Literature DB >> 15597407

The impact of socioeconomic status and race on trial participation for older women with breast cancer.

Cary P Gross1, Giovanni Filardo, Susan T Mayne, Harlan M Krumholz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Older women, and older minorities in particular, are under represented in breast cancer trials. Although socioeconomic status (SES) is associated with both race and age, to the authors' knowledge little is known regarding the impact of SES on trial enrollment among older women with breast cancer.
METHODS: The authors performed a case-control study comparing women who were participants in National Cancer Institute cooperative group breast cancer trials (cases) with a population-based sample of breast cancer patients (controls) obtained from the linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare data base. The sample was restricted to women age >/= 65 years who were living in SEER areas. Proxies for SES included the proportion of the population below poverty level (by zip code) and unemployed (by county) as well those with Medicaid insurance coverage. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to test the association of SES with trial participation after accounting for other patient and county characteristics.
RESULTS: In bivariate analysis, trial participants were significantly less likely than community cancer patients to reside in high-poverty zip codes (20.9% vs. 24.9%, respectively; P < 0.001) or to have Medicaid insurance (2.0% vs. 10.0%; P < 0.0001). After adjusting for race, age, and county, trial participation remained inversely related to residing in areas with high poverty (odds ratio [OR] vs. residents of remaining counties, 0.78; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.62-0.98), high unemployment rates (OR vs. residents of residents of counties in the lowest quartile, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.35-0.71), and having Medicaid insurance (OR vs. women without Medicaid, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.13-0.37); black race was not found to be related to trial participation (OR for black vs. white, 1.0; 95% CI, 0.67-1.47).
CONCLUSIONS: Low SES was associated inversely with trial enrollment for older women with breast cancer and appeared to account for the enrollment disparities between black patients and white patients. Future efforts to enhance enrollment of elderly women in cancer research should identify specific barriers related to SES that may be amenable to intervention. (c) 2004 American Cancer Society

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15597407     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.20792

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  74 in total

1.  Socioeconomic and clinical factors are key to uncovering disparity in accrual onto therapeutic trials for breast cancer.

Authors:  Carolyn E Behrendt; Arti Hurria; Lusine Tumyan; Joyce C Niland; Joanne E Mortimer
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 11.908

2.  Recruitment of African Americans to National Oncology Clinical Trials through a clinical trial shared resource.

Authors:  Debra Wujcik; Steven N Wolff
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2010-02

3.  Factors influencing enrollment of African Americans in the Look AHEAD trial.

Authors:  David L Mount; Cralen Davis; Betty Kennedy; Susan Raatz; Kathy Dotson; Tiffany L Gary-Webb; Sheikilya Thomas; Karen C Johnson; Mark A Espeland
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 2.486

4.  Barriers to recruitment of rural patients in cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  Shamsuddin Virani; Lola Burke; Scot C Remick; Jame Abraham
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.840

5.  What factors influence minority use of National Cancer Institute-designated cancer centers?

Authors:  Lyen C Huang; Yifei Ma; Justine V Ngo; Kim F Rhoads
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Insurance Clearance for Early-Phase Oncology Clinical Trials Following the Affordable Care Act.

Authors:  Kenneth L Kehl; Cheryl P Fullmer; Siqing Fu; Goldy C George; Kenneth R Hess; Filip Janku; Daniel D Karp; Shumei Kato; Cynthia K Kizer; Razelle Kurzrock; Aung Naing; Shubham Pant; Sarina A Piha-Paul; Vivek Subbiah; Apostolia M Tsimberidou; David S Hong
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  Barriers to therapeutic clinical trials enrollment: differences between African-American and white cancer patients identified at the time of eligibility assessment.

Authors:  Lynne Penberthy; Richard Brown; Maureen Wilson-Genderson; Bassam Dahman; Gordon Ginder; Laura A Siminoff
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2012-10-02       Impact factor: 2.486

Review 8.  The ethics of uninsured participants accessing healthcare in biomedical research: A literature review.

Authors:  Hae Lin Cho; Marion Danis; Christine Grady
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 2.486

9.  Beliefs of women's risk as research subjects: a four-city study examining differences by sex and by race/ethnicity.

Authors:  Stefanie L Russell; Ralph V Katz; Nancy R Kressin; B Lee Green; Min Qi Wang; Cristina Claudio; Krassimira Tzvetkova
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.681

10.  Involving American Indians and medically underserved rural populations in cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  B Ashleigh Guadagnolo; Daniel G Petereit; Petra Helbig; David Koop; Patricia Kussman; Emily Fox Dunn; Asha Patnaik
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2009-11-23       Impact factor: 2.486

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.