Literature DB >> 1428377

Day to day variation in time trial cycling performance.

M S Hickey1, D L Costill, G K McConell, J J Widrick, H Tanaka.   

Abstract

In an attempt to assess the reproducibility of laboratory cycling performance, eight well-trained (VO2max = 4.6 +/- 0.2 l.min-1) male cyclists completed 12 trials involving 4 successive performance rides at each of three total work outputs (approximately 1600, 200, and 14 kilojoules, respectively). These trials, designated as long, medium, and short trials (LT, MT, ST), represented exercise bouts of 105.12 +/- 0.41, 12.03 +/- 0.17 and 0.55 +/- 0.11 minutes, respectively. The trials, conducted on a computerized cycle ergometer in an isokinetic mode, were separated by a minimum of 72 hrs. All trials for each subject were completed at the same time of day. In all trials, subjects were allowed to select the pace in order to complete the ride in the shortest possible time. The mean coefficient of variation (CV) for performance time in each trial was: LT = +/- 1.01%, MT = +/- 0.95%, and ST = +/- 2.43%, respectively. The CV for performance time in ST was significantly greater than the CV in either LT or MT. In LT, performance time was significantly faster, and the mean % VO2max was significantly higher in trial 4 versus trials 1-3. There was no order effect in the MT or ST rides. The CV for mean VO2 (l.min-1), mean % VO2max, and RER during the LT rides were +/- 3.02%, +/- 3.64%, and +/- 3.53%, respectively. These data suggest that trained cyclists have the ability to reproduce endurance performance with a CV of approximately 1.0% in a time-trial protocol.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1428377     DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-1021299

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Sports Med        ISSN: 0172-4622            Impact factor:   3.118


  14 in total

Review 1.  The scientific basis for high-intensity interval training: optimising training programmes and maximising performance in highly trained endurance athletes.

Authors:  Paul B Laursen; David G Jenkins
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 2.  Respiratory muscle training in healthy individuals: physiological rationale and implications for exercise performance.

Authors:  A William Sheel
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  The reliability of a simulated uphill time trial using the Velotron electronic bicycle ergometer.

Authors:  Eric E Noreen; Kathyrn Yamamoto; Kelli Clair
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-06-05       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Cycling time trial performance during different phases of the menstrual cycle.

Authors:  Tanja Oosthuyse; Andrew N Bosch; Susan Jackson
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2005-03-19       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Prediction of time to exhaustion from blood lactate response during submaximal exercise in competitive cyclists.

Authors:  A Sassi; S M Marcora; E Rampinini; P Mognoni; F M Impellizzeri
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2006-03-09       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 6.  Validity, reliability and sensitivity of measures of sporting performance.

Authors:  Kevin Currell; Asker E Jeukendrup
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 7.  Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine.

Authors:  G Atkinson; A M Nevill
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 11.136

8.  Deception of ambient and body core temperature improves self paced cycling in hot, humid conditions.

Authors:  Paul C Castle; Neil Maxwell; Alan Allchorn; Alexis R Mauger; Danny K White
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-05-15       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 9.  Neurophysiological determinants of theoretical concepts and mechanisms involved in pacing.

Authors:  Bart Roelands; Jos de Koning; Carl Foster; Floor Hettinga; Romain Meeusen
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 11.136

10.  Endurance exercise performance in acute hypoxia is influenced by expiratory flow limitation.

Authors:  Joshua C Weavil; Joseph W Duke; Jonathon L Stickford; Joel M Stager; Robert F Chapman; Timothy D Mickleborough
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 3.078

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.