Literature DB >> 34918201

Interaction of memory systems is controlled by context in both food-storing and non-storing birds.

Emily Kathryn Brown1, Caroline G Strang2, David F Sherry2, Robert R Hampton3.   

Abstract

Animals and humans have multiple memory systems. While both black-capped chickadees (Poecile atricapillus) and dark-eyed juncos (Junco hyemalis) are under selective pressure to remember reliable long-term spatial locations (habit memory), chickadees must additionally quickly form and rapidly update spatial memory for unique cache sites (one-trial memory). We conducted a series of three experiments in which we assessed the degree to which habit and one-trial memory were expressed in both species as a function of training context. In Experiment 1, birds failed to demonstrate habits on probe trials after being trained in the context of a biased Match-to-Sample task in which the same high-frequency target was always correct. In Experiment 2, habit strongly controlled performance when habits were learned as Discriminations, defining a specific training context. In Experiment 3, context no longer defined when to express habits and habit and one-trial memory competed for control of behavior. Across all experiments, birds preferentially used the memory system at test that was consistent with the context in which it was acquired. Although the memory adaptations that allow chickadees to successfully recover cached food might predispose them to favor one-trial memory, we found no species differences in the weighting of habit and one-trial memory. In the experiments here, context was a powerful factor controlling the interaction of memory systems.
© 2021. The Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chickadee; Habit; One-trial memory; Process dissociation paradigm

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34918201      PMCID: PMC8983471          DOI: 10.3758/s13420-021-00496-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Behav        ISSN: 1543-4494            Impact factor:   1.986


  37 in total

1.  Species differences in spatial memory among Clark's nutcrackers, scrub jays, and pigeons.

Authors:  D J Olson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1991-10

Review 2.  Factors that influence the relative use of multiple memory systems.

Authors:  Mark G Packard; Jarid Goodman
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.899

3.  Memory systems interaction in the pigeon: working and reference memory.

Authors:  William A Roberts; Caroline Strang; Krista Macpherson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 2.478

4.  Nonnavigational spatial memory performance is unaffected by hippocampal damage in monkeys.

Authors:  Benjamin M Basile; Robert R Hampton
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2018-09-02       Impact factor: 3.899

5.  Variation in memory and the hippocampus across populations from different climates: a common garden approach.

Authors:  Timothy C Roth; Lara D LaDage; Cody A Freas; Vladimir V Pravosudov
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Learning capabilities enhanced in harsh environments: a common garden approach.

Authors:  Timothy C Roth; Lara D LaDage; Vladimir V Pravosudov
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Consolidation and reconsolidation of memory in black-capped chickadees (Poecile atricapillus).

Authors:  Matthew C Barrett; David F Sherry
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 1.912

8.  Dissociation of active working memory and passive recognition in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Benjamin M Basile; Robert R Hampton
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2012-12-31

9.  Contrasting styles in cognition and behaviour in bumblebees and honeybees.

Authors:  David F Sherry; Caroline G Strang
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 1.777

10.  Sex Differences in Spatial Memory in Brown-Headed Cowbirds: Males Outperform Females on a Touchscreen Task.

Authors:  Mélanie F Guigueno; Scott A MacDougall-Shackleton; David F Sherry
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.