Literature DB >> 24452674

What factors influence minority use of National Cancer Institute-designated cancer centers?

Lyen C Huang1, Yifei Ma, Justine V Ngo, Kim F Rhoads.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: National Cancer Institute (NCI) cancer centers provide high-quality care and are associated with better outcomes. However, racial and ethnic minority populations tend not to use these settings. The current study sought to understand what factors influence minority use of NCI cancer centers.
METHODS: A data set containing California Cancer Registry (CCR) data linked to patient discharge abstracts identified all patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) who were treated from 1996 through 2006. Multivariable models were generated to predict the use of NCI settings by race. Geographic proximity to an NCI center and patient sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were assessed.
RESULTS: Approximately 5% of all identified patients with CRC (n = 79,231) were treated in NCI settings. The median travel distance for treatment for all patients in all hospitals was ≤ 5 miles. A higher percentage of minorities lived near an NCI cancer center compared with whites. A baseline multivariable model predicting use showed a negative association between Hispanic ethnicity and NCI center use (odds ratio, 0.71; 95% confidence interval, 0.64-0.79). Asian/Pacific Islander patients were more likely to use NCI centers (odds ratio, 1.41; 95% confidence interval, 1.28-1.54). There was no difference in use noted among black patients. Increasing living distance from an NCI cancer center was found to be predictive of lower odds of use for all populations. Medicare and Medicaid insurance statuses were positively associated with NCI center use. Neighborhood-level education was found to be a more powerful predictor of NCI use than poverty or unemployment.
CONCLUSIONS: Select minority groups underuse NCI cancer centers for CRC treatment. Sociodemographic factors and proximity to NCI centers are important predictors of use. Interventions to address these factors may improve minority attendance to NCI cancer centers for care.
© 2013 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  National Cancer Institute-designated cancer centers; access to care; colorectal cancer; health care disparities; insurance coverage; socioeconomic factors

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24452674      PMCID: PMC3905240          DOI: 10.1002/cncr.28413

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  39 in total

Review 1.  Geocoding and monitoring of US socioeconomic inequalities in mortality and cancer incidence: does the choice of area-based measure and geographic level matter?: the Public Health Disparities Geocoding Project.

Authors:  Nancy Krieger; Jarvis T Chen; Pamela D Waterman; Mah-Jabeen Soobader; S V Subramanian; Rosa Carson
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2002-09-01       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Primary care physicians who treat blacks and whites.

Authors:  Peter B Bach; Hoangmai H Pham; Deborah Schrag; Ramsey C Tate; J Lee Hargraves
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-08-05       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Correlation of travel time on roads versus straight line distance.

Authors:  C S Phibbs; H S Luft
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 3.929

4.  Overcoming the absence of socioeconomic data in medical records: validation and application of a census-based methodology.

Authors:  N Krieger
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 5.  Measuring social class in US public health research: concepts, methodologies, and guidelines.

Authors:  N Krieger; D R Williams; N E Moss
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 21.981

6.  The impact of socioeconomic status and race on trial participation for older women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Cary P Gross; Giovanni Filardo; Susan T Mayne; Harlan M Krumholz
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2005-02-01       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Patient preferences for location of care: implications for regionalization.

Authors:  S R Finlayson; J D Birkmeyer; A N Tosteson; R F Nease
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Do cancer centers designated by the National Cancer Institute have better surgical outcomes?

Authors:  Nancy J O Birkmeyer; Philip P Goodney; Therese A Stukel; Bruce E Hillner; John D Birkmeyer
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2005-02-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Emerging and widening colorectal carcinoma disparities between Blacks and Whites in the United States (1975-2002).

Authors:  Kimberly Irby; William F Anderson; Donald E Henson; Susan S Devesa
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.254

10.  Black patients more likely than whites to undergo surgery at low-quality hospitals in segregated regions.

Authors:  Justin Dimick; Joel Ruhter; Mary Vaughan Sarrazin; John D Birkmeyer
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 6.301

View more
  17 in total

1.  Cancer Center Website Rankings in the USA: Expanding Benchmarks and Standards for Effective Public Outreach and Education.

Authors:  Timothy R Huerta; Daniel M Walker; Eric W Ford
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Capsule commentary on Anderson et al., quality of care and racial disparities in medicare among potential ACOs.

Authors:  Kim F Rhoads
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Factors that influence minority use of high-volume hospitals for colorectal cancer care.

Authors:  Lyen C Huang; Thuy B Tran; Yifei Ma; Justine V Ngo; Kim F Rhoads
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 4.585

4.  American College of Rheumatology White Paper on Performance Outcome Measures in Rheumatology.

Authors:  Lisa G Suter; Claire E Barber; Jeph Herrin; Amye Leong; Elena Losina; Amy Miller; Eric Newman; Mark Robbins; Heather Tory; Jinoos Yazdany
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 4.794

5.  Minority Use of a National Cancer Institute-Designated Comprehensive Cancer Center and Non-specialty Hospitals in Two Florida Regions.

Authors:  Dawood H Sultan; Jemal Gishe; Angella Hanciles; Meg M Comins; Claire M Norris
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2015-01-29

6.  Population-Level Differences in Rectal Cancer Survival in Uninsured Patients Are Partially Explained by Differences in Treatment.

Authors:  Dianne Pulte; Lina Jansen; Hermann Brenner
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2017-02-20

7.  Early mortality and complications in hospitalized adult Californians with acute myeloid leukaemia.

Authors:  Gwendolyn Ho; Brian A Jonas; Qian Li; Ann Brunson; Ted Wun; Theresa H M Keegan
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 6.998

8.  Impact of care at comprehensive cancer centers on outcome: Results from a population-based study.

Authors:  Julie A Wolfson; Can-Lan Sun; Laura P Wyatt; Arti Hurria; Smita Bhatia
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Impact of minimally invasive surgery on short-term outcomes after rectal resection for neoplasm within the setting of an enhanced recovery program.

Authors:  Allison N Martin; Puja Shah Berry; Charles M Friel; Traci L Hedrick
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Measuring Institutional Quality in Head and Neck Surgery Using Hospital-Level Data: Negative Margin Rates and Neck Dissection Yield.

Authors:  David W Schoppy; Kim F Rhoads; Yifei Ma; Michelle M Chen; Brian Nussenbaum; Ryan K Orosco; Eben L Rosenthal; Vasu Divi
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 6.223

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.