Literature DB >> 33427759

Prognostic mutation constellations in acute myeloid leukaemia and myelodysplastic syndrome.

Ilaria Iacobucci1, Charles G Mullighan1,2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In the past decade, numerous studies analysing the genome and transcriptome of large cohorts of acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) patients have substantially improved our knowledge of the genetic landscape of these diseases with the identification of heterogeneous constellations of germline and somatic mutations with prognostic and therapeutic relevance. However, inclusion of integrated genetic data into classification schema is still far from a reality. The purpose of this review is to summarize recent insights into the prevalence, pathogenic role, clonal architecture, prognostic impact and therapeutic management of genetic alterations across the spectrum of myeloid malignancies. RECENT
FINDINGS: Recent multiomic-studies, including analysis of genetic alterations at the single-cell resolution, have revealed a high heterogeneity of lesions in over 200 recurrently mutated genes affecting disease initiation, clonal evolution and clinical outcome. Artificial intelligence and specifically machine learning approaches have been applied to large cohorts of AML and MDS patients to define in an unbiased manner clinically meaningful disease patterns including, disease classification, prognostication and therapeutic vulnerability, paving the way for future use in clinical practice.
SUMMARY: Integration of genomic, transcriptomic, epigenomic and clinical data coupled to conventional and machine learning approaches will allow refined leukaemia classification and risk prognostication and will identify novel therapeutic targets for these still high-risk leukaemia subtypes.
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33427759      PMCID: PMC8174569          DOI: 10.1097/MOH.0000000000000629

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Hematol        ISSN: 1065-6251            Impact factor:   3.284


  87 in total

Review 1.  Myelodysplastic Syndromes.

Authors:  Mario Cazzola
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Revisiting erythroleukemia.

Authors:  Daniel A Arber
Journal:  Curr Opin Hematol       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.284

Review 3.  The genetics of myelodysplastic syndrome: from clonal haematopoiesis to secondary leukaemia.

Authors:  Adam S Sperling; Christopher J Gibson; Benjamin L Ebert
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 60.716

4.  Prognostic relevance of integrated genetic profiling in acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Jay P Patel; Mithat Gönen; Maria E Figueroa; Hugo Fernandez; Zhuoxin Sun; Janis Racevskis; Pieter Van Vlierberghe; Igor Dolgalev; Sabrena Thomas; Olga Aminova; Kety Huberman; Janice Cheng; Agnes Viale; Nicholas D Socci; Adriana Heguy; Athena Cherry; Gail Vance; Rodney R Higgins; Rhett P Ketterling; Robert E Gallagher; Mark Litzow; Marcel R M van den Brink; Hillard M Lazarus; Jacob M Rowe; Selina Luger; Adolfo Ferrando; Elisabeth Paietta; Martin S Tallman; Ari Melnick; Omar Abdel-Wahab; Ross L Levine
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  NUP98 is rearranged in 3.8% of pediatric AML forming a clinical and molecular homogenous group with a poor prognosis.

Authors:  S Struski; S Lagarde; P Bories; C Puiseux; N Prade; W Cuccuini; M-P Pages; A Bidet; C Gervais; M Lafage-Pochitaloff; C Roche-Lestienne; C Barin; D Penther; N Nadal; I Radford-Weiss; M-A Collonge-Rame; B Gaillard; F Mugneret; C Lefebvre; E Bart-Delabesse; A Petit; G Leverger; C Broccardo; I Luquet; M Pasquet; E Delabesse
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 11.528

6.  A prognostic score for patients with lower risk myelodysplastic syndrome.

Authors:  G Garcia-Manero; J Shan; S Faderl; J Cortes; F Ravandi; G Borthakur; W G Wierda; S Pierce; E Estey; J Liu; X Huang; H Kantarjian
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2007-12-13       Impact factor: 11.528

7.  Mutation in TET2 in myeloid cancers.

Authors:  François Delhommeau; Sabrina Dupont; Véronique Della Valle; Chloé James; Severine Trannoy; Aline Massé; Olivier Kosmider; Jean-Pierre Le Couedic; Fabienne Robert; Antonio Alberdi; Yann Lécluse; Isabelle Plo; François J Dreyfus; Christophe Marzac; Nicole Casadevall; Catherine Lacombe; Serge P Romana; Philippe Dessen; Jean Soulier; Franck Viguié; Michaela Fontenay; William Vainchenker; Olivier A Bernard
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-05-28       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 8.  The genetic basis of myelodysplasia and its clinical relevance.

Authors:  Mario Cazzola; Matteo G Della Porta; Luca Malcovati
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 9.  MLL-Rearranged Leukemias-An Update on Science and Clinical Approaches.

Authors:  Amanda C Winters; Kathrin M Bernt
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 3.418

10.  Machine learning demonstrates that somatic mutations imprint invariant morphologic features in myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  Yasunobu Nagata; Ran Zhao; Hassan Awada; Cassandra M Kerr; Inom Mirzaev; Sunisa Kongkiatkamon; Aziz Nazha; Hideki Makishima; Tomas Radivoyevitch; Jacob G Scott; Mikkael A Sekeres; Brian P Hobbs; Jaroslaw P Maciejewski
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 25.476

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.