Literature DB >> 24952726

Transvaginal hybrid NOTES cholecystectomy--results of a randomized clinical trial after 6 months.

Dirk Rolf Bulian1, Jurgen Knuth, Nicola Cerasani, Jonas Lange, Michael Alfred Ströhlein, Axel Sauerwald, Markus Maria Heiss.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: For cholecystectomy (CHE), both the needlescopic three-trocar technique with 2-3-mm instruments (needlescopic cholecystectomy (NC)) and the umbilically assisted transvaginal technique with rigid instruments (transvaginal cholecystectomy (TVC)) have been established for further reduction of the trauma remaining from laparoscopy.
METHODS: To compare the further outcome of both techniques for elective CHE in female patients, we analyzed the secondary end points of a prospective randomized single-center trial (needlescopic versus transvaginal cholecystectomy (NATCH) trial; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT0168577), in particular, satisfaction with aesthetics, overall satisfaction, abdominal pain, and incidence of trocar hernias postoperatively at both 3 and 6 months. After 3 months, the domains "satisfaction" and "pain" of the German version of the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI-d) were additionally evaluated to detect respective complications. A gynecological control examination was conducted in all TVC patients after 6 months.
RESULTS: Forty patients were equally randomized into the therapy and the control groups between February 2010 and June 2012. No significant differences were found for overall satisfaction with the surgical result, abdominal pain, sexual function, and the rate of trocar hernias. However, aesthetics were rated significantly better by TVC patients both after 3 and after 6 months (P = 0.004 and P < 0.001). There were no postoperative pathological gynecological findings.
CONCLUSIONS: Following TVC, there is a significantly better aesthetic result as compared to NC, even at 3 and 6 months after the procedure. No difference was found for sexual function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24952726     DOI: 10.1007/s00423-014-1218-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg        ISSN: 1435-2443            Impact factor:   3.445


  29 in total

1.  The numeric rating scale for clinical pain measurement: a ratio measure?

Authors:  Craig T Hartrick; Juliann P Kovan; Sharon Shapiro
Journal:  Pain Pract       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.183

2.  Less pain after transvaginal/transumbilical cholecystectomy than after the classical laparoscopic technique: short-term results of a matched-cohort study.

Authors:  Dirk Rolf Bulian; Linda Trump; Jürgen Knuth; Robert Siegel; Axel Sauerwald; Michael A Ströhlein; Markus Maria Heiss
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  A prospective, randomized, single-blind trial of 5-mm versus 3-mm ports for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: is smaller better?

Authors:  M Bignell; M P N Lewis; E C K Cheong; M Rhodes
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Transvaginal-hybrid vs. single-port-access vs. 'conventional' laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Maik Kilian; Wieland Raue; Charalambos Menenakos; Brit Wassersleben; Jens Hartmann
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2011-03-08       Impact factor: 3.445

5.  Female population perception of conventional laparoscopy, transumbilical LESS, and transvaginal NOTES for cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Pascal Bucher; Sandrine Ostermann; François Pugin; Philippe Morel
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-02-08       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Long-term results of transvaginal/transumbilical versus classical laparoscopic cholecystectomy--an analysis of 88 patients.

Authors:  Dirk R Bulian; Linda Trump; Jürgen Knuth; Nicola Cerasani; Markus M Heiss
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 3.445

7.  Women's positive perception of transvaginal NOTES surgery.

Authors:  Carrie Y Peterson; Sonia Ramamoorthy; Barbara Andrews; Santiago Horgan; Mark Talamini; Alana Chock
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-12-05       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Randomized clinical trial of single-port, minilaparoscopic and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  S Saad; V Strassel; S Sauerland
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2012-11-27       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 9.  Miniports versus standard ports for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy; Jessica Vaughan; Rajarajan Ramamoorthy; Giuseppe Fusai; Brian R Davidson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-08-01

10.  Transvaginal/transumbilical hybrid--NOTES--versus 3-trocar needlescopic cholecystectomy: short-term results of a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Dirk Rolf Bulian; Jürgen Knuth; Nicola Cerasani; Axel Sauerwald; Rolf Lefering; Markus Maria Heiss
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  5 in total

1.  Systematic analysis of the safety and benefits of transvaginal hybrid-NOTES cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Dirk R Bulian; Jurgen Knuth; Kai S Lehmann; Axel Sauerwald; Markus M Heiss
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  [Implementation of hybrid-NOTES sigmoidectomy for diverticular disease : In a center for minimally invasive surgery].

Authors:  D C Steinemann; A Zerz; S H Lamm
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  Hybrid Transvaginal NOTES and Mini-Laparoscopic Colectomy: Benefit Through Synergy.

Authors:  Jayson M Moloney; Philip S L Gan
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2016 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

4.  Transvaginal Hybrid-NOTES procedures-do they have a negative impact on pregnancy and delivery?

Authors:  Panagiotis Thomaidis; Niklas J Weltermann; Claudia S Seefeldt; Dana C Richards; Axel Sauerwald; Markus M Heiss; Dirk R Bulian
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 3.445

5.  Suprapubic Cholecystectomy Improves Cosmetic Outcome Compared to Classic Cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Anas Taha; Stephanie Taha-Mehlitz; Ulrich Sternkopf; Elena Sorba; Bassey Enodien; Stephan Vorburger
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 4.964

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.