Literature DB >> 24457060

Comparison of rates of and charges from pregnancy complications in users of extended and cyclic combined oral contraceptive (COC) regimens: a brief report.

Brandon Howard1, James Trussell2, ElizaBeth Grubb3, Maureen J Lage4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate pregnancy complication rates and related charges in users of 84/7, 21/7 and 24/4 combined oral contraceptives (COCs). STUDY
DESIGN: Data were obtained from the i3 InVision Data Mart™ retrospective claims database. Subjects were aged 15-40 years, first prescribed a COC between 1/1/2006 and 4/1/2011 and continuously insured for ≥1 year. 84/7 users were matched 1:1 to 21/7 and 24/4 users.
RESULTS: Pregnancy-related complication rates and associated charges were significantly lower with 84/7 vs. 21/7 and 24/4 regimens.
CONCLUSION: Preliminary data suggest 84/7 regimens may be associated with fewer pregnancy complications and lower related charges.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  84/7, 21/7, 24/4 regimens; Hormonal contraception; Pregnancy rates

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24457060      PMCID: PMC4019686          DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2013.12.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  8 in total

Review 1.  Intention to become pregnant and low birth weight and preterm birth: a systematic review.

Authors:  Prakesh S Shah; Taiba Balkhair; Arne Ohlsson; Joseph Beyene; Fran Scott; Corine Frick
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2011-02

2.  Comparison of rates of and charges from pregnancy complications in users of extended and cyclic combined oral contraceptive (COC) regimens: a brief report.

Authors:  Brandon Howard; James Trussell; ElizaBeth Grubb; Maureen J Lage
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2013-12-26       Impact factor: 3.375

3.  Effectiveness of oral contraceptive pills in a large U.S. cohort comparing progestogen and regimen.

Authors:  Jürgen Dinger; Thai Do Minh; Nina Buttmann; Kristina Bardenheuer
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Pregnancy intention and its relationship to birth and maternal outcomes.

Authors:  A P Mohllajee; K M Curtis; B Morrow; P A Marchbanks
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Evaluation of pituitary-ovarian axis suppression with three oral contraceptive regimens.

Authors:  Misty A Vandever; Thomas J Kuehl; Patricia J Sulak; Iris Witt; Andrea Coffee; Thomas J Wincek; Kathleen Z Reape
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2008-01-11       Impact factor: 3.375

6.  Comparison of serum and cervical mucus hormone levels during hormone-free interval of 24/4 vs. 21/7 combined oral contraceptives.

Authors:  Heather Fels; Rachel Steward; Alexander Melamed; Anna Granat; Frank Z Stanczyk; Daniel R Mishell
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 3.375

Review 7.  The creeping Pearl: Why has the rate of contraceptive failure increased in clinical trials of combined hormonal contraceptive pills?

Authors:  James Trussell; David Portman
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 3.375

8.  A multicenter, randomized study of an extended cycle oral contraceptive.

Authors:  F D Anderson; Howard Hait
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.375

  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  Comparison of rates of and charges from pregnancy complications in users of extended and cyclic combined oral contraceptive (COC) regimens: a brief report.

Authors:  Brandon Howard; James Trussell; ElizaBeth Grubb; Maureen J Lage
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2013-12-26       Impact factor: 3.375

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.