Literature DB >> 24467871

The biomechanical aspects of reconstruction for segmental defects of the mandible: a finite element study to assess the optimisation of plate and screw factors.

Péter Bujtár1, János Simonovics2, Károly Váradi3, George K B Sándor4, C M E Avery5.   

Abstract

A bone plate is required to restore the load-bearing capacity of the mandible following a segmental resection. A good understanding of the underlying principles is crucial for developing a reliable reconstruction. A finite element analysis (FEA) technique has been developed to study the biomechanics of the clinical scenarios managed after surgical resection of a tumour or severe trauma to assist in choosing the optimal hardware elements. A computer aided design (CAD) model of an edentulous human mandible was created. Then 4 common segmental defects were simulated. A single reconstruction plate was designed to span the defects. The hardware variations studied were: monocortical or bicortical screw fixation and non-locking or locking plate design. A standardized load was applied to mimic the human bite. The von Mises stress and strain, spatial changes at the screw-bone interfaces were analysed. In general, the locking plate and monocortical screw fixation systems were most effective. Non-locking plating systems produced larger screw "pull-out" displacements, especially at the hemimandible (up to 5% strain). Three screws on either side of the defect were adequate for all scenarios except extensive unilateral defects when additional screws and an increased screw diameter are recommended. The simplification of screw geometry may underestimate stress levels and factors such as poor adaptation of the plate or reduced bone quality are likely to be indications for bicortical locking screw fixation. The current model provides a good basis for understanding the complex biomechanics and developing future refinements in plate or scaffold design.
Copyright © 2013 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomechanics; Finite element analysis; Mandible; Modelling; Stability

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24467871     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2013.12.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg        ISSN: 1010-5182            Impact factor:   2.078


  6 in total

1.  Improving mandibular reconstruction by using topology optimization, patient specific design and additive manufacturing?-A biomechanical comparison against miniplates on human specimen.

Authors:  Jan J Lang; Mirjam Bastian; Peter Foehr; Michael Seebach; Jochen Weitz; Constantin von Deimling; Benedikt J Schwaiger; Carina M Micheler; Nikolas J Wilhelm; Christian U Grosse; Marco Kesting; Rainer Burgkart
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Biomechanical In Vitro Study on the Stability of Patient-Specific CAD/CAM Mandibular Reconstruction Plates: A Comparison Between Selective Laser Melted, Milled, and Hand-Bent Plates.

Authors:  Robin Kasper; Karsten Winter; Sebastian Pietzka; Alexander Schramm; Frank Wilde
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2020-08-28

3.  Customized mandibular reconstruction plates improve mechanical performance in a mandibular reconstruction model.

Authors:  Ralf Gutwald; Raimund Jaeger; Floor M Lambers
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2016-11-25       Impact factor: 1.763

4.  The Use of Customized Three-Dimensionally Printed Mandible Prostheses with a Pressure-Reducing Device: A Finite Element Analysis in Different Chewing Positions, Biomechanical Testing, and In Vivo Animal Study Using Lanyu Pigs.

Authors:  Chun-Feng Chen; Chun-Ming Chen; Han-Sheng Chen; Wei-Chin Huang; Yung-Chung Chen; Hung-Chih Chang; Sung-Ho Liu; Tsung-Lung Yang; Ling-Lin Wang; Ping-Ho Chen
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 5.  Comparison of Bite Force with Locking Plates versus Non-Locking Plates in the Treatment of Mandibular Fractures: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  José Cristiano Ramos Glória; Ighor Andrade Fernandes; Esmeralda Maria da Silveira; Glaciele Maria de Souza; Ricardo Lopes Rocha; Endi Lanza Galvão; Saulo Gabriel Moreira Falci
Journal:  Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-07-14

Review 6.  Patient-specific finite element models of the human mandible: Lack of consensus on current set-ups.

Authors:  Bram Barteld Jan Merema; Joep Kraeima; Haye H Glas; Fred K L Spijkervet; Max J H Witjes
Journal:  Oral Dis       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 3.511

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.