Literature DB >> 24453532

Reproducibility of outdoor flat and uphill cycling time trials and their performance correlates with peak power output in moderately trained cyclists.

Frankie H Y Tan1, Abdul Rashid Aziz1.   

Abstract

The aims of the present study were firstly to examine the reproducibility of outdoor flat and uphill cycling time trials (TT), and secondly to assess the relationship between peak power output (Wpeak) obtained in the laboratory and outdoor cycling performance in moderately trained cyclists. Eight competitive male cyclists first performed a progressive cycle ergometer test in the laboratory to determine Wpeak (W). Thereafter, they performed three 36 km TT (TT36) on a flat course on separate days and at the same time of the day. On a different day, they also performed three 1.4 km uphill TT (TT1.4) in a single day. The coefficient of variation (CV) values across three TT36 and TT1.4 ranged from 1.1 - 1.4% and 2.6 - 2.9%, for performance time (min) and mean power (W), respectively. The correlation between absolute Wpeak (W) obtained in the laboratory and mean power during TT36 and TT1.4 was 0.90 (p < 0.01) and 0.98 (p < 0.01), respectively. Absolute Wpeak (W) correlated significantly with performance time in TT36 (r = -0.72, p < 0.05) but not in TT1.4 (r = -0.52, p > 0.05). The correlation between relative Wpeak (W·kg(-1)) and performance time in TT36 and TT1.4 was r = -0.65 (p > 0.05) and r = -0.91 (p < 0.01), respectively. In conclusion, under stable environmental conditions, performance time and mean power are highly reproducible in moderately trained cyclists during outdoor cycling TT. Laboratory determined absolute Wpeak (W) may predict cycling performance on a flat course but relative Wpeak (W·kg(-1)) is a better predictor of performance during uphill cycling. Key PointsUnder stable environmental conditions, performance time and mean power are highly reproducible in moderately trained cyclists during outdoor flat and uphill cycling time trials.Laboratory determined peak power output (Wpeak) (W) may predict cycling performance on a flat course.Laboratory determined relative Wpeak (W·kg(-1)) is a better predictor of performance during uphill cycling.

Keywords:  Field-based; PowerTap powermeter; heart rate; mean power; performance time; reliability

Year:  2005        PMID: 24453532      PMCID: PMC3887331     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci Med        ISSN: 1303-2968            Impact factor:   2.988


  21 in total

1.  Peak power predicts performance power during an outdoor 16.1-km cycling time trial.

Authors:  J Balmer; R C Davison; S R Bird
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 5.411

2.  Measures of reliability in sports medicine and science.

Authors:  W G Hopkins
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 3.  Physiological and performance characteristics of male professional road cyclists.

Authors:  I Mujika; S Padilla
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Day to day variation in time trial cycling performance.

Authors:  M S Hickey; D L Costill; G K McConell; J J Widrick; H Tanaka
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 3.118

5.  Assessment of the reproducibility of performance testing on an air-braked cycle ergometer.

Authors:  G S Palmer; S C Dennis; T D Noakes; J A Hawley
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 3.118

6.  A new reliable laboratory test of endurance performance for road cyclists.

Authors:  E J Schabort; J A Hawley; W G Hopkins; I Mujika; T D Noakes
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 5.411

7.  A new validated endurance performance test.

Authors:  A Jeukendrup; W H Saris; F Brouns; A D Kester
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 5.411

8.  Variability of time to exhaustion during submaximal exercise.

Authors:  T M McLellan; S S Cheung; I Jacobs
Journal:  Can J Appl Physiol       Date:  1995-03

9.  Gender differences in rowing performance and power with aging.

Authors:  K S Seiler; W W Spirduso; J C Martin
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 5.411

10.  Accuracy of SRM and power tap power monitoring systems for bicycling.

Authors:  Andrew S Gardner; Shaun Stephens; David T Martin; Evan Lawton; Hamilton Lee; David Jenkins
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.411

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Validity, reliability and sensitivity of measures of sporting performance.

Authors:  Kevin Currell; Asker E Jeukendrup
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  The effects of bicycle frame geometry on muscle activation and power during a wingate anaerobic test.

Authors:  Mark D Ricard; Patrick Hills-Meyer; Michael G Miller; Timothy J Michael
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2006-03-01       Impact factor: 2.988

3.  The Validity of Functional Threshold Power and Maximal Oxygen Uptake for Cycling Performance in Moderately Trained Cyclists.

Authors:  Arne Sørensen; Tore Kristian Aune; Vegar Rangul; Terje Dalen
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.