Literature DB >> 22699516

Aspirin in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in the Women's Health Study: effect of noncompliance.

Nancy R Cook1, Stephen R Cole, Julie E Buring.   

Abstract

Randomized evidence for aspirin in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) among women is limited and suggests at most a modest effect for total CVD. Lack of compliance, however, can null-bias estimated effects. We used marginal structural models (MSMs) to estimate the etiologic effect of continuous aspirin use on CVD events among 39,876 apparently healthy female health professionals aged 45 years and older in the Women's Health Study, a randomized trial of 100 mg aspirin every other day versus placebo. As-treated analyses and MSMs controlled for time-varying determinants of aspirin use and CVD. Predictors of aspirin use differed by randomized group and prior use and included medical history, CVD risk factors, and intermediate CVD events. Previously reported intent-to-treat analyses found small non-significant effects of aspirin on total CVD (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.91, 95 % confidence interval (CI) = 0.81-1.03) and CVD mortality (HR = 0.95, 95 % CI = 0.74-1.22). As-treated analyses were similar for total CVD with a slight reduction in CVD mortality (HR = 0.88, 95 % CI = 0.67-1.16). MSMs, which adjusted for non-compliance, were similar for total CVD (HR = 0.93; 95 % CI: 0.81, 1.07) but suggested lower CVD mortality with aspirin use (HR = 0.76; 95 % CI: 0.54, 1.08). Adjusting for non-compliance had little impact on the estimated effect of aspirin on total CVD, but strengthened the effect on CVD mortality. These results support a limited effect of low-dose aspirin on total CVD in women, but potential benefit for CVD mortality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22699516      PMCID: PMC3383873          DOI: 10.1007/s10654-012-9702-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0393-2990            Impact factor:   8.082


  19 in total

1.  Marginal structural models to estimate the causal effect of zidovudine on the survival of HIV-positive men.

Authors:  M A Hernán; B Brumback; J M Robins
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.822

2.  Low-dose aspirin for migraine prophylaxis in women.

Authors:  I M Benseñor; N R Cook; I M Lee; M J Chown; C H Hennekens; J E Buring
Journal:  Cephalalgia       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 6.292

3.  Use of a marginal structural model to determine the effect of aspirin on cardiovascular mortality in the Physicians' Health Study.

Authors:  Nancy R Cook; Stephen R Cole; Charles H Hennekens
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2002-06-01       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Aspirin for the primary prevention of cardiovascular events: recommendation and rationale.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-01-15       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Collaborative meta-analysis of randomised trials of antiplatelet therapy for prevention of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke in high risk patients.

Authors: 
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-01-12

6.  Baseline characteristics of participants in the Women's Health Study.

Authors:  K M Rexrode; I M Lee; N R Cook; C H Hennekens; J E Buring
Journal:  J Womens Health Gend Based Med       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb

7.  Final report on the aspirin component of the ongoing Physicians' Health Study.

Authors: 
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1989-07-20       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Secondary prevention of vascular disease by prolonged antiplatelet treatment. Antiplatelet Trialists' Collaboration.

Authors: 
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1988-01-30

9.  Randomised trial of prophylactic daily aspirin in British male doctors.

Authors:  R Peto; R Gray; R Collins; K Wheatley; C Hennekens; K Jamrozik; C Warlow; B Hafner; E Thompson; S Norton
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1988-01-30

10.  Aspirin in the primary and secondary prevention of vascular disease: collaborative meta-analysis of individual participant data from randomised trials.

Authors:  Colin Baigent; Lisa Blackwell; Rory Collins; Jonathan Emberson; Jon Godwin; Richard Peto; Julie Buring; Charles Hennekens; Patricia Kearney; Tom Meade; Carlo Patrono; Maria Carla Roncaglioni; Alberto Zanchetti
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2009-05-30       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  8 in total

1.  The Choice of Analytical Strategies in Inverse-Probability-of-Treatment-Weighted Analysis: A Simulation Study.

Authors:  Shibing Yang; Juan Lu; Charles B Eaton; Spencer Harpe; Kate L Lapane
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  The Rotterdam Study: 2014 objectives and design update.

Authors:  Albert Hofman; Sarwa Darwish Murad; Cornelia M van Duijn; Oscar H Franco; André Goedegebure; M Arfan Ikram; Caroline C W Klaver; Tamar E C Nijsten; Robin P Peeters; Bruno H Ch Stricker; Henning W Tiemeier; André G Uitterlinden; Meike W Vernooij
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 8.082

Review 3.  Application of marginal structural models in pharmacoepidemiologic studies: a systematic review.

Authors:  Shibing Yang; Charles B Eaton; Juan Lu; Kate L Lapane
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 2.890

4.  The Generation R Study: Biobank update 2015.

Authors:  Claudia J Kruithof; Marjolein N Kooijman; Cornelia M van Duijn; Oscar H Franco; Johan C de Jongste; Caroline C W Klaver; Johan P Mackenbach; Henriëtte A Moll; Hein Raat; Edmond H H M Rings; Fernando Rivadeneira; Eric A P Steegers; Henning Tiemeier; Andre G Uitterlinden; Frank C Verhulst; Eppo B Wolvius; Albert Hofman; Vincent W V Jaddoe
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-12-21       Impact factor: 8.082

5.  Comparing a marginal structural model with a Cox proportional hazard model to estimate the effect of time-dependent drug use in observational studies: statin use for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease as an example from the Rotterdam Study.

Authors:  Catherine E de Keyser; Maarten J G Leening; Silvana A Romio; J Wouter Jukema; Albert Hofman; M Arfan Ikram; Oscar H Franco; Theo Stijnen; Bruno H Stricker
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 8.082

Review 6.  Aspirin Use in Women: Current Perspectives and Future Directions.

Authors:  Amy Sarma; Nandita S Scott
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 5.113

7.  Aspirin Use and Mortality in Two Contemporary US Cohorts.

Authors:  Wen-Yi Huang; Sarah E Daugherty; Meredith S Shiels; Mark P Purdue; Neal D Freedman; Christian C Abnet; Albert R Hollenbeck; Richard B Hayes; Debra T Silverman; Sonja I Berndt
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 4.822

Review 8.  A systematic review of aspirin in primary prevention: is it time for a new approach?

Authors:  Carlos Brotons; Robert Benamouzig; Krzysztof J Filipiak; Volker Limmroth; Claudio Borghi
Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Drugs       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.571

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.