PURPOSE: This study aims to compare the effects of a mandibular advancement device (MAD) with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) on blood pressure (BP), oxidative stress, and heart rate variability (HRV) in a randomized, crossed-over, single-blind, and controlled trial. METHODS:Twenty-nine moderate-to-severe adult OSA patients underwentMAD, CPAP, and placebo oral appliance treatment. Polysomnography, Epworth sleepiness scale, 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring, oxidative stress parameters (malondialdehyde, catalase, superoxide dismutase, vitamins C, E, B6, B12, folate, homocysteine, uric acid), and HRV were assessed at baseline and after 1 month of each treatment. Diaries were used to evaluate compliance for devices and a pressure-time meter for CPAP. RESULTS: Both active treatments resulted in decreases in apnea and hypopnea index and Epworth sleepiness scale; CPAP showed a greater effect. Frequency of diastolic BP dipping was higher in the MAD group compared with the CPAP group. A significant drop from baseline levels for catalase activity was observed after MAD. For HRV, there was a significant decrease in total power at night with CPAP and MAD compared with POA, and a decrease in index of sleep autonomic variation with MAD compared with baseline levels. Compliance rates were higher with MAD rather than CPAP. CONCLUSIONS: Even though CPAP proved to be more effective at attenuating OSA, better compliance with MAD favored the reduction of one of the enzymes which participates in oxidative stress and better autonomic modulation during sleep.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: This study aims to compare the effects of a mandibular advancement device (MAD) with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) on blood pressure (BP), oxidative stress, and heart rate variability (HRV) in a randomized, crossed-over, single-blind, and controlled trial. METHODS: Twenty-nine moderate-to-severe adult OSA patients underwent MAD, CPAP, and placebo oral appliance treatment. Polysomnography, Epworth sleepiness scale, 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring, oxidative stress parameters (malondialdehyde, catalase, superoxide dismutase, vitamins C, E, B6, B12, folate, homocysteine, uric acid), and HRV were assessed at baseline and after 1 month of each treatment. Diaries were used to evaluate compliance for devices and a pressure-time meter for CPAP. RESULTS: Both active treatments resulted in decreases in apnea and hypopnea index and Epworth sleepiness scale; CPAP showed a greater effect. Frequency of diastolic BP dipping was higher in the MAD group compared with the CPAP group. A significant drop from baseline levels for catalase activity was observed after MAD. For HRV, there was a significant decrease in total power at night with CPAP and MAD compared with POA, and a decrease in index of sleep autonomic variation with MAD compared with baseline levels. Compliance rates were higher with MAD rather than CPAP. CONCLUSIONS: Even though CPAP proved to be more effective at attenuating OSA, better compliance with MAD favored the reduction of one of the enzymes which participates in oxidative stress and better autonomic modulation during sleep.
Authors: Maree Barnes; R Douglas McEvoy; Siobhan Banks; Natalie Tarquinio; Christopher G Murray; Norman Vowles; Robert J Pierce Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2004-06-16 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Clete A Kushida; Michael R Littner; Max Hirshkowitz; Timothy I Morgenthaler; Cathy A Alessi; Dennis Bailey; Brian Boehlecke; Terry M Brown; Jack Coleman; Leah Friedman; Sheldon Kapen; Vishesh K Kapur; Milton Kramer; Teofilo Lee-Chiong; Judith Owens; Jeffrey P Pancer; Todd J Swick; Merrill S Wise Journal: Sleep Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Martin Glos; Thomas Penzel; Christoph Schoebel; Georg-Reiner Nitzsche; Sandra Zimmermann; Christopher Rudolph; Alexander Blau; Gert Baumann; Paul-Georg Jost-Brinkmann; Stefanie Rautengarten; Jan Christian Meier; Ingrid Peroz; Ingo Fietze Journal: Sleep Breath Date: 2015-10-13 Impact factor: 2.816