Literature DB >> 24462751

The Spatial Orienting paradigm: how to design and interpret spatial attention experiments.

Ana B Chica1, Elisa Martín-Arévalo2, Fabiano Botta2, Juan Lupiáñez2.   

Abstract

This paper is conceived as a guide that will describe the very well known Spatial Orienting paradigm, used to explore attentional processes in healthy individuals as well as in people suffering from psychiatric disorders and brain-damaged patients. The paradigm was developed in the late 1970s, and since then, it has been used in thousands of attentional studies. In this review, we attempt to describe, the paradigm for the naïf reader, and explain in detail when is it used, which variables are usually manipulated, how to interpret its results, and how can it be adapted to different populations and methodologies. The main goal of this review is to provide a practical guide to researchers who have never used the paradigm that will help them design their experiments, as a function of their theoretical and experimental needs. We also focus on how to adapt the paradigm to different technologies (such as event-related potentials, functional resonance imaging, or transcranial magnetic stimulation), and to different populations by presenting an example of its use in brain-damaged patients.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attention; Facilitation; Inhibition of Return; Spatial orienting; Validity

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24462751     DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.01.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev        ISSN: 0149-7634            Impact factor:   8.989


  40 in total

1.  Exogenous and endogenous shifts of attention in perihand space.

Authors:  Nathalie Le Bigot; Marc Grosjean
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-07-02

2.  Target bottom-up strength determines the extent of attentional modulations on conscious perception.

Authors:  Fabiano Botta; Estrella Ródenas; Ana B Chica
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Multiple cueing dissociates location- and feature-based repetition effects.

Authors:  Kesong Hu; Junya Zhan; Bingzhao Li; Shuchang He; Arthur G Samuel
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  The misrepresentation of spatial uncertainty in visual search: Single- versus joint-distribution probability cues.

Authors:  Bradley S Gibson; Joseph R Pauszek; Jamie M Trost; Michael J Wenger
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Sensory adaptation and inhibition of return: dissociating multiple inhibitory cueing effects.

Authors:  Alfred Lim; Vivian Eng; Steve M J Janssen; Jason Satel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Attentional influences on memory formation: A tale of a not-so-simple story.

Authors:  J Ortiz-Tudela; B Milliken; L Jiménez; J Lupiáñez
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-05

7.  Out with the new, in with the old: Exogenous orienting to locations with physically constant stimulation.

Authors:  J Eric T Taylor; Matthew D Hilchey; Jay Pratt
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-08

8.  Emotion first: children prioritize emotional faces in gaze-cued attentional orienting.

Authors:  Anna Pecchinenda; Manuel Petrucci
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2019-08-08

9.  The appeal of the devil's eye: social evaluation affects social attention.

Authors:  Luciana Carraro; Mario Dalmaso; Luigi Castelli; Giovanni Galfano; Andrea Bobbio; Gabriele Mantovani
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2016-11-11

10.  Assessing attention orienting in mice: a novel touchscreen adaptation of the Posner-style cueing task.

Authors:  S Li; C May; A J Hannan; K A Johnson; E L Burrows
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2020-10-02       Impact factor: 7.853

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.