj Arora; Noreen Aziz; Gretchen Keel; Julia H Rowland Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2014-01-30 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Susan Magasi; Jennifer Banas; Bruriah Horowitz; Judy Panko Reis; Kimberly The; Tom Wilson; David Victoson Journal: Prog Community Health Partnersh Date: 2019
Authors: Natalie J Del Vecchio; Natoshia M Askelson; Knute D Carter; Elizabeth Chrischilles; Charles F Lynch; Mary E Charlton Journal: Am J Surg Date: 2020-10-15 Impact factor: 2.565