Literature DB >> 24481604

Water-perfused esophageal high-resolution manometry: normal values and validation.

Boudewijn F Kessing1, Pim W Weijenborg, André J P M Smout, Sem Hillenius, Albert J Bredenoord.   

Abstract

Water-perfused high-resolution manometry (HRM) catheters with 36 unidirectional pressure channels have recently been developed, but normal values are not yet available. Furthermore, the technique has not been validated and compared with solid-state HRM. We therefore aimed to develop normal values for water-perfused HRM and to assess the level of agreement between water-perfused HRM and solid-state HRM. We included 50 healthy volunteers (mean age 35 yr, range 21-64 yr; 15 women, 35 men). Water-perfused HRM and solid-state HRM were performed in a randomized order. Normal values were calculated as 5th and 95th percentile ranges, and agreement between the two systems was assessed with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) statistics. The 5th-95th percentile range was 3.0-6.6 cm/s for contractile front velocity (CFV), 141.6-3,674 mmHg·s·cm for distal contractile integral (DCI), 6.2-8.7 s for distal contraction latency (DL), and 1.0-18.8 mmHg for integrated relaxation pressure (IRP 4s). Mean (SD) and ICC for water-perfused HRM and solid-state HRM were 4.4 (1.1) vs. 3.9 (0.9) cm/s, ICC: 0.49 for CFV; 1,189 (1,023) vs. 1,092 (1,019) mmHg·s·cm, ICC: 0.90 for DCI; 7.4 (0.8) vs. 6.9 (0.9) s, ICC: 0.50 for DL; and 8.1 (4.8) vs. 7.9 (5.1), ICC: 0.39 for IRP 4s. The normal values for this water-perfused HRM system are only slightly different from previously published values with solid-state HRM, and moderate to good agreement was observed between the two systems, with only small differences in outcome measures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  esophagus; normal values; pressure measurement; water-perfused manometry

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24481604     DOI: 10.1152/ajpgi.00447.2013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol        ISSN: 0193-1857            Impact factor:   4.052


  13 in total

1.  Pharmacologic interrogation of patients with esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction using amyl nitrite.

Authors:  Arash Babaei; Sadaf Shad; Aniko Szabo; Benson T Massey
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2019-06-25       Impact factor: 3.598

2.  Comparison of two high-resolution manometry software systems in evaluating esophageal motor function.

Authors:  A Rengarajan; J Drapekin; A Patel; C P Gyawali
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 3.598

3.  Significant pressure differences between solid-state and water-perfused systems in lower esophageal sphincter measurement.

Authors:  Philipp Gehwolf; Ronald A Hinder; Kenneth R DeVault; Michael Edlinger; Heinz F Wykypiel; Paul J Klingler
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-02-21       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Normal Values of High-Resolution Manometry in Supine and Upright Positions in a Thai Population.

Authors:  Pitichote Hiranyatheb; Suriya Chakkaphak; Supphamat Chirnaksorn; Pattaraporn Lekhaka; Kaimuk Petsrikun; Kornkanok Somboonpun
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Determinants of pressure drift in Manoscan(™) esophageal high-resolution manometry system.

Authors:  A Babaei; E C Lin; A Szabo; B T Massey
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2014-12-29       Impact factor: 3.598

6.  The Chicago Classification of esophageal motility disorders, v3.0.

Authors:  P J Kahrilas; A J Bredenoord; M Fox; C P Gyawali; S Roman; A J P M Smout; J E Pandolfino
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 3.598

7.  VALIDATION OF A NEW WATER-PERFUSED HIGH-RESOLUTION MANOMETRY SYSTEM.

Authors:  Rogério Mariotto; Fernando A M Herbella; Vera Lucia Ângelo Andrade; Francisco Schlottmann; Marco G Patti
Journal:  Arq Bras Cir Dig       Date:  2021-01-25

Review 8.  The Chicago classification of motility disorders: an update.

Authors:  Sabine Roman; C Prakash Gyawali; Yinglian Xiao; John E Pandolfino; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am       Date:  2014-08-01

9.  The Esophageal Manometry with Gas-perfused Catheters.

Authors:  Sven Höhne; Martin Arndt; Viola Hesse
Journal:  Open Med (Wars)       Date:  2018-06-14

10.  Variations in Clinical Practice of Esophageal High-resolution Manometry: A Nationwide Survey.

Authors:  Eun Jeong Gong; Soo In Choi; Bong Eun Lee; Yang Won Min; Yu Kyung Cho; Kee Wook Jung; Ji Hyun Kim; Moo In Park
Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 4.924

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.