Literature DB >> 26134543

Exogenous and endogenous shifts of attention in perihand space.

Nathalie Le Bigot1, Marc Grosjean2.   

Abstract

While some studies have found that attentional orienting is altered in perihand space, most have not. One reason for such discrepancies may be related to the types of cues (uninformative and informative) that have been used, as they are known to induce different types of shifts of attention (exogenous and endogenous, respectively). To systematically address this question, two experiments were performed in which an uninformative peripheral cue (Experiment 1) or an informative central cue (Experiment 2) preceded a peripheral target with a short (100-150 ms) stimulus-onset asynchrony. Participants performed the task with their left hand, right hand, both hands, or no hands near the display. Cueing effects were obtained in both experiments, but they were only modulated by hand position in Experiment 1, with larger effects observed in the right- and both-hand conditions. These findings suggest that exogenous attention shifts are affected by hand proximity, while endogenous shifts are not.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26134543     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-015-0680-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  30 in total

1.  Comparing intramodal and crossmodal cuing in the endogenous orienting of spatial attention.

Authors:  Ana B Chica; Daniel Sanabria; Juan Lupiáñez; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-12-08       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Body position differentially influences responses to exogenous and endogenous cues.

Authors:  Jim McAuliffe; Michel J Johnson; Bruce Weaver; Miranda Deller-Quinn; Steve Hansen
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Grab it! Biased attention in functional hand and tool space.

Authors:  Catherine L Reed; Ryan Betz; John P Garza; Ralph J Roberts
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 4.  Two cognitive and neural systems for endogenous and exogenous spatial attention.

Authors:  Ana B Chica; Paolo Bartolomeo; Juan Lupiáñez
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Reduced temporal fusion in near-hand space.

Authors:  Stephanie C Goodhew; Davood G Gozli; Susanne Ferber; Jay Pratt
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-04-18

6.  Interhemispheric effects on reaction time to verbal and nonverbal visual stimuli.

Authors:  G Geffen; J L Bradshaw; G Wallace
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1971-03

7.  Orienting of attention.

Authors:  M I Posner
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 2.143

8.  Improved change detection with nearby hands.

Authors:  Philip Tseng; Bruce Bridgeman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-01-30       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Prolonged disengagement from distractors near the hands.

Authors:  Daniel B Vatterott; Shaun P Vecera
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-08-15

10.  Hand proximity facilitates spatial discrimination of auditory tones.

Authors:  Philip Tseng; Jiaxin Yu; Ovid J L Tzeng; Daisy L Hung; Chi-Hung Juan
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-06-11
View more
  2 in total

1.  Eye-hand coordination during visuomotor adaptation: effects of hemispace and joint coordination.

Authors:  Miya K Rand; Sebastian Rentsch
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Effects of Hand Proximity and Movement Direction in Spatial and Temporal Gap Discrimination.

Authors:  Michael Wiemers; Martin H Fischer
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-12-09
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.