Literature DB >> 24468568

Communication with parents concerning withholding or withdrawing of life-sustaining interventions in neonatology.

Annie Janvier1, Keith Barrington2, Barbara Farlow3.   

Abstract

The nature and content of the conversations between the healthcare team and the parents concerning withholding or withdrawing of life-sustaining interventions for neonates vary greatly. These depend upon the status of the infant; for some neonates, death may be imminent, while other infants may be relatively stable, yet with a potential risk for surviving with severe disability. Healthcare providers also need to communicate with prospective parents before the birth of premature infants or neonates with uncertain outcomes. Many authors recommend that parents of fragile neonates receive detailed information about the potential outcomes of their children and the choices they have provided in an unbiased and empathetic manner. However, the exact manner this is to be achieved in clinical practice remains unclear. Parents and healthcare providers may have different values regarding the provision of life-sustaining interventions. However, parents base their decisions on many factors, not just probabilities. The role of emotions, regret, hope, quality of life, resilience, and relationships is rarely discussed. End-of-life discussions with parents should be individualized and personalized. This article suggests ways to personalize these conversations. The mnemonic "SOBPIE" may help providers have fruitful discussions: (1) What is the Situation? Is the baby imminently dying? Should withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining interventions be considered? (2) Opinions and options: personal biases of healthcare professionals and alternatives for patients. (3) Basic human interactions. (4) Parents: their story, their concerns, their needs, and their goals. (5) Information: meeting parental informational needs and providing balanced information. (6) Emotions: relational aspects of decision making which include the following: emotions, social supports, coping with uncertainty, adaptation, and resilience. In this paper, we consider some aspects of this complex process.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BPD; CPR; Communication; ELGAN; Emotions; Empathy; End-of-life decisions; Extreme prematurity; Family-centered care; GA; Life-sustaining interventions; NEC; NICU; Neonatology; PMA; Palliative care; Personalized medicine; Withhold and withdraw intensive care; bronchopulmonary dysplasia; cardiopulmonary resuscitation; extremely low-gestational-age infants; gestational age; necrotizing enterocolitis; neonatal intensive care unit; post-menstrual age

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24468568     DOI: 10.1053/j.semperi.2013.07.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Perinatol        ISSN: 0146-0005            Impact factor:   3.300


  33 in total

1.  Communicating With Pediatric Families at End-of-Life Is Not a Fantasy.

Authors:  Connie M Ulrich; Kim Mooney-Doyle; Christine Grady
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 11.229

2.  End-of-life care in a regional level IV neonatal intensive care unit after implementation of a palliative care initiative.

Authors:  C Samsel; B E Lechner
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 2.521

Review 3.  Children's complex care needs: a systematic concept analysis of multidisciplinary language.

Authors:  Maria Brenner; Claire Kidston; Carol Hilliard; Imelda Coyne; Jessica Eustace-Cook; Carmel Doyle; Thelma Begley; Michael J Barrett
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 3.183

4.  Prospective parents' perspectives on antenatal decision making for the anticipated birth of a periviable infant.

Authors:  Brownsyne Tucker Edmonds; Teresa A Savage; Robert E Kimura; Sarah J Kilpatrick; Miriam Kuppermann; William Grobman; Karen Kavanaugh
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2017-11-05

5.  Counselling and management for anticipated extremely preterm birth.

Authors:  Brigitte Lemyre; Gregory Moore
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 2.253

Review 6.  Shared decision making for infants born at the threshold of viability: a prognosis-based guideline.

Authors:  B Lemyre; T Daboval; S Dunn; M Kekewich; G Jones; D Wang; M Mason-Ward; G P Moore
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 2.521

7.  Field testing of decision coaching with a decision aid for parents facing extreme prematurity.

Authors:  G P Moore; B Lemyre; T Daboval; S Ding; S Dunn; S Akiki; N Barrowman; A L Shephard; M L Lawson
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 2.521

8.  Comparing obstetricians' and neonatologists' approaches to periviable counseling.

Authors:  B Tucker Edmonds; F McKenzie; J E Panoch; A E Barnato; R M Frankel
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 2.521

Review 9.  Historical Perspectives: Shared Decision Making in the NICU.

Authors:  Anne Sullivan; Christy Cummings
Journal:  Neoreviews       Date:  2020-04

10.  Shared decision making during antenatal counselling for anticipated extremely preterm birth.

Authors:  Conor Barker; Sandra Dunn; Gregory P Moore; Jessica Reszel; Brigitte Lemyre; Thierry Daboval
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 2.253

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.