Literature DB >> 24464385

Postoperative pain after transvaginal cholecystectomy: single-center, double-blind, randomized controlled trial.

Dietmar H Borchert1, Matthias Federlein, Frauke Fritze-Büttner, Jens Burghardt, Britta Liersch-Löhn, Yüksel Atas, Verena Müller, Oskar Rückbeil, Stefan Wagenpfeil, Stefan Gräber, Klaus Gellert.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) has the potential to reduce postoperative pain. We compared postoperative pain in the hybrid NOTES procedure transvaginal video-assisted cholecystectomy (TVC) with standard conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CLC).
DESIGN: Single-center, double-blind, randomized controlled trial in a level II hospital between June 2008 and June 2012.
METHODS: Female patients, older than 18 years of age with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis were randomized to receive either TVC or CLC. The follow-up period was 7 days and the primary outcome of the study was postoperative pain. We hypothesized that there is no reduction of pain (Visual Rating Scale ≥1) while resting or coughing over a 48-h period after the operation. Secondary outcome included wound infections, complications, and patient reported outcomes. Sealed envelopes with computer-generated randomization information were kept for allocation in theater. All patients received opaque wound dressing, as in standard four-trocar cholecystectomy and a vaginal tamponade. Theater protocol and surgical notes were kept separate after the procedure.
RESULTS: Overall, 97 of 426 patients assessed for participation were randomized for either TVC or CLC. A total of 41 patients had a TVC and 51 had a CLC. Five patients were excluded from the analysis. There was no difference in age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade, or hospital stay, but anesthetic and surgical times were significantly longer in TVC (p < 0.001). There was no statistical difference in postoperative pain between the two groups while resting or coughing. Complications included conversion to laparotomy, bleeding, wound infections, and re-admission. No difference in the rate of complications between the two groups was seen. Overall, 86 and 93% of CLC and TVC patients, respectively, would recommend the procedure to other patients.
CONCLUSION: In this study, no significant difference in pain on days 1 and 2 postoperatively between the two methods was found. The safety profile of TVC is comparable to CLC, and TVC patients would generally recommend this procedure to other patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24464385     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-013-3409-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  26 in total

1.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus mini-laparotomy cholecystectomy: a prospective, randomized, single-blind study.

Authors:  A Ros; L Gustafsson; H Krook; C E Nordgren; A Thorell; G Wallin; E Nilsson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Complications of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: a series of 102 patients.

Authors:  Stephanie G Wood; Lucian Panait; Andrew J Duffy; Robert L Bell; Kurt E Roberts
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  [Comparison between transvaginal and laparoscopic cholecystectomy - a retrospective case-control study].

Authors:  M Hensel; U Schernikau; A Schmidt; G Arlt
Journal:  Zentralbl Chir       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 0.942

Review 4.  A proposal to use confidence intervals for visual analog scale data for pain measurement to determine clinical significance.

Authors:  S Mantha; R Thisted; J Foss; J E Ellis; M F Roizen
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 5.108

Review 5.  Clinical versus statistical significance in the assessment of pain relief.

Authors:  K H Todd
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 5.721

Review 6.  Pain and convalescence after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  T Bisgaard; H Kehlet; J Rosenberg
Journal:  Eur J Surg       Date:  2001-02

7.  Transvaginal-hybrid vs. single-port-access vs. 'conventional' laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Maik Kilian; Wieland Raue; Charalambos Menenakos; Brit Wassersleben; Jens Hartmann
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2011-03-08       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 8.  Is smaller necessarily better? A systematic review comparing the effects of minilaparoscopic and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy on patient outcomes.

Authors:  Rory McCloy; Delia Randall; Stephan A Schug; Henrik Kehlet; Christian Simanski; Francis Bonnet; Frederic Camu; Barrie Fischer; Girish Joshi; Narinder Rawal; Edmund A M Neugebauer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-09-20       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Transvaginal NOTES hybrid cholecystectomy: feasibility results in 68 cases with mid-term follow-up.

Authors:  C Zornig; H Mofid; L Siemssen; A Emmermann; M Alm; H-A von Waldenfels; C Felixmüller
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2009-05-05       Impact factor: 10.093

10.  Transvaginal/transumbilical hybrid--NOTES--versus 3-trocar needlescopic cholecystectomy: short-term results of a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Dirk Rolf Bulian; Jürgen Knuth; Nicola Cerasani; Axel Sauerwald; Rolf Lefering; Markus Maria Heiss
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  13 in total

1.  Systematic analysis of the safety and benefits of transvaginal hybrid-NOTES cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Dirk R Bulian; Jurgen Knuth; Kai S Lehmann; Axel Sauerwald; Markus M Heiss
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  New minimally invasive approaches for cholecystectomy: Review of literature.

Authors:  Martin Gaillard; Hadrien Tranchart; Panagiotis Lainas; Ibrahim Dagher
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-10-27

Review 3.  Comprehensive complication index for NOTES procedures: results from a randomized controlled trial and comparison to published NOTES complication data.

Authors:  Dietmar H Borchert; Matthias Federlein; Verena A Müller; Stefan Wagenpfeil; Robert M Eisele
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-12-25       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Transrectal rigid-hybrid NOTES cholecystectomy can be performed without peritoneal contamination: a controlled porcine survival study.

Authors:  Philip C Müller; Jonas D Senft; Philip Gath; Daniel C Steinemann; Felix Nickel; Adrian T Billeter; Beat P Müller-Stich; Georg R Linke
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Transvaginal hybrid NOTES cholecystectomy--results of a randomized clinical trial after 6 months.

Authors:  Dirk Rolf Bulian; Jurgen Knuth; Nicola Cerasani; Jonas Lange; Michael Alfred Ströhlein; Axel Sauerwald; Markus Maria Heiss
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2014-06-22       Impact factor: 3.445

6.  [Transvaginal cholecystectomy: results of a randomized study].

Authors:  M Federlein; V A Müller; F Fritze-Büttner; J Burghardt; S Gräber; K Gellert; D H Borchert
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 0.955

7.  Less pain after transvaginal cholecystectomy: single-center pooled analysis.

Authors:  Dietmar H Borchert; Matthias Federlein; Oskar Rückbeil; Jakob Schöpe
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Does obesity influence the results in Transvaginal Hybrid-NOTES cholecystectomy?

Authors:  Dirk R Bulian; Jurgen Knuth; Panagiotis Thomaidis; Anna Rieger; Claudia Simone Seefeldt; Jonas Lange; Jurgen Meyer; Michael A Stroehlein; Markus M Heiss
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  The transvaginal hybrid NOTES versus conventionally assisted laparoscopic sigmoid resection for diverticular disease (TRANSVERSAL) trial: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jonas D Senft; Rene Warschkow; Markus K Diener; Ignazio Tarantino; Daniel C Steinemann; Sebastian Lamm; Thomas Simon; Andreas Zerz; Beat P Müller-Stich; Georg R Linke
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 10.  Safety of transvaginal hybrid NOTES cholecystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mikael H Sodergren; Sheraz Markar; Philip H Pucher; Ismail A Badran; Long R Jiao; Ara Darzi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.