A P Mohllajee1, K M Curtis, B Morrow, P A Marchbanks. 1. Division of Reproductive Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. amohllaj@hsph.harvard.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine whether there are associations between pregnancy intention (intended, unwanted, mistimed, or ambivalent) and negative birth and maternal outcomes: low birth weight (less than 2,500 g), preterm delivery (fewer than 37 weeks), small for gestational age, premature labor, hypertension, and other maternal outcomes. METHODS: We analyzed data from the population-based Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System, including 87,087 women who gave birth between 1996 and 1999 in 18 states. Information on pregnancy outcomes was derived from birth certificate data and a self-administered questionnaire completed postpartum. We employed SUDAAN (RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC) for univariable and logistical regression analyses. RESULTS: In analyses controlling for demographic and behavioral factors, women with unwanted pregnancies had an increased likelihood of preterm delivery (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.16, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.33) and premature rupture of membranes (adjusted OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.01-1.85) compared with women with intended pregnancies. Women who were ambivalent toward their pregnancies had increased odds of delivering a low birth weight infant (adjusted OR 1.15, 95% CI 1.02-1.29); in contrast, women with mistimed pregnancies had a lower likelihood (adjusted OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.86-0.97). CONCLUSION: Pregnancy intention, specifically unwanted and ambivalent, may be an indicator of increased risk for some poor birth and maternal outcomes and should be considered in interventions aimed at improving the health of the mother and child. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
OBJECTIVE: To examine whether there are associations between pregnancy intention (intended, unwanted, mistimed, or ambivalent) and negative birth and maternal outcomes: low birth weight (less than 2,500 g), preterm delivery (fewer than 37 weeks), small for gestational age, premature labor, hypertension, and other maternal outcomes. METHODS: We analyzed data from the population-based Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System, including 87,087 women who gave birth between 1996 and 1999 in 18 states. Information on pregnancy outcomes was derived from birth certificate data and a self-administered questionnaire completed postpartum. We employed SUDAAN (RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC) for univariable and logistical regression analyses. RESULTS: In analyses controlling for demographic and behavioral factors, women with unwanted pregnancies had an increased likelihood of preterm delivery (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.16, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.33) and premature rupture of membranes (adjusted OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.01-1.85) compared with women with intended pregnancies. Women who were ambivalent toward their pregnancies had increased odds of delivering a low birth weight infant (adjusted OR 1.15, 95% CI 1.02-1.29); in contrast, women with mistimed pregnancies had a lower likelihood (adjusted OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.86-0.97). CONCLUSION: Pregnancy intention, specifically unwanted and ambivalent, may be an indicator of increased risk for some poor birth and maternal outcomes and should be considered in interventions aimed at improving the health of the mother and child. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
Authors: Sarah H Heil; Hendree E Jones; Amelia Arria; Karol Kaltenbach; Mara Coyle; Gabriele Fischer; Susan Stine; Peter Selby; Peter R Martin Journal: J Subst Abuse Treat Date: 2010-10-30
Authors: Mishka Terplan; Dennis J Hand; Melissa Hutchinson; Elizabeth Salisbury-Afshar; Sarah H Heil Journal: Prev Med Date: 2015-04-18 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Lindsay M Kuroki; Jenifer E Allsworth; Colleen A Redding; Jeffrey D Blume; Jeffrey F Peipert Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2008-05-12 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Audrey J Gaskins; Janet W Rich-Edwards; Paige L Williams; Thomas L Toth; Stacey A Missmer; Jorge E Chavarro Journal: Eur J Nutr Date: 2016-08-29 Impact factor: 5.614