Literature DB >> 24474565

Anogenital distance and its application in environmental health research.

Chunhua Liu1, Xijin Xu, Xia Huo.   

Abstract

Anogenital distance (AGD), a useful anthropometric measurement for genital development in both animals and humans, was originally found by reproductive toxicologists in rodent experiments. As an easy-to-measure and sensitive marker, AGD has become a bioassay of fetal androgen action and a well-established reproductive toxicity endpoint in animals. It is generally accepted that AGD is sexually dimorphic in many mammals, with males having longer AGD than females. Exposure to proposed endocrine disruptors may result in reduced AGD; thus, it has been used to measure health effects of compounds with endocrine-altering properties or endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) in environmental toxicology. Moreover, AGD is an important clinical measure to address endocrine-sensitive endpoints in the first year of life and to assess the adverse impact of in utero exposure to environmental EDCs. Recently, AGD has been identified as one of the endpoints in the US Environmental Protection Agency guidelines for reproductive toxicity studies in humans, but use of AGD in human studies is still rare, and the results remain mixed and inconclusive due to many reasons. In order to achieve a breakthrough, researchers are endeavoring to standardize the measurement of AGD, normalize age-specific population data in different ethnic groups, and conduct more in-depth human researches in this field.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24474565     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-014-2570-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  59 in total

Review 1.  Hormones and endocrine-disrupting chemicals: low-dose effects and nonmonotonic dose responses.

Authors:  Laura N Vandenberg; Theo Colborn; Tyrone B Hayes; Jerrold J Heindel; David R Jacobs; Duk-Hee Lee; Toshi Shioda; Ana M Soto; Frederick S vom Saal; Wade V Welshons; R Thomas Zoeller; John Peterson Myers
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 19.871

Review 2.  Phthalates and children's health.

Authors:  Sheela Sathyanarayana
Journal:  Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care       Date:  2008-02

3.  In utero exposure to the antiandrogen 1,1-dichloro-2,2-bis(p-chlorophenyl)ethylene (DDE) in relation to anogenital distance in male newborns from Chiapas, México.

Authors:  Matthew P Longnecker; Beth C Gladen; Lea A Cupul-Uicab; S Patricia Romano-Riquer; Jean-Phillipe Weber; Robert E Chapin; Mauricio Hernández-Avila
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2007-01-31       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Prenatal testosterone exposure permanently masculinizes anogenital distance, nipple development, and reproductive tract morphology in female Sprague-Dawley rats.

Authors:  Andrew K Hotchkiss; Christy S Lambright; Joseph S Ostby; Louise Parks-Saldutti; John G Vandenbergh; Leon E Gray
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2007-01-11       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 5.  The impact of endocrine disruptors on endocrine targets.

Authors:  E Diamanti-Kandarakis; E Palioura; S A Kandarakis; M Koutsilieris
Journal:  Horm Metab Res       Date:  2010-04-23       Impact factor: 2.936

6.  Decreased anogenital distance and increased incidence of undescended testes in fetuses of rats given monobenzyl phthalate, a major metabolite of butyl benzyl phthalate.

Authors:  Makoto Ema; Emiko Miyawaki; Akihiko Hirose; Eiichi Kamata
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.143

Review 7.  Reproductive toxicity of phthalate esters.

Authors:  Anderson Joel Martino-Andrade; Ibrahim Chahoud
Journal:  Mol Nutr Food Res       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.914

Review 8.  Associations among hypospadias, cryptorchidism, anogenital distance, and endocrine disruption.

Authors:  Michael H Hsieh; Benjamin N Breyer; Michael L Eisenberg; Laurence S Baskin
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.092

9.  Increase male genital diseases morbidity linked to informal electronic waste recycling in Guiyu, China.

Authors:  Xijin Xu; Yuling Zhang; Taofeek Akangbe Yekeen; Yan Li; Bingrong Zhuang; Xia Huo
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-11-24       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 10.  Large effects from small exposures. I. Mechanisms for endocrine-disrupting chemicals with estrogenic activity.

Authors:  Wade V Welshons; Kristina A Thayer; Barbara M Judy; Julia A Taylor; Edward M Curran; Frederick S vom Saal
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  9 in total

1.  Sex- and age-dependent effects of maternal organophosphate flame-retardant exposure on neonatal hypothalamic and hepatic gene expression.

Authors:  Samantha Adams; Kimberly Wiersielis; Ali Yasrebi; Kristie Conde; Laura Armstrong; Grace L Guo; Troy A Roepke
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 3.143

2.  Sex-specific ranges and ratios for anogenital distance among Thai full-term newborns.

Authors:  Nattakarn Numsriskulrat; Khomsak Srilanchakon; Chaiyat Pronprechatham; Sopon Pornkunwilai; Vichit Supornsilchai
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 2.567

3.  Anogenital distance as a phenotypic signature through infancy.

Authors:  Lærke Priskorn; Jørgen H Petersen; Niels Jørgensen; Henriette B Kyhl; Marianne S Andersen; Katharina M Main; Anna-Maria Andersson; Niels E Skakkebaek; Tina K Jensen
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 3.756

4.  Thyroid Hormone Status in Umbilical Cord Serum Is Positively Associated with Male Anogenital Distance.

Authors:  Rongju Liu; Xijin Xu; Yuling Zhang; Xiangbin Zheng; Stephani S Kim; Kim N Dietrich; Shuk-Mei Ho; Tiina Reponen; Aimin Chen; Xia Huo
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 5.958

5.  Maternal organophosphate flame-retardant exposure alters offspring feeding, locomotor and exploratory behaviors in a sexually-dimorphic manner in mice.

Authors:  Sabrina N Walley; Elizabeth A Krumm; Ali Yasrebi; Kimberly R Wiersielis; Sarah O'Leary; Taylor Tillery; Troy A Roepke
Journal:  J Appl Toxicol       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 3.446

Review 6.  Effects on Puberty of Nutrition-Mediated Endocrine Disruptors Employed in Agriculture.

Authors:  Anastasia Konstantina Sakali; Alexandra Bargiota; Ioannis G Fatouros; Athanasios Jamurtas; Djuro Macut; George Mastorakos; Maria Papagianni
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-11-22       Impact factor: 5.717

7.  Anogenital distance is associated with semen quality but not reproductive hormones in 1106 young men from the general population.

Authors:  L Priskorn; A K Bang; L Nordkap; M Krause; J Mendiola; T K Jensen; A Juul; N E Skakkebaek; S H Swan; N Jørgensen
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 8.  Anogenital distance as a marker of androgen exposure in humans.

Authors:  A Thankamony; V Pasterski; K K Ong; C L Acerini; I A Hughes
Journal:  Andrology       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 3.842

Review 9.  Do endocrine disruptors cause hypospadias?

Authors:  Sisir Botta; Gerald R Cunha; Laurence S Baskin
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2014-12
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.