Literature DB >> 24469310

The ecology of spatial memory in four lemur species.

Alexandra G Rosati1, Kerri Rodriguez, Brian Hare.   

Abstract

Evolutionary theories suggest that ecology is a major factor shaping cognition in primates. However, there have been few systematic tests of spatial memory abilities involving multiple primate species. Here, we examine spatial memory skills in four strepsirrhine primates that vary in level of frugivory: ruffed lemurs (Varecia sp.), ring-tailed lemurs (Lemur catta), mongoose lemurs (Eulemur mongoz), and Coquerel's sifakas (Propithecus coquereli). We compare these species across three studies targeting different aspects of spatial memory: recall after a long-delay, learning mechanisms supporting memory and recall of multiple locations in a complex environment. We find that ruffed lemurs, the most frugivorous species, consistently showed more robust spatial memory than the other species across tasks-especially in comparison with sifakas, the most folivorous species. We discuss these results in terms of the importance of considering both ecological and social factors as complementary explanations for the evolution of primate cognitive skills.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24469310     DOI: 10.1007/s10071-014-0727-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Cogn        ISSN: 1435-9448            Impact factor:   3.084


  10 in total

1.  Social inhibitory control in five lemur species.

Authors:  Rachna B Reddy; Evan L MacLean; Aaron A Sandel; Brian Hare
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 2.163

2.  Interaction of memory systems is controlled by context in both food-storing and non-storing birds.

Authors:  Emily Kathryn Brown; Caroline G Strang; David F Sherry; Robert R Hampton
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  Heterochrony in chimpanzee and bonobo spatial memory development.

Authors:  Alexandra G Rosati
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 2.963

4.  Macaque species with varying social tolerance show no differences in understanding what other agents perceive.

Authors:  Alyssa M Arre; Ellen Stumph; Laurie R Santos
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 2.899

5.  Does opportunistic testing bias cognitive performance in primates? Learning from drop-outs.

Authors:  Michèle N Schubiger; Alexandra Kissling; Judith M Burkart
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-20       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  What animals do not do or fail to find: A novel observational approach for studying cognition in the wild.

Authors:  Karline R L Janmaat
Journal:  Evol Anthropol       Date:  2019-08-16

Review 7.  Identifying animal complex cognition requires natural complexity.

Authors:  Christophe Boesch
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2021-02-18

8.  Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) navigate to find hidden fruit in a virtual environment.

Authors:  Matthias Allritz; Josep Call; Ken Schweller; Emma S McEwen; Miguel de Guinea; Karline R L Janmaat; Charles R Menzel; Francine L Dolins
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 14.957

9.  Are generalists more innovative than specialists? A comparison of innovative abilities in two wild sympatric mouse lemur species.

Authors:  Johanna Henke-von der Malsburg; Claudia Fichtel
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-08-15       Impact factor: 2.963

10.  The evolution of quantitative sensitivity.

Authors:  Margaret A H Bryer; Sarah E Koopman; Jessica F Cantlon; Steven T Piantadosi; Evan L MacLean; Joseph M Baker; Michael J Beran; Sarah M Jones; Kerry E Jordan; Salif Mahamane; Andreas Nieder; Bonnie M Perdue; Friederike Range; Jeffrey R Stevens; Masaki Tomonaga; Dorottya J Ujfalussy; Jennifer Vonk
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-12-27       Impact factor: 6.671

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.