Literature DB >> 27837290

The appeal of the devil's eye: social evaluation affects social attention.

Luciana Carraro1, Mario Dalmaso2, Luigi Castelli1, Giovanni Galfano1, Andrea Bobbio3, Gabriele Mantovani1.   

Abstract

Humans typically exhibit a tendency to follow the gaze of conspecifics, a social attention behaviour known as gaze cueing. Here, we addressed whether episodically learned social knowledge about the behaviours performed by the individual bearing the gaze can influence this phenomenon. In a learning phase, different faces were systematically associated with either positive or negative behaviours. The same faces were then used as stimuli in a gaze-cueing task. The results showed that faces associated with antisocial norm-violating behaviours triggered stronger gaze-cueing effects as compared to faces associated with sociable behaviours. Importantly, this was especially evident for participants who perceived the presented norm-violating behaviours as far more negative as compared to positive behaviours. These findings suggest that reflexive attentional responses can be affected by our appraisal of the valence of the behaviours of individuals around us.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Episodic learning; Gaze cueing; Social cognition; Visual attention

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27837290     DOI: 10.1007/s10339-016-0785-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Process        ISSN: 1612-4782


  27 in total

1.  An fMRI study of intentional and unintentional (embarrassing) violations of social norms.

Authors:  S Berthoz; J L Armony; R J R Blair; R J Dolan
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 13.501

2.  "Rare" emotive faces and attentional orienting.

Authors:  Gustav Kuhn; Alan Pickering; Geoff G Cole
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2015-08-31

3.  A practical solution to the pervasive problems of p values.

Authors:  Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-10

4.  The politics of attention: gaze-cuing effects are moderated by political temperament.

Authors:  Michael D Dodd; John R Hibbing; Kevin B Smith
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Physical self-similarity enhances the gaze-cueing effect.

Authors:  Clara J Hungr; Amelia R Hunt
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 2.143

6.  Re-encountering individuals who previously engaged in joint gaze modulates subsequent gaze cueing.

Authors:  Mario Dalmaso; S Gareth Edwards; Andrew P Bayliss
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  The attracting power of the gaze of politicians is modulated by the personality and ideological attitude of their voters: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study.

Authors:  Valentina Cazzato; Marco Tullio Liuzza; Gian Vittorio Caprara; Emiliano Macaluso; Salvatore Maria Aglioti
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 3.386

8.  Familiarity accentuates gaze cuing in women but not men.

Authors:  Robert O Deaner; Stephen V Shepherd; Michael L Platt
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2007-02-22       Impact factor: 3.703

9.  Interpersonal multisensory stimulation reduces the overwhelming distracting power of self-gaze: psychophysical evidence for 'engazement'.

Authors:  Giuseppina Porciello; Brittany Serra Holmes; Marco Tullio Liuzza; Filippo Crostella; Salvatore Maria Aglioti; Ilaria Bufalari
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Temporal dynamics underlying the modulation of social status on social attention.

Authors:  Mario Dalmaso; Giovanni Galfano; Carol Coricelli; Luigi Castelli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  8 in total

1.  Attention holding elicited by direct-gaze faces is reflected in saccadic peak velocity.

Authors:  Mario Dalmaso; Luigi Castelli; Giovanni Galfano
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Is 'heavy' up or down? Testing the vertical spatial representation of weight.

Authors:  Michele Vicovaro; Mario Dalmaso
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2020-03-13

3.  How social exclusion modulates social information processing: A behavioural dissociation between facial expressions and gaze direction.

Authors:  Francesco Bossi; Marcello Gallucci; Paola Ricciardelli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Seeing eye-to-eye: Social gaze interactions influence gaze direction identification.

Authors:  S Gareth Edwards; Andrew P Bayliss
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 5.  Examining joint attention with the use of humanoid robots-A new approach to study fundamental mechanisms of social cognition.

Authors:  Pauline Chevalier; Kyveli Kompatsiari; Francesca Ciardo; Agnieszka Wykowska
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2020-04

6.  Does self-construal shape automatic social attention?

Authors:  Ronda F Lo; Andy H Ng; Adam S Cohen; Joni Y Sasaki
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Wearing the face mask affects our social attention over space.

Authors:  Caterina Villani; Stefania D'Ascenzo; Elisa Scerrati; Paola Ricciardelli; Roberto Nicoletti; Luisa Lugli
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-08-04

8.  Socially induced negative affective knowledge modulates early face perception but not gaze cueing of attention.

Authors:  Magdalena Matyjek; Bartłomiej Kroczek; Magdalena Senderecka
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 4.016

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.