Literature DB >> 12670671

Pain rating by patients and physicians: evidence of systematic pain miscalibration.

Laetitia Marquié1, Eric Raufaste, Dominique Lauque, Claudette Mariné, Marie Ecoiffier, Paul Sorum.   

Abstract

This study is an investigation of the existence and potential causes of systematic differences between patients and physicians in their assessments of the intensity of patients' pain. In an emergency department in France, patients (N=200) and their physicians (N=48) rated the patients' pain using a visual analog scale, both on arrival and at discharge. Results showed, in confirmation of previous studies, that physicians gave significantly lower ratings than did patients of the patients' pain both on arrival (mean difference -1.33, standard error (SE)=0.17, on a scale of 0-10, P<0.001) and at exit (-1.38, SE=0.15, P<0.001). The extent of 'miscalibration' was greater with expert than novice physicians and depended on interactions among physician gender, patient gender, and the obviousness of the cause of pain. Thus physicians' pain ratings may have been affected by non-medical factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12670671     DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3959(02)00402-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  39 in total

1.  [Perioperative pain therapy in orthopedics].

Authors:  T Fikentscher; J Grifka; A Benditz
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  [Acute pain therapy in orthopedics/trauma surgery].

Authors:  S Rehart; M Henniger; M Arndt
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Pain and anxiety during bone marrow aspiration/biopsy: Comparison of ratings among patients versus health-care professionals.

Authors:  Y Lidén; N Olofsson; O Landgren; E Johansson
Journal:  Eur J Oncol Nurs       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 2.398

4.  Patient Prioritization Preferences among Physiotherapy Entry-Level Students: The Importance of Chronic Pain.

Authors:  Maude Laliberté; Debbie Ehrmann Feldman
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.037

5.  Opioid Prescriptions for Acute and Chronic Pain Management Among Medicaid Beneficiaries.

Authors:  Chandrashekar Janakiram; Paul Fontelo; Vojtech Huser; Natalia I Chalmers; Gabriela Lopez Mitnik; Avery R Brow; Timothy J Iafolla; Bruce A Dye
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 5.043

6.  Fatigue, insomnia and nervousness: gender disparities and roles of individual characteristics and lifestyle factors among economically active people.

Authors:  Patrick Peretti-Watel; Stéphane Legleye; Michèle Baumann; Marie Choquet; Bruno Falissard; Nearkasen Chau
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 4.328

7.  Racial bias in pain perception and response: experimental examination of automatic and deliberate processes.

Authors:  Vani A Mathur; Jennifer A Richeson; Judith A Paice; Michael Muzyka; Joan Y Chiao
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 5.820

8.  Patient-physician disagreement regarding performance status is associated with worse survivorship in patients with advanced cancer.

Authors:  Ian D Schnadig; Erik K Fromme; Charles L Loprinzi; Jeff A Sloan; Motomi Mori; Hong Li; Tomasz M Beer
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Studying sex and gender differences in pain and analgesia: a consensus report.

Authors:  Joel D Greenspan; Rebecca M Craft; Linda LeResche; Lars Arendt-Nielsen; Karen J Berkley; Roger B Fillingim; Michael S Gold; Anita Holdcroft; Stefan Lautenbacher; Emeran A Mayer; Jeffrey S Mogil; Anne Z Murphy; Richard J Traub
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2007-10-25       Impact factor: 6.961

Review 10.  Paramedic assessment of pain in the cognitively impaired adult patient.

Authors:  Bill Lord
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2009-10-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.