Literature DB >> 24455011

Effect of resident evaluations of obstetrics and gynecology faculty on promotion.

Diana S Curran, Caren M Stalburg, Xiao Xu, Samantha R Dewald, Elisabeth H Quint.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Promotion for academic faculty depends on a variety of factors, including their research, publications, national leadership, and quality of their teaching.
OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the importance of resident evaluations of faculty for promotion in obstetrics-gynecology programs.
METHODS: A 28-item questionnaire was developed and distributed to 185 department chairs of US obstetrics-gynecology residency programs.
RESULTS: Fifty percent (93 of 185) responded, with 40% (37 of 93) stating that teaching has become more important for promotion in the past 10 years. When faculty are being considered for promotion, teaching evaluations were deemed "very important" 60% of the time for clinician track faculty but were rated as mainly "not important" or "not applicable" for research faculty. Sixteen respondents (17%) stated a faculty member had failed to achieve promotion in the past 5 years because of poor teaching evaluations. Positive teaching evaluations outweighed low publication numbers for clinical faculty 24% of the time, compared with 5% for research faculty and 8% for tenured faculty being considered for promotion. The most common reason for rejection for promotion in all tracks was the number of publications. Awards for excellence in teaching improved chances of promotion.
CONCLUSIONS: Teaching quality is becoming more important in academic obstetrics-gynecology departments, especially for clinical faculty. Although in most institutions promotion is not achieved without adequate research and publications, the importance of teaching excellence is obvious, with 1 of 6 (17%) departments reporting a promotion had been denied due to poor teaching evaluations.

Year:  2013        PMID: 24455011      PMCID: PMC3886461          DOI: 10.4300/JGME-D-13-00002.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Grad Med Educ        ISSN: 1949-8357


  11 in total

1.  Identification of teaching excellence in operating room and clinic settings.

Authors:  Sherralyn S Cox; Melvin S Swanson
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  The next GME accreditation system--rationale and benefits.

Authors:  Thomas J Nasca; Ingrid Philibert; Timothy Brigham; Timothy C Flynn
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Recruiting and rewarding faculty for medical student teaching.

Authors:  Linda F Pessar; Ruth E Levine; Carol A Bernstein; Deborah S Cabaniss; Leah J Dickstein; Sarah V Graff; Deborah J Hales; Carol Nadelson; Carolyn B Robinowitz; Stephen C Scheiber; Paul M Jones; Edward K Silberman
Journal:  Acad Psychiatry       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr

4.  Creative professional activity: an additional platform for promotion of faculty.

Authors:  Wendy Levinson; Arthur I Rothman; Eliot Phillipson
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 6.893

5.  Advancing educators and education by defining the components and evidence associated with educational scholarship.

Authors:  Deborah Simpson; Ruth-Marie E Fincher; Janet P Hafler; David M Irby; Boyd F Richards; Gary C Rosenfeld; Thomas R Viggiano
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2007-09-05       Impact factor: 6.251

6.  The double helix of activity and scholarship: building a medical education career with limited resources.

Authors:  Page S Morahan; Janet Fleetwood
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 6.251

7.  Evidence-based appointment and promotion of academic faculty at the University of Chicago.

Authors:  Martin E Feder; James L Madara
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 6.893

Review 8.  The design and utility of institutional teaching awards: a literature review.

Authors:  Kathryn N Huggett; Ruth B Greenberg; Deepa Rao; Boyd Richards; Sheila W Chauvin; Tracy B Fulton; Summers Kalishman; John Littlefield; Linda Perkowski; Lynne Robins; Deborah Simpson
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 3.650

9.  New tools for systematic evaluation of teaching qualities of medical faculty: results of an ongoing multi-center survey.

Authors:  Onyebuchi A Arah; Joost B L Hoekstra; Albert P Bos; Kiki M J M H Lombarts
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Medical school faculty discontent: prevalence and predictors of intent to leave academic careers.

Authors:  Steven R Lowenstein; Genaro Fernandez; Lori A Crane
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2007-10-14       Impact factor: 2.463

View more
  3 in total

1.  Defining the scholarly and scholarship common program requirements.

Authors:  Deborah Simpson; Lalena M Yarris; Peter J Carek
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2013-12

2.  Scholarly activity in the next accreditation system: moving from structure and process to outcomes.

Authors:  Ingrid Philibert; Mary Lieh-Lai; Rebecca Miller; John R Potts; Timothy Brigham; Thomas J Nasca
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2013-12

3.  The Association Between Pediatric Faculty Factors and Resident Physician Ratings of Teaching Effectiveness.

Authors:  Nicholas M Potisek; Laura Page; Aditee Narayan; Kenya McNeal-Trice; Michael J Steiner
Journal:  Glob Pediatr Health       Date:  2019-01-24
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.