Literature DB >> 24464092

Assessment of intraosseous femoral head pressures during cement augmentation of the perforated proximal femur nail antirotation blade.

Michael Blankstein1, Daniel Widmer, Michael Götzen, Ladina Hofmann-Fliri, Robert G Richards, Boyko Gueorguiev, Markus Windolf.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The benefits of cement augmentation with fixation of osteoporotic pertrochanteric fractures have been previously demonstrated. The objective of this study was 3-fold: (1) To quantify the intraosseous pressure produced during cement augmentation of the perforated proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) blades; (2) To assess whether the pressure generated is influenced by the injection rate; and (3) To assess the amount of force applied during the injection.
METHODS: Six pairs of human cadaveric femurs were used in the study. A basicervical osteotomy was performed, and the heads were instrumented with the PFNA blade. Each pair was randomly assigned into 1 of 2 groups: slow versus rapid injection with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) cement. In the slow group, the augmentation was performed using 6 consecutive 1 mL injections, each over 10 seconds. In the rapid group, each 1 mL injection was performed over 5 seconds. For intraosseous pressure measurements, transmitters were inserted to a depth of 5 mm at both the superior and inferior apices of the head. The reaction forces on the syringe were measured as well.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the slow and rapid injection rates with respect to the peak pressures measured at the 6 time points immediately after cement injection. In both groups, elevations in pressure were transient and returned to baseline values within 30 seconds. The highest pressure recorded in the slow group was 37.3 and 30.7 mm Hg in the rapid group. The force required after each sequential injection increased in both groups; however, significantly higher forces were required to inject cement over 5 than 10 seconds (P = 0.036).
CONCLUSIONS: This in vitro model is the first one to demonstrate that femoral head cement augmentation is associated with a small transient increase in intraosseous pressure with sequential fast and slow 1 mL injections of up to 6 mL PMMA. We conclude that cement augmentation of the perforated PFNA blade carries a low risk of pressure-induced avascular necrosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24464092     DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000069

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0890-5339            Impact factor:   2.512


  9 in total

Review 1.  [Biomechanics of implant augmentation].

Authors:  M Windolf
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  Trochanteric fragility fractures : Treatment using the cement-augmented proximal femoral nail antirotation.

Authors:  C Neuerburg; S Mehaffey; M Gosch; W Böcker; M Blauth; C Kammerlander
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 1.154

3.  Cement augmentation of calcar screws may provide the greatest reduction in predicted screw cut-out risk for proximal humerus plating based on validated parametric computational modelling: Augmenting proximal humerus fracture plating.

Authors:  Peter Varga; Jason A Inzana; James W A Fletcher; Ladina Hofmann-Fliri; Armin Runer; Norbert P Südkamp; Markus Windolf
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 5.853

4.  Cement Augmentation in Sacroiliac Screw Fixation Offers Modest Biomechanical Advantages in a Cadaver Model.

Authors:  Georg Osterhoff; Andrew E Dodd; Florence Unno; Angus Wong; Shahram Amiri; Kelly A Lefaivre; Pierre Guy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Changes in bone density, intraosseous pressure of distal femoral articular cartilage and subchondral bone after proximal femoral medullary cavity cement filling in rabbits.

Authors:  Guo-Ping Le; Li-Cheng Xi; Ming Zhang; Jin-Min Zhao
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2021-06-06       Impact factor: 2.751

6.  Indications for cement augmentation in fixation of geriatric intertrochanteric femur fractures: a systematic review of evidence.

Authors:  L Henry Goodnough; Harsh Wadhwa; Seth S Tigchelaar; Malcolm R DeBaun; Michael J Chen; Matt L Graves; Michael J Gardner
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 2.928

7.  Does metaphyseal cement augmentation in fracture management influence the adjacent subchondral bone and joint cartilage?: an in vivo study in sheep stifle joints.

Authors:  Michael Goetzen; Ladina Hofmann-Fliri; Daniel Arens; Stephan Zeiter; Vincent Stadelmann; Dirk Nehrbass; R Geoff Richards; Michael Blauth
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.889

8.  Revision of a blade cut-out in PFN-A fixation: Blade exchange, cement augmentation and a cement plug as a successful salvage option.

Authors:  M S Hanke; N A Beckmann; M J B Keel; K A Siebenrock; J D Bastian
Journal:  Trauma Case Rep       Date:  2020-04-16

9.  Cement augmentation of the proximal femoral nail antirotation for the treatment of two intertrochanteric fractures - a comparative finite element study.

Authors:  Liqin Zheng; Xinmin Chen; Yongze Zheng; Xingpeng He; Jingxiong Wu; Ziling Lin
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 2.362

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.