Literature DB >> 8609299

Children's processing of prosodic cues for phrasal interpretation.

C M Beach1, W F Katz, A Skowronski.   

Abstract

Using synthetic speech, word duration and fundamental frequency (F0) contours were parametrically manipulated to examine processes of phrasal interpretation by adult and child (5 and 7 years old) listeners. From an adult male voice, versions of the phrase "pink and green and white" were resynthesized to produce stimuli suggesting two possible interpretations: [(pink and green) and white] and [pink and (green and white)]. For each stimulus, listeners pointed to a picture to indicate which interpretation was intended. All subjects used duration and (to a lesser extent) intonation as perceptually salient cues for phrasal interpretation. The manner in which subjects processed this information was evaluated by comparing subjects' performance with the predictions of three different information processing models: a nonindependent cue-evaluation model, and two independent cue-evaluation models (an additive model, and the multiplicative, fuzzy logical model). Performance was best described by the fuzzy logical model, which assumes independent cue evaluation and generates a classification function characterized by cue trading relations. The results suggest that, similar to adults, children as young as 5 years of age rely on acoustic-prosodic information for syntactic phrase interpretation, and they process this information in an adultlike manner.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8609299     DOI: 10.1121/1.414599

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  4 in total

1.  The acoustic salience of prosody trumps infants' acquired knowledge of language-specific prosodic patterns.

Authors:  Kara Hawthorne; Reiko Mazuka; LouAnn Gerken
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 3.059

2.  Effects of prosodic and lexical constraints on parsing in young children (and adults).

Authors:  Jesse Snedeker
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.059

3.  Cross-linguistic differences in prosodic cues to syntactic disambiguation in German and English.

Authors:  Mary Grantham O'Brien; Carrie N Jackson; Christine E Gardner
Journal:  Appl Psycholinguist       Date:  2014-01-01

4.  Young children's use of prosody in sentence parsing.

Authors:  Youngon Choi; Reiko Mazuka
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2003-03
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.