Literature DB >> 24467630

Evolution of the Southampton Enhanced Recovery Programme for radical cystectomy and the aggregation of marginal gains.

Julian Smith1, Zhao Wu Meng, Richard Lockyer, Tim Dudderidge, John McGrath, Matthew Hayes, Brian Birch.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe and assess the evolution of an enhanced recovery programme (ERP) for open radical cystectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We introduced a mentored ERP for radical cystectomy in January 2011. The programme underwent service evaluation and multiple changes in August 2012 that we define as marginal gains. We present a retrospective review of 133 consecutive patients undergoing open radical cystectomy, grouped according to the three stages of the ERP from October 2008 to April 2013: (1) non-ERP group (October 2008 to December 2010): n = 69; (2) ERP-1 group (January 2011 to July 2012): n = 37; and (3) ERP-2 group (August 2012 to April 2013): n = 27. Primary outcomes were length of hospital stay (LOS), readmission, morbidity at 90 days using the Clavien classification system and mortality. Secondary outcomes were time to flatus, ileus rates, re-operation rates and oncological outcomes.
RESULTS: There were no differences in patient demographics among any of the groups for: age, gender, BMI, American Society of Anesthesiologists score and the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. There were no differences in readmission, morbidity and mortality rates. The overall 90-day mortality was six patients (4.5%). There were significant differences in ileus rates between the non-ERP, the ERP-1 and the ERP-2 groups: 44.9% (31 patients), 29.7% (11 patients) and 14.8% (four patients), respectively (P = 0.017). There was a significant difference in the presence of pathological lymphadenopathy in the ERP-2 group: non-ERP group, 10.1%; ERP-1 group, 16.2%; and ERP-2 group, 44.4%; P = 0.002. There was also a difference in the mean (sd) lymph node yield in ERP-2: non-ERP group, 8.4 (5.4) nodes; ERP-1, 8.2 (6.4) nodes; and ERP-2, 16.7 (5.4) nodes (P < 0.001). The median (range) LOS was 14 (7-91) days, 10 (6-55) days and 7 (3-99) days in the non-ERP, ERP-1 and ERP-2 groups, respectively (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Auditing an already successful ERP and implementing a number of marginal gains has led to a significant decrease in the median LOS for radical cystectomy. The LOS for open radical cystectomy at University Hospital Southampton has halved. In the second phase of our ERP, our median LOS is 7 days.
© 2014 The Authors. BJU International © 2014 BJU International.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ERAS; ERP; enhanced recovery after surgery; enhanced recovery programme; fast track surgery; radical cystectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24467630     DOI: 10.1111/bju.12644

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  15 in total

Review 1.  The Role of Robotics in the Invasive Management of Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Pramit Khetrapal; Wei Shen Tan; Benjamin Lamb; Melanie Tan; Hilary Baker; James Thompson; Ashwin Sridhar; John D Kelly; Tim Briggs
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 2.  Enhanced recovery programmes for patients undergoing radical cystectomy.

Authors:  Julian Smith; Raj S Pruthi; John McGrath
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 3.  Preoperative and modifiable factors to lower postoperative complications after radical cystectomy.

Authors:  Marie C Hupe; Mario W Kramer; Axel S Merseburger
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  Enhancing the emergency general surgical service: an example of the aggregation of marginal gains.

Authors:  I G Panagiotopoulou; Jmh Bennett; E M Tweedle; S Di Saverio; S Gourgiotis; R H Hardwick; Jmd Wheeler; R Justin Davies
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  Evaluation of an enhanced recovery protocol on patients having radical cystectomy for bladder cancer.

Authors:  Bonnie Liu; Trustin Domes; Kunal Jana
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 1.862

6.  Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) following radical cystectomy: is it worth implementing for all patients?

Authors:  Peter Hanna; Joseph Zabell; Yasser Osman; Mohamed M Hussein; Magdy Mostafa; Christopher Weight; Badrinath Konety
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Surgical placement of rectus sheath catheters in a cadaveric cystectomy model.

Authors:  Ecp Chedgy; G Lowe; R Tang; C Krebs; A Sawka; H Vaghadia; M E Gleave; A I So
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 1.891

8.  A prospective randomized pilot study evaluating an ERAS protocol versus a standard protocol for patients treated with radical cystectomy and urinary diversion for bladder cancer.

Authors:  Sebastian Karl Frees; Jonathan Aning; Peter Black; Werner Struss; Robert Bell; Claudia Chavez-Munoz; Martin Gleave; Alan I So
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 9.  Enhanced Recovery Pathways Versus Standard Care After Cystectomy: A Meta-analysis of the Effect on Perioperative Outcomes.

Authors:  Mark D Tyson; Sam S Chang
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2016-06-11       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 10.  'Blood doping' from Armstrong to prehabilitation: manipulation of blood to improve performance in athletes and physiological reserve in patients.

Authors:  James O M Plumb; James M Otto; Michael P W Grocott
Journal:  Extrem Physiol Med       Date:  2016-02-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.