OBJECTIVES: We report the prevalence and anatomical features of longitudinal stent deformation as detected by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) BACKGROUND: Angiographic studies have recently reported longitudinal stent deformation as a mechanical complication occurring during percutaneous coronary intervention; however, there are no IVUS studies on this phenomenon METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 1,489 consecutive stent-treated lesions in 1,057 patients who underwent IVUS post-stent implantation RESULTS: Seventeen longitudinal stent deformations in 17 lesions (1.1% per lesion) in 17 patients (1.6% per patient) were identified by IVUS. Of the 17 IVUS-detected deformations, only three deformations (17.6%) were detectable by angiography. By IVUS, there were three patterns of longitudinal stent deformation: (1) Deformation with intra-stent wrinkling and overlapping of the proximal and distal stent fragments within a single stent (n = 14), (2) deformation with elongation (n = 2), and (3) deformation with shortening (n = 1). Most of the deformations were located near to the proximal stent edge (88%), consistent with the finding that they were observed in 11 ostial (65%) and eight left main lesions (47%), and 8.3% of 96 left main stented lesions had evidence of deformation CONCLUSIONS: By IVUS, longitudinal stent deformation during percutaneous coronary intervention was seen more frequently than in previous studies; however, it is still uncommon (1.1%) except in the left main location. The most frequent pattern was intrastent wrinkling and overlapping of the proximal and distal stent fragments.
OBJECTIVES: We report the prevalence and anatomical features of longitudinal stent deformation as detected by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) BACKGROUND: Angiographic studies have recently reported longitudinal stent deformation as a mechanical complication occurring during percutaneous coronary intervention; however, there are no IVUS studies on this phenomenon METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 1,489 consecutive stent-treated lesions in 1,057 patients who underwent IVUS post-stent implantation RESULTS: Seventeen longitudinal stent deformations in 17 lesions (1.1% per lesion) in 17 patients (1.6% per patient) were identified by IVUS. Of the 17 IVUS-detected deformations, only three deformations (17.6%) were detectable by angiography. By IVUS, there were three patterns of longitudinal stent deformation: (1) Deformation with intra-stent wrinkling and overlapping of the proximal and distal stent fragments within a single stent (n = 14), (2) deformation with elongation (n = 2), and (3) deformation with shortening (n = 1). Most of the deformations were located near to the proximal stent edge (88%), consistent with the finding that they were observed in 11 ostial (65%) and eight left main lesions (47%), and 8.3% of 96 left main stented lesions had evidence of deformation CONCLUSIONS: By IVUS, longitudinal stent deformation during percutaneous coronary intervention was seen more frequently than in previous studies; however, it is still uncommon (1.1%) except in the left main location. The most frequent pattern was intrastent wrinkling and overlapping of the proximal and distal stent fragments.