Literature DB >> 24473907

Colonoscopic factors associated with adenoma detection in a national colorectal cancer screening program.

Thomas J W Lee1, Colin J Rees2, Roger G Blanks3, Sue M Moss4, Claire Nickerson5, Karen C Wright4, Peter W James6, Richard J Q McNally6, Julietta Patnick5, Matthew D Rutter1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Adenoma detection is a key objective of colonoscopy, particularly in the context of colorectal cancer screening. The aim of this observational study was to identify the technical colonoscopy factors associated with adenoma detection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study analyzed data from the English Bowel Cancer Screening Programme. The indication for all colonoscopies was a positive fecal occult blood test. The relationships between the following colonoscopy factors and adenoma detection (one or more adenomas, advanced adenomas, right-sided adenomas, and total number of adenomas) were examined in multivariable analyses: bowel preparation quality, cecal intubation, withdrawal time, rectal retroversion, colonoscopist experience, antispasmodic use, sedation use, and start time of procedure. The following patient factors were controlled for: age, sex, body mass index, smoking, alcohol, deprivation, and geographical location.
RESULTS: A total of 31088 colonoscopies were analyzed. The following technical factors increased the relative risk of adenoma detection (P < 0.001 in multivariable analysis unless otherwise stated): cecal intubation, increased withdrawal time, higher quality bowel preparation, intravenous antispasmodic use, earlier procedure start time within a session (P = 0.018), and greater colonoscopist experience. Detection of advanced and right-sided adenomas also increased with these factors. Adenoma detection did not differ between sedated and unsedated colonoscopy (P = 0.143).
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated important associations between colonoscopy practice and adenoma detection. Use of intravenous antispasmodic was associated with increased adenoma detection. The effect of the start time of colonoscopy suggests that endoscopist fatigue may have a deleterious impact on adenoma detection. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24473907     DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1358831

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  45 in total

1.  Improved bowel preparation increases polyp detection and unmasks significant polyp miss rate.

Authors:  Ioannis S Papanikolaou; Athanasios D Sioulas; Nektarios Magdalinos; Iosif Beintaris; Lazaros-Dimitrios Lazaridis; Dimitrios Polymeros; Chrysoula Malli; George D Dimitriadis; Konstantinos Triantafyllou
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 1.337

2.  Patient- and procedure-related factors affecting proximal and distal detection rates for polyps and adenomas: results from 1603 screening colonoscopies.

Authors:  Christoph Schramm; Nadine Mbaya; Jeremy Franklin; Muenevver Demir; Fabian Kuetting; Ulrich Toex; Tobias Goeser; Hans-Michael Steffen
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-08-15       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Impact of photodocumentation of caecal intubation on colonoscopy outcomes.

Authors:  Brendan Moran; Rishabh Sehgal; Neil O'Morain; Eoin Slattery; Chris Collins
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 1.568

4.  Adenoma detection rates decline with increasing procedural hours in an endoscopist's workload.

Authors:  Majid A Almadi; Maida Sewitch; Alan N Barkun; Myriam Martel; Lawrence Joseph
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2015-05-21

Review 5.  Antispasmodic drugs in colonoscopy: a review of their pharmacology, safety and efficacy in improving polyp detection and related outcomes.

Authors:  Santosh Sanagapalli; Kriti Agnihotri; Rupert Leong; Crispin John Corte
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 4.409

6.  Endoscopist fatigue estimates and colonoscopic adenoma detection in a large community-based setting.

Authors:  Alexander Lee; Christopher D Jensen; Amy R Marks; Wei K Zhao; Chyke A Doubeni; Ann G Zauber; Virginia P Quinn; Theodore R Levin; Douglas A Corley
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 7.  Strategies to Increase Adenoma Detection Rates.

Authors:  Eelco C Brand; Michael B Wallace
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-03

8.  A novel summary report of colonoscopy: timeline visualization providing meaningful colonoscopy video information.

Authors:  Minwoo Cho; Jee Hyun Kim; Hyoun Joong Kong; Kyoung Sup Hong; Sungwan Kim
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Annual colonoscopy volume and maintenance of competency for surgeons.

Authors:  David Pace; Mark Borgaonkar; Brad Evans; Curtis Marcoux; Muna Lougheed; Vanessa Falk; Nikita Hickey; Meghan O'Leary; Jerry McGrath; Darrel Boone
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Colorectal neoplasms in melanosis coli: a survey in Japan and a worldwide meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ryo Katsumata; Noriaki Manabe; Minoru Fujita; Maki Ayaki; Aya Sunago; Tomoari Kamada; Yasumasa Monobe; Hirofumi Kawamoto; Ken Haruma
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.