Literature DB >> 24463593

Willingness to participate in accountable care organizations: health care managers' perspective.

Thomas T H Wan1, Maysoun Demachkie Masri, Judith Ortiz, Blossom Y J Lin.   

Abstract

This study examines how health care managers responded to the accountable care organization (ACO). The effect of perceived benefits and barriers of the commitment to develop a strategic plan for ACOs and willingness to participate in ACOs is analyzed, using organizational social capital, health information technology uses, health systems integration and size of the health networks, geographic factors, and knowledge about ACOs as predictors. Propensity score matching and analysis are used to adjust the state and regional variations. When the number of perceived benefits is greater than the number of perceived barriers, health care managers are more likely to reveal a stronger commitment to develop a strategic plan for ACO adoption. Health care managers who perceived their organizations as lacking leadership support or commitment, financial incentives, and legal and regulatory support to ACO adoption were less willing to participate in ACOs in the future. Future research should gather more diverse views from a larger sample size of health professionals regarding ACO participation. The perspective of health care managers should be seriously considered in the adoption of an innovative health care delivery system. The transparency on policy formulation should consider multiple views of health care managers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24463593      PMCID: PMC4050369          DOI: 10.1097/01.HCM.0000440625.92879.e8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Care Manag (Frederick)        ISSN: 1525-5794


  11 in total

1.  Propensity score methods in drug safety studies: practice, strengths and limitations.

Authors:  J Wang; P T Donnan
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2001 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 2.890

2.  Medicare program; Medicare Shared Savings Program: Accountable Care Organizations. Final rule.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fed Regist       Date:  2011-11-02

3.  A national strategy to put accountable care into practice.

Authors:  Mark McClellan; Aaron N McKethan; Julie L Lewis; Joachim Roski; Elliott S Fisher
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 6.301

4.  A comparison of propensity score methods: a case-study estimating the effectiveness of post-AMI statin use.

Authors:  Peter C Austin; Muhammad M Mamdani
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2006-06-30       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  The Affordable Care Act: the ethical call for value-based leadership to transform quality.

Authors:  Llewellyn E Piper
Journal:  Health Care Manag (Frederick)       Date:  2013 Jul-Sep

6.  Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group.

Authors:  R B D'Agostino
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1998-10-15       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Launching accountable care organizations--the proposed rule for the Medicare Shared Savings Program.

Authors:  Donald M Berwick
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Hospitals on the path to accountable care: highlights from a 2011 national survey of hospital readiness to participate in an accountable care organization.

Authors:  Anne-Marie J Audet; Kevin Kenward; Shreya Patel; Maulik S Joshi
Journal:  Issue Brief (Commonw Fund)       Date:  2012-08

9.  The potential of Medicare accountable care organizations to transform the American health care marketplace: rhetoric and reality.

Authors:  David J Ballard
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 7.616

10.  Effects of health guidance on outpatient and pharmacy expenditures: a disease- and drug-specific 3-year observational study using propensity-score matching.

Authors:  Etsuji Okamoto
Journal:  J Epidemiol       Date:  2013-06-01       Impact factor: 3.211

View more
  5 in total

1.  Cost of Practice Transformation in Primary Care: Joining an Accountable Care Organization.

Authors:  Richard Hofler; Judith Ortiz; Brian Coté
Journal:  J Health Care Finance       Date:  2018

2.  Does Patient-Centered Medical Home Recognition Relate to Accountable Care Organization Participation?

Authors:  Yi-Ling Lin; Yuan Du; Cristina Gomez; Judith Ortiz
Journal:  Popul Health Manag       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 2.459

3.  Longitudinal participation in delivery and payment reform programs among US Primary Care Organizations.

Authors:  Julia Adler-Milstein; Ariel Linden; Steven Bernstein; John Hollingsworth; Andrew Ryan
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-02-28       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Facilitators and barriers to implementing electronic referral and/or consultation systems: a qualitative study of 16 health organizations.

Authors:  Delphine S Tuot; Kiren Leeds; Elizabeth J Murphy; Urmimala Sarkar; Courtney R Lyles; Tekeshe Mekonnen; Alice H M Chen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-12-19       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 5.  Health Information Technology and Accountable Care Organizations: A Systematic Review and Future Directions.

Authors:  Casey P Balio; Nate C Apathy; Robin L Danek
Journal:  EGEMS (Wash DC)       Date:  2019-07-08
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.