Ilaria Iacobucci1, Charles G Mullighan1,2. 1. Department of Pathology. 2. Hematological Malignancies Program, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In the past decade, numerous studies analysing the genome and transcriptome of large cohorts of acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) patients have substantially improved our knowledge of the genetic landscape of these diseases with the identification of heterogeneous constellations of germline and somatic mutations with prognostic and therapeutic relevance. However, inclusion of integrated genetic data into classification schema is still far from a reality. The purpose of this review is to summarize recent insights into the prevalence, pathogenic role, clonal architecture, prognostic impact and therapeutic management of genetic alterations across the spectrum of myeloid malignancies. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent multiomic-studies, including analysis of genetic alterations at the single-cell resolution, have revealed a high heterogeneity of lesions in over 200 recurrently mutated genes affecting disease initiation, clonal evolution and clinical outcome. Artificial intelligence and specifically machine learning approaches have been applied to large cohorts of AML and MDS patients to define in an unbiased manner clinically meaningful disease patterns including, disease classification, prognostication and therapeutic vulnerability, paving the way for future use in clinical practice. SUMMARY: Integration of genomic, transcriptomic, epigenomic and clinical data coupled to conventional and machine learning approaches will allow refined leukaemia classification and risk prognostication and will identify novel therapeutic targets for these still high-risk leukaemia subtypes.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In the past decade, numerous studies analysing the genome and transcriptome of large cohorts of acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) patients have substantially improved our knowledge of the genetic landscape of these diseases with the identification of heterogeneous constellations of germline and somatic mutations with prognostic and therapeutic relevance. However, inclusion of integrated genetic data into classification schema is still far from a reality. The purpose of this review is to summarize recent insights into the prevalence, pathogenic role, clonal architecture, prognostic impact and therapeutic management of genetic alterations across the spectrum of myeloid malignancies. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent multiomic-studies, including analysis of genetic alterations at the single-cell resolution, have revealed a high heterogeneity of lesions in over 200 recurrently mutated genes affecting disease initiation, clonal evolution and clinical outcome. Artificial intelligence and specifically machine learning approaches have been applied to large cohorts of AML and MDS patients to define in an unbiased manner clinically meaningful disease patterns including, disease classification, prognostication and therapeutic vulnerability, paving the way for future use in clinical practice. SUMMARY: Integration of genomic, transcriptomic, epigenomic and clinical data coupled to conventional and machine learning approaches will allow refined leukaemia classification and risk prognostication and will identify novel therapeutic targets for these still high-risk leukaemia subtypes.
Authors: Jay P Patel; Mithat Gönen; Maria E Figueroa; Hugo Fernandez; Zhuoxin Sun; Janis Racevskis; Pieter Van Vlierberghe; Igor Dolgalev; Sabrena Thomas; Olga Aminova; Kety Huberman; Janice Cheng; Agnes Viale; Nicholas D Socci; Adriana Heguy; Athena Cherry; Gail Vance; Rodney R Higgins; Rhett P Ketterling; Robert E Gallagher; Mark Litzow; Marcel R M van den Brink; Hillard M Lazarus; Jacob M Rowe; Selina Luger; Adolfo Ferrando; Elisabeth Paietta; Martin S Tallman; Ari Melnick; Omar Abdel-Wahab; Ross L Levine Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-03-14 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: S Struski; S Lagarde; P Bories; C Puiseux; N Prade; W Cuccuini; M-P Pages; A Bidet; C Gervais; M Lafage-Pochitaloff; C Roche-Lestienne; C Barin; D Penther; N Nadal; I Radford-Weiss; M-A Collonge-Rame; B Gaillard; F Mugneret; C Lefebvre; E Bart-Delabesse; A Petit; G Leverger; C Broccardo; I Luquet; M Pasquet; E Delabesse Journal: Leukemia Date: 2016-10-03 Impact factor: 11.528
Authors: G Garcia-Manero; J Shan; S Faderl; J Cortes; F Ravandi; G Borthakur; W G Wierda; S Pierce; E Estey; J Liu; X Huang; H Kantarjian Journal: Leukemia Date: 2007-12-13 Impact factor: 11.528
Authors: François Delhommeau; Sabrina Dupont; Véronique Della Valle; Chloé James; Severine Trannoy; Aline Massé; Olivier Kosmider; Jean-Pierre Le Couedic; Fabienne Robert; Antonio Alberdi; Yann Lécluse; Isabelle Plo; François J Dreyfus; Christophe Marzac; Nicole Casadevall; Catherine Lacombe; Serge P Romana; Philippe Dessen; Jean Soulier; Franck Viguié; Michaela Fontenay; William Vainchenker; Olivier A Bernard Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2009-05-28 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Yasunobu Nagata; Ran Zhao; Hassan Awada; Cassandra M Kerr; Inom Mirzaev; Sunisa Kongkiatkamon; Aziz Nazha; Hideki Makishima; Tomas Radivoyevitch; Jacob G Scott; Mikkael A Sekeres; Brian P Hobbs; Jaroslaw P Maciejewski Journal: Blood Date: 2020-11-12 Impact factor: 25.476