Sarah Pearlstein1, Sarah A Sabrudin1, Ali Shayesteh2, Eric R Tecce1, Mitchell Roslin1. 1. Department of General surgery, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell at Lenox Hill Hospital Program, New York, NY, 10021, USA. 2. Department of General surgery, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell at Lenox Hill Hospital Program, New York, NY, 10021, USA. a.shayesteh3@gmail.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Inadequate weight loss following LAGB (laparoscopic adjusted gastric banding) requiring band removal and conversion to another bariatric procedure is common. There is a paucity of objective data to guide procedure selection. Single anastomosis modifications (SIPS, SADI, SADS) of the duodenal switch biliopancreatic division (DS-BPD) are being investigated. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has become the most prevalent primary bariatric procedure and has been used for revision following LAGB. PURPOSE: The purpose is to investigate single-stage LAGB removal to LSG SADS (single anastomosis duodenal switch). A matched cohort analysis compared each revision to a similar patient having a primary procedure. This was performed to understand the impact of prior banding on outcomes with each procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study to investigate the outcomes of revision of LAGB for inadequate weight loss to LSG or SADS. To determine whether prior banding impairs results, a matched cohort was done comparing each revision to a patient that had a primary procedure. RESULTS: As expected, patients who had SADS had greater weight loss than LSG. There was no difference in peri-operative and early complications. Both procedures resulted in weight loss. Importantly, with matched cohort, prior LAGB decreased weight loss outcomes in LSG, but not SADS. CONCLUSION: Conversion of LAGB to LSG or SADS results in weight loss. The presence of LAGB decreases weight loss in LSG, but not in SADS. This can have important implications for long-term outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Inadequate weight loss following LAGB (laparoscopic adjusted gastric banding) requiring band removal and conversion to another bariatric procedure is common. There is a paucity of objective data to guide procedure selection. Single anastomosis modifications (SIPS, SADI, SADS) of the duodenal switch biliopancreatic division (DS-BPD) are being investigated. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has become the most prevalent primary bariatric procedure and has been used for revision following LAGB. PURPOSE: The purpose is to investigate single-stage LAGB removal to LSG SADS (single anastomosis duodenal switch). A matched cohort analysis compared each revision to a similar patient having a primary procedure. This was performed to understand the impact of prior banding on outcomes with each procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study to investigate the outcomes of revision of LAGB for inadequate weight loss to LSG or SADS. To determine whether prior banding impairs results, a matched cohort was done comparing each revision to a patient that had a primary procedure. RESULTS: As expected, patients who had SADS had greater weight loss than LSG. There was no difference in peri-operative and early complications. Both procedures resulted in weight loss. Importantly, with matched cohort, prior LAGB decreased weight loss outcomes in LSG, but not SADS. CONCLUSION: Conversion of LAGB to LSG or SADS results in weight loss. The presence of LAGB decreases weight loss in LSG, but not in SADS. This can have important implications for long-term outcomes.
Authors: Edo O Aarts; Kemal Dogan; Parweez Koehestanie; Ignace M C Janssen; Frits J Berends Journal: Surg Obes Relat Dis Date: 2013-10-25 Impact factor: 4.734
Authors: Luigi Angrisani; A Santonicola; P Iovino; A Vitiello; K Higa; J Himpens; H Buchwald; N Scopinaro Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2018-12 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Wendy A Brown; Guillermo Ponce de Leon Ballesteros; Geraldine Ooi; Kelvin Higa; Jacques Himpens; Antonio Torres; Scott Shikora; Lilian Kow; Miguel F Herrera Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2021-01-06 Impact factor: 4.129