Alexandra G Rosati1,2. 1. Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. 2. Department of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The emergence of human-unique cognitive abilities has been linked to our species' extended juvenile period. Comparisons of cognitive development across species can provide new insights into the evolutionary mechanisms shaping cognition. This study examined the development of different components of spatial memory, cognitive mechanisms that support complex foraging, by comparing two species with similar life history that vary in wild ecology: bonobos (Pan paniscus) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Spatial memory development was assessed using a cross-sectional experimental design comparing apes ranging from infancy to adulthood. Study 1 tested 73 sanctuary-living apes on a task examining recall of a single location after a 1-week delay, compared to an earlier session. Study 2 tested their ability to recall multiple locations within a complex environment. Study 3 examined a subset of individuals from Study 2 on a motivational control task. RESULTS: In Study 1, younger bonobos and chimpanzees of all ages exhibited improved performance in the test session compared to their initial learning experience. Older bonobos, in contrast, did not exhibit a memory boost in performance after the delay. In Study 2, older chimpanzees exhibited an improved ability to recall multiple locations, whereas bonobos did not exhibit any age-related differences. In Study 3, both species were similarly motivated to search for food in the absence of memory demands. DISCUSSION: These results indicate that closely related species with similar life history characteristics can exhibit divergent patterns of cognitive development, and suggests a role of socioecological niche in shaping patterns of cognition in Pan.
OBJECTIVES: The emergence of human-unique cognitive abilities has been linked to our species' extended juvenile period. Comparisons of cognitive development across species can provide new insights into the evolutionary mechanisms shaping cognition. This study examined the development of different components of spatial memory, cognitive mechanisms that support complex foraging, by comparing two species with similar life history that vary in wild ecology: bonobos (Pan paniscus) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Spatial memory development was assessed using a cross-sectional experimental design comparing apes ranging from infancy to adulthood. Study 1 tested 73 sanctuary-living apes on a task examining recall of a single location after a 1-week delay, compared to an earlier session. Study 2 tested their ability to recall multiple locations within a complex environment. Study 3 examined a subset of individuals from Study 2 on a motivational control task. RESULTS: In Study 1, younger bonobos and chimpanzees of all ages exhibited improved performance in the test session compared to their initial learning experience. Older bonobos, in contrast, did not exhibit a memory boost in performance after the delay. In Study 2, older chimpanzees exhibited an improved ability to recall multiple locations, whereas bonobos did not exhibit any age-related differences. In Study 3, both species were similarly motivated to search for food in the absence of memory demands. DISCUSSION: These results indicate that closely related species with similar life history characteristics can exhibit divergent patterns of cognitive development, and suggests a role of socioecological niche in shaping patterns of cognition in Pan.
Authors: Emily A Mankin; Fraser T Sparks; Begum Slayyeh; Robert J Sutherland; Stefan Leutgeb; Jill K Leutgeb Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2012-11-06 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Armin P Moczek; Karen E Sears; Angelika Stollewerk; Patricia J Wittkopp; Pamela Diggle; Ian Dworkin; Cristina Ledon-Rettig; David Q Matus; Siegfried Roth; Ehab Abouheif; Federico D Brown; Chi-Hua Chiu; C Sarah Cohen; Anthony W De Tomaso; Scott F Gilbert; Brian Hall; Alan C Love; Deirdre C Lyons; Thomas J Sanger; Joel Smith; Chelsea Specht; Mario Vallejo-Marin; Cassandra G Extavour Journal: Evol Dev Date: 2015 May-Jun Impact factor: 1.930
Authors: Dylan M Nielson; Troy A Smith; Vishnu Sreekumar; Simon Dennis; Per B Sederberg Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2015-08-17 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Megan F Cole; Averill Cantwell; Joshua Rukundo; Lilly Ajarova; Sofia Fernandez-Navarro; Rebeca Atencia; Alexandra G Rosati Journal: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci Date: 2020-09-21 Impact factor: 6.671