Literature DB >> 27397661

Effectiveness of Oral Appliances in Obstructive Sleep Apnea with Respiratory Arousals.

Pia Nerfeldt1, Danielle Friberg1.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVES: To compare adherence and treatment effects with an oral appliance (OA) in patients with different types of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA): those with mainly respiratory arousals ("arousers"), and those with oxygen desaturations ("desaturaters") at polysomnography (PSG).
METHODS: A prospective intervention study on 72 "tired snorers" with "normal" home sleep study (HSS), but later diagnosed as OSA with PSG, who accepted OA treatment. They were offered evaluation with a follow-up PSG and questionnaires, including the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), general health (GH), satisfaction, and side effects.
RESULTS: Sixty-six patients, 33 arousers and 33 desaturaters, were adapted to OA. The 1-year adherence rate was significantly higher among arousers (85%) than desaturaters (55%) (p = 0.034). Thirty-six of 66 patients underwent follow-up PSG; the apnea-hypopnea index was significantly reduced in 22 arousers from a median of 14 to 3 (p < 0.001), and in 14 desaturaters from 18 to 7 (p = 0.002; no significant group difference). ESS and GH showed no significant improvements in either group, although sleepy "arousers" (ESS ≥ 10) significantly improved their ESS. In total, 77% reported side effects, while 63% were still satisfied with the OA treatment. Gender analysis showed a significant dominance of females classified as "arousers" (p = 0.025).
CONCLUSIONS: OSA patients with mainly arousals at PSG showed higher adherence to OA treatment, compared to patients with desaturations. Both groups responded similarly to treatment: improved nocturnal respiration, but only a small reduction of symptoms. We suggest that "tired snorers" with "normal HSS" should be offered PSG, and if OSA, also OA treatment.
© 2016 American Academy of Sleep Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  apnea; dental device; obstructive sleep apnea; oral appliance; sleep; upper airway resistance syndrome

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27397661      PMCID: PMC4957194          DOI: 10.5664/jcsm.6058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med        ISSN: 1550-9389            Impact factor:   4.062


  27 in total

Review 1.  Sleep-related breathing disorders in adults: recommendations for syndrome definition and measurement techniques in clinical research. The Report of an American Academy of Sleep Medicine Task Force.

Authors: 
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  1999-08-01       Impact factor: 5.849

Review 2.  The upper airway resistance syndrome.

Authors:  J L Pépin; M Guillot; R Tamisier; P Lévy
Journal:  Respiration       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 3.580

3.  A randomized crossover study of an oral appliance vs nasal-continuous positive airway pressure in the treatment of mild-moderate obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  K A Ferguson; T Ono; A A Lowe; S P Keenan; J A Fleetham
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 9.410

4.  Practice parameters for the treatment of snoring and obstructive sleep apnea with oral appliances. American Sleep Disorders Association.

Authors: 
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 5.849

Review 5.  Assessment of predictive ability of Epworth scoring in screening of patients with sleep apnoea.

Authors:  A Sil; G Barr
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 1.469

6.  Mandibular advancement device and CPAP upon cardiovascular parameters in OSA.

Authors:  Cibele Dal-Fabbro; Silvério Garbuio; Vânia D'Almeida; Fátima D Cintra; Sergio Tufik; Lia Bittencourt
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2014-01-26       Impact factor: 2.816

7.  The occurrence of sleep-disordered breathing among middle-aged adults.

Authors:  T Young; M Palta; J Dempsey; J Skatrud; S Weber; S Badr
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-04-29       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  A new method for measuring daytime sleepiness: the Epworth sleepiness scale.

Authors:  M W Johns
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 5.849

9.  A comparison between the AASM 2012 and 2007 definitions for detecting hypopnea.

Authors:  Ahmed S BaHammam; Amr Obeidat; Kashmira Barataman; Salman A Bahammam; Awad H Olaish; Munir M Sharif
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 2.816

Review 10.  Review of oral appliances for treatment of sleep-disordered breathing.

Authors:  Victor Hoffstein
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.816

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  [Hypoglossal nerve stimulation in patients with CPAP failure : Evolution of an alternative treatment for patients with obstructive sleep apnea].

Authors:  C Heiser; B Hofauer
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Factors influencing adherence to oral appliance therapy in adults with obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Harishri Tallamraju; J Tim Newton; Padhraig S Fleming; Ama Johal
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 4.324

Review 3.  Update on Oral Appliance Therapy for OSA.

Authors:  M Marklund
Journal:  Curr Sleep Med Rep       Date:  2017-07-10
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.