Literature DB >> 24481825

Incidence of hip pain in a prospective cohort of asymptomatic volunteers: is the cam deformity a risk factor for hip pain?

Vickas Khanna1, Anthony Caragianis, Gina Diprimio, Kawan Rakhra, Paul E Beaulé.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although cam-type femoroacetabular impingement is commonly associated with labral chondral damage and hip pain, a large proportion of asymptomatic individuals will have this deformity.
PURPOSE: To determine the incidence of hip pain in a prospective cohort of volunteers who had undergone magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of their hips. STUDY
DESIGN: Case control study; Level of evidence, 3.
METHODS: A total of 200 asymptomatic volunteers who underwent an MRI of both hips were followed for a mean time of 4.4 years (range, 4.01-4.95 years). Thirty were lost to follow-up, leaving 170 individuals (77 males, 93 females) with a mean age of 29.5 years (range, 25.7-54.5 years). All patients were blinded to the results of their MRI. All completed a follow-up questionnaire inquiring about the presence of hip pain or a history of hip pain lasting longer than 6 weeks since the original MRI. Each patient was asked to draw where the pain was on a body diagram.
RESULTS: Eleven patients (5 males, 6 females; 6.5% of sample; mean age, 29.9 years; range, 25.7-45.6 years) reported hip pain, of which 3 (1 male, 2 females) had bilateral pain for a total of 14 hips. Seven of the 14 painful hips had a cam-type deformity at the time of the initial MRI versus 37 of the 318 nonpainful hips (P = .0002). This gave a relative risk of 4.3 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.3-7.8) of developing hip pain if cam deformity was present. Those 14 painful hips had a significantly greater alpha angle at the radial 1:30 clock position than did those who did not develop pain with a cam deformity: 61.5° (range, 57.3°-65.7°) versus 57.9° (range, 56.9°-59.1°), respectively (P = .05). A significantly greater proportion of patients (12%) with limited internal rotation ≤20° (versus 2.7% with internal rotation >20°) went on to develop hip pain (P = .009; relative risk = 3.1 [95% CI, 1.6-6.0]).
CONCLUSION: The presence of a cam deformity represents a significant risk factor for the development of hip pain. An elevated alpha angle at the 1:30 clock position and decreased internal rotation are associated with an increased risk of developing hip pain. However, not all patients with a cam deformity develop hip pain, and further research is needed to better define those at greater risk of developing degenerative symptoms.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cam; hip deformity; internal rotation; pain

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24481825     DOI: 10.1177/0363546513518417

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  28 in total

1.  Cam FAI and Smaller Neck Angles Increase Subchondral Bone Stresses During Squatting: A Finite Element Analysis.

Authors:  K C Geoffrey Ng; Giulia Mantovani; Mario Lamontagne; Michel R Labrosse; Paul E Beaulé
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Does Cartilage Degenerate in Asymptomatic Hips With Cam Morphology?

Authors:  George Grammatopoulos; Gerd Melkus; Kawan Rakhra; Paul E Beaulé
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Gluteus maximus contraction velocity assessed by tensiomyography improves following arthroscopic treatment of femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Roberto Seijas; Miguel Marín; Eila Rivera; Eduard Alentorn-Geli; David Barastegui; Pedro Álvarez-Díaz; Ramón Cugat
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-05-13       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Increased Hip Stresses Resulting From a Cam Deformity and Decreased Femoral Neck-Shaft Angle During Level Walking.

Authors:  K C Geoffrey Ng; Giulia Mantovani; Mario Lamontagne; Michel R Labrosse; Paul E Beaulé
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  The association of pre-operative body pain diagram scores with pain outcomes following total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  A J Dave; F Selzer; E Losina; I Usiskin; J E Collins; Y C Lee; P Band; D F Dalury; R Iorio; K Kindsfater; J N Katz
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 6.576

6.  Hip shape is symmetric, non-dependent on limb dominance and gender-specific: implications for femoroacetabular impingement. A 3D CT analysis in asymptomatic subjects.

Authors:  Vasco V Mascarenhas; Paulo Rego; Pedro Dantas; Miguel Castro; Lennart Jans; Rui M Marques; Nélia Gouveia; Francisco Soldado; Olufemi R Ayeni; José G Consciência
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Patient-specific anatomical and functional parameters provide new insights into the pathomechanism of cam FAI.

Authors:  K C Geoffrey Ng; Mario Lamontagne; Andrew P Adamczyk; Kawan S Rakhra; Kawan S Rahkra; Paul E Beaulé
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Cam deformity and the omega angle, a novel quantitative measurement of femoral head-neck morphology: a 3D CT gender analysis in asymptomatic subjects.

Authors:  Vasco V Mascarenhas; Paulo Rego; Pedro Dantas; Augusto Gaspar; Francisco Soldado; José G Consciência
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Acetabular Version Increases During Adolescence Secondary to Reduced Anterior Femoral Head Coverage.

Authors:  George Grammatopoulos; Paul Jamieson; Johanna Dobransky; Kawan Rakhra; Sasha Carsen; Paul E Beaulé
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Bony morphology of the hip in professional ballet dancers compared to athletes.

Authors:  Susan Mayes; April-Rose Ferris; Peter Smith; Andrew Garnham; Jill Cook
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-12-12       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.