Literature DB >> 24463215

Complex or monosomal karyotype and not blast percentage is associated with poor survival in acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome patients with inv(3)(q21q26.2)/t(3;3)(q21;q26.2): a Bone Marrow Pathology Group study.

Heesun J Rogers1, James W Vardiman, John Anastasi, Gordana Raca, Natasha M Savage, Athena M Cherry, Daniel Arber, Erika Moore, Jennifer J D Morrissette, Adam Bagg, Yen-Chun Liu, Susan Mathew, Attilio Orazi, Pei Lin, Sa A Wang, Carlos E Bueso-Ramos, Kathryn Foucar, Robert P Hasserjian, Ramon V Tiu, Matthew Karafa, Eric D Hsi.   

Abstract

Acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome with inv(3)(q21q26.2)/t(3;3)(q21;q26.2) have a poor prognosis. Indeed, the inv(3)(q21q26.2)/t(3;3)(q21;q26.2) has been recognized as a poor risk karyotype in the revised International Prognostic Scoring System. However, inv(3)(q21q26.2)/t(3;3)(q21;q26.2) is not among the cytogenetic abnormalities pathognomonic for diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia irrespective of blast percentage in the 2008 WHO classification. This multicenter study evaluated the clinico-pathological features of acute myeloid leukemia/myelodysplastic syndrome patients with inv(3)(q21q26.2)/t(3;3)(q21;q26.2) and applied the revised International Prognostic Scoring System to myelodysplastic syndrome patients with inv(3)(q21q26.2)/t(3;3)(q21;q26.2). A total of 103 inv(3)(q21q26.2)/t(3;3)(q21;q26.2) patients were reviewed and had a median bone marrow blast count of 4% in myelodysplastic syndrome (n=40) and 52% in acute myeloid leukemia (n=63) (P<0.001). Ninety-one percent of patients showed characteristic dysmegakaryopoiesis. There was no difference in overall survival between acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome patients with inv(3)(q21q26.2)/t(3;3)(q21;q26.2) (12.9 vs. 7.9 months; P=0.16). Eighty-three percent of patients died (median follow up 7.9 months). Complex karyotype, monosomal karyotype and dysgranulopoiesis (but not blast percentage) were independent poor prognostic factors in the entire cohort on multivariable analysis. The revised International Prognostic Scoring System better reflected overall survival of inv(3)(q21q26.2)/t(3;3)(q21;q26.2) than the International Prognostic Scoring System but did not fully reflect the generally dismal prognosis. Our data support consideration of myelodysplastic syndrome with inv(3)(q21q26.2)/t(3;3)(q21;q26.2) as an acute myeloid leukemia with recurrent genetic abnormalities, irrespective of blast percentage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24463215      PMCID: PMC4008101          DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2013.096420

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Haematologica        ISSN: 0390-6078            Impact factor:   9.941


  36 in total

1.  The Evi1 proto-oncoprotein blocks endomitosis in megakaryocytes by inhibiting sustained cyclin-dependent kinase 2 catalytic activity.

Authors:  Anna Kilbey; Hadi Alzuherri; Joan McColl; Carmela Calés; Jonathan Frampton; Christopher Bartholomew
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 6.998

2.  EVI1 is consistently expressed as principal transcript in common and rare recurrent 3q26 rearrangements.

Authors:  Bruce Poppe; Nicole Dastugue; Jo Vandesompele; Barbara Cauwelier; Betty De Smet; Nurten Yigit; Anne De Paepe; Jose Cervera; Christian Recher; Véronique De Mas; Anne Hagemeijer; Frank Speleman
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 5.006

3.  Chromosomal abnormality inv(3)(q21q26) associated with multilineage hematopoietic progenitor cells in hematopoietic malignancies.

Authors:  G Shi; H J Weh; U Dührsen; W Zeller; D K Hossfeld
Journal:  Cancer Genet Cytogenet       Date:  1997-07-01

4.  3q21 and 3q26 cytogenetic abnormalities in acute myeloblastic leukemia: biological and clinical features.

Authors:  N Testoni; G Borsaru; G Martinelli; C Carboni; D Ruggeri; E Ottaviani; S Pelliconi; P Ricci; R Pastano; G Visani; A Zaccaria; S Tura
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 9.941

5.  International scoring system for evaluating prognosis in myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  P Greenberg; C Cox; M M LeBeau; P Fenaux; P Morel; G Sanz; M Sanz; T Vallespi; T Hamblin; D Oscier; K Ohyashiki; K Toyama; C Aul; G Mufti; J Bennett
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1997-03-15       Impact factor: 22.113

6.  Late appearance of a Philadelphia chromosome in a patient with therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia and high expression of EVI1.

Authors:  Shigeki Yagyu; Akira Morimoto; Naoki Kakazu; Shinichi Tamura; Atsushi Fujiki; Yoko Nakase; Tomoko Iehara; Hajime Hosoi; Hiroshi Kuroda
Journal:  Cancer Genet Cytogenet       Date:  2008-01-15

7.  Advanced age and high initial WBC influence the outcome of inv(3) (q21q26)/t(3;3) (q21;q26) positive AML.

Authors:  Martin Weisser; Claudia Haferlach; Torsten Haferlach; Susanne Schnittger
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2007-11

8.  Genomic instability and myelodysplasia with monosomy 7 consequent to EVI1 activation after gene therapy for chronic granulomatous disease.

Authors:  Stefan Stein; Marion G Ott; Stephan Schultze-Strasser; Anna Jauch; Barbara Burwinkel; Andrea Kinner; Manfred Schmidt; Alwin Krämer; Joachim Schwäble; Hanno Glimm; Ulrike Koehl; Carolin Preiss; Claudia Ball; Hans Martin; Gudrun Göhring; Kerstin Schwarzwaelder; Wolf-Karsten Hofmann; Kadin Karakaya; Sandrine Tchatchou; Rongxi Yang; Petra Reinecke; Klaus Kühlcke; Brigitte Schlegelberger; Adrian J Thrasher; Dieter Hoelzer; Reinhard Seger; Christof von Kalle; Manuel Grez
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2010-01-24       Impact factor: 53.440

9.  Significant increase of self-renewal in hematopoietic cells after forced expression of EVI1.

Authors:  Leopoldo Laricchia-Robbio; Giuseppina Nucifora
Journal:  Blood Cells Mol Dis       Date:  2007-10-29       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 10.  The oncogene and developmental regulator EVI1: expression, biochemical properties, and biological functions.

Authors:  Rotraud Wieser
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2007-04-20       Impact factor: 3.688

View more
  13 in total

1.  The closely related rare and severe acute myeloid leukemias carrying EVI1 or PRDM16 rearrangements share singular biological features.

Authors:  Marion Eveillard; Jacques Delaunay; Steven Richebourg; Laurence Lodé; Richard Garand; Soraya Wuillème; François Duhoux; Hélène Antoine-Poirel; Catherine Godon; Marie C Béné
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 2.  Genetic and epigenetic heterogeneity and the impact on cancer relapse.

Authors:  Ciaran Hassan; Ebrahim Afshinnekoo; Sheng Li; Shixiu Wu; Christopher E Mason
Journal:  Exp Hematol       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 3.084

3.  3q26.2/EVI1 rearrangement is associated with poor prognosis in classical Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms.

Authors:  Zhihong Hu; L Jeffrey Medeiros; Wei Wang; Zi Chen; Guilin Tang; Parsa Hodjat; Su Yang; Lianghua Fang; Yan Li; Srdan Verstovsek; Shimin Hu
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 7.842

4.  EVI1-rearranged acute myeloid leukemias are characterized by distinct molecular alterations.

Authors:  Vincent-Philippe Lavallée; Patrick Gendron; Sébastien Lemieux; Giovanni D'Angelo; Josée Hébert; Guy Sauvageau
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 5.  The International Consensus Classification of acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Olga K Weinberg; Anna Porwit; Attilio Orazi; Robert P Hasserjian; Kathryn Foucar; Eric J Duncavage; Daniel A Arber
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2022-10-20       Impact factor: 4.535

6.  Clinical and prognostic significance of 3q26.2 and other chromosome 3 abnormalities in CML in the era of tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

Authors:  Wei Wang; Jorge E Cortes; Pei Lin; Michael W Beaty; Di Ai; Hesham M Amin; Timothy J McDonnell; Chi Young Ok; Hagop M Kantarjian; L Jeffrey Medeiros; Shimin Hu
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 7.  Prognostic mutation constellations in acute myeloid leukaemia and myelodysplastic syndrome.

Authors:  Ilaria Iacobucci; Charles G Mullighan
Journal:  Curr Opin Hematol       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 3.284

Review 8.  EVI1 dysregulation: impact on biology and therapy of myeloid malignancies.

Authors:  Christine Birdwell; Warren Fiskus; Tapan M Kadia; Courtney D DiNardo; Christopher P Mill; Kapil N Bhalla
Journal:  Blood Cancer J       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 11.037

Review 9.  Is Myelodysplasia a Consequence of Normal Aging?

Authors:  Sonja Heibl; Reinhard Stauder; Michael Pfeilstöcker
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2021-11-04       Impact factor: 5.075

10.  EVI1 and GATA2 misexpression induced by inv(3)(q21q26) contribute to megakaryocyte-lineage skewing and leukemogenesis.

Authors:  Ayaka Yamaoka; Mikiko Suzuki; Saori Katayama; Daiki Orihara; James Douglas Engel; Masayuki Yamamoto
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2020-04-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.