| Literature DB >> 24450583 |
Ajaya K Biswal, Kazuo Soeno, Madhavi Latha Gandla, Peter Immerzeel, Sivakumar Pattathil, Jessica Lucenius, Ritva Serimaa, Michael G Hahn, Thomas Moritz, Leif J Jönsson, Maria Israelsson-Nordström, Ewa J Mellerowicz1.
Abstract
<span class="abstract_title">BACKGROUND: Wood cell walls are rich in <ass="Chemical">span class="Chemical">cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin. Hence, they are important sources of renewable biomass for producing energy and green chemicals. However, extracting desired constituents from wood efficiently poses significant challenges because these polymers are highly cross-linked in cell walls and are not easily accessible to enzymes and chemicals.Entities:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24450583 PMCID: PMC3909318 DOI: 10.1186/1754-6834-7-11
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biotechnol Biofuels ISSN: 1754-6834 Impact factor: 6.040
Figure 1Structural features of PL1-27. (A) Structure of mRNA [GenBank: EU379971.1]. Cds, coding sequence; nt, nucleotides. (B) Structure of the deduced peptide showing the signal peptide (SP), the pectate lyase C catalytic domain, and the predicted N-glycosylation site (N). AA, amino acids. (C) A multiple alignment of the catalytic site of PtxtPL1-27 and pectate lyases of known enzymatic activities, showing the conserved residues involved in Ca+2 binding (pink), disulfide bonds (orange), catalysis (blue), and substrate binding (gray) with numbering according to Pel C structure as in [16]. ZePel, Zinnia elegans pectate lyase; MaPel1, Musa acuminata pectate lyase 1; Pel C, Erwinia chrysanthemi pectate lyase C.
Figure 2Phylogenetic tree of pectate lyases in , , and other plants. The tree was constructed by the neighbor-joining method using MEGA5. The Populus gene numbering is consistent with [12] and family designation (I-V) is consistent with [10]. The optimal tree with the sum of branch length = 5.9 is shown. The percentage of replicate trees in which the associated taxa clustered together in the bootstrap test (1,000 replicates) are shown next to the branches. Cryj1, Cryptomeria japonica pectate lyase [GenBank: BAA05542]; GhPel, Gossypium hirsutum pectate lyase [GenBank: ADB90478]; MaPel1, Musa acuminata pectate lyase 1 [GenBank: AAF19195]; ZePel, Zinnia elegans pectate lyase [GenBank: Y09541].
Figure 3PEL activity of PL1-27 expressed in . PEL activity was measured as the formation of unsaturated uronides. Effect of pH (A) and Ca2+ ions (B). Means of five replicates ± standard error. Vector denotes the proteins extracted from the bacteria expressing the vector without PtxtPL1-27. EDTA, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid.
Figure 4PL1-27 expression analysis in aspen. (A) Real time RT-PCR analysis of PtxtPL1-27 expression in different tissues and organs of hybrid aspen indicates the highest expression of this gene in developing xylem and organs containing this tissue. Data shown are means of two biological replicates ± standard error. (B) Expression of PtxtPL1-27 in different wood development zones isolated by tangential sectioning. The same amount of total RNA from each zone was blotted onto a membrane and hybridized with a radiolabeled probe corresponding to PtxtPL1-27 cDNA. Phl, phloem; a, vascular cambium; b, expansion zone; c, transition zone; d, secondary wall formation zone; e, cell death zone.
Figure 5Overexpression of PL1-27 in developing wood of aspen. Relative PtxtPL1-27 transcript level determined by RT-qPCR and calibrated to 18S RNA (A) and PEL activity in wall-bound and soluble protein fractions (B, C) in developing xylem in the most highly expressing independent transgenic lines carrying 35S: PtxtPL1-27 (1051, 1002) and wild-type (WT). Means of two experiments, each with three biological replicates. WT1 and WT2 represent two sets of randomly selected WT trees. Bars represent standard error.
Lignin, hydrolyzable sugar anhydrate content and crystalline cellulose content of aspen wood
| Klason lignin | 17.1 ± 0.3 | ||
| Acid soluble lignin | 2.1 ± 0.0 | 2.1 ± 0.0 | 2.0 ± 0.1 |
| Cellulose | 364 ± 28 | 346 ± 62 | 363 ± 28 |
| Rha | 11.7 ± 1.2 | 9.2 ± 0.6 | 9.0 ± 1.2 |
| Ara | 5.6 ± 0.1 | 6.8 ± 0.4 | 6.1 ± 0.5 |
| Xyl | 312.4 ± 5.7 | 304.1 ± 6.4 | 317.8 ± 2.1 |
| Man | 18.8 ± 0.6 | ||
| Gal | 11.5 ± 0.9 | 13.3 ± 0.5 | 13.1 ± 1.0 |
| Glc | 187.2 ± 2.3 | 191.9 ± 4.8 | |
| Total sugar | 540.4 ± 7.4 | 539.4 ± 5.3 | 554.1 ± 6.8 |
| Uronic acids | 31.8 ± 2.4 | 30.4 ± 2.0 | 27.9 ± 1.5 |
Lignin content is expressed in % (w/w). Sugar content is expressed in μg/mg of wood de-starched alcohol-insoluble residue (AIR). Means ± standard error, n = 10 or 2 biological replicates for lignin and sugars, respectively.
1Averages for the transgenic lines in bold are significantly different from wild-type (WT) (post analysis-of-variance (ANOVA) t-test). Averages for WT in bold are significantly different from both transgenic lines taken together (post-ANOVA contrast). *P ≤10%; **P ≤5%.
Figure 6Overexpression of affects extractability of acidic polymers from wood. Wood alcohol-insoluble residues (AIRs) were sequentially extracted with water, 1,2-cyclohexylenedinitrilotetraacetic acid (CDTA) 1 M potassium hydroxide (KOH) and 4 M KOH, and the amounts of uronic acids extracted by each solvent and remaining in the pellet was determined by the biphenyl assay and expressed per weight of extracted cell wall material. Data are means of three biological replicates and standard error. Probability refers to the post analysis-of-variance analysis by contrast between transgenic lines and wild-type (WT).
Figure 7Overexpression of affects extractability of many polymers of wood. Sequential cell wall extracts, obtained using α-amylase, endo-polygalacturonase (EPG)/ pectin methylesterase (PME), sodium carbonate, 1 M potassium hydroxide (KOH) and 4 M KOH, were probed with a panel of 150 monoclonal antibodies (A-C) and analyzed for the monosaccharide composition (D). (A-C) Extracts were screened against an array of plant glycan-directed monoclonal antibodies using ELISA. (A) Antibody binding (average of two biological replicates) is depicted as colored heat maps; bright yellow, maximal binding; black, no binding. The colored panel (right) depicts groups of antibodies used, identified according to polysaccharides predominantly recognized by each group [26] (list of antibodies provided in Additional file 5). Colored boxes indicate regions of the glycome profiles that were altered in both transgenic lines (blue boxes) or predominantly in one line (orange boxes) compared to wild-type (WT). (B) Signals ≥0.1 from pectin- and arabinogalactan (AG)-directed antibodies recognizing epitopes in α-amylase and EPG/PME extracts. (C) Signals ≥0.1 from an expanded set of xylan-directed antibodies specifically recognizing epitopes in aspen wood hemicelluloses in 1 M KOH and 4 M KOH extracts. (D) Monosaccharide composition of sequential extracts. Only monosaccharides that differed in content in extracts between PtxtPL1-27 overexpressing lines and the WT are presented (full dataset in Additional file 6). Data in B-D are means of two biological replicates ± standard error. Asterisks indicate probability for significance of difference between transgenic lines and WT (post analysis-of-variance contrast: *P ≤10%, **P ≤5%, ***P ≤1%, ****P ≤0.1%).
Figure 8Overexpression of PL1-27 increases sugar yields from saccharification. Sugar yields after 72 h of saccharification without pretreatment (A), after acid pretreatment (B), and after 72 h saccharification following acid pretreatment (C). Means of five biological replicates ± standard error. Percentage differences are shown for individual lines significantly differing from wild-type (WT) (post analysis-of-variance (ANOVA) t-test), and average differences for both transgenic lines when significantly different from WT (post ANOVA contrast between transgenic lines and WT) *P ≤10%, **P ≤5%, ***P ≤1%.
Total sugar yields for transgenic aspen lines and wild-type after acidic pretreatment
| 0.390 ± 0.01 (100%)** | 0.126 ± 0.01 (100%)*** | 0.517 ± 0.01 (100%)*** | |
| 0.421 ± 0.01 (108%)** | 0.144 ± 0.01 (114%)** | 0.565 ± 0.01 (109%)** | |
| 0.418 ± 0.03 (107%) | 0.157 ± 0.01 (124%)** | 0.574 ± 0.01 (111%)** | |
The % values represent the sugar yield in comparison with wild-type (WT). Means ± standard error, n = 5 biological replicates. aYield of hexoses (g of Gal, Glc, and Man) per g of wood after pretreatment and after 72 h of enzymatic hydrolysis. bYield of pentoses (g of Ara and Xyl) per g of wood after pretreatment and after 72 h of enzymatic hydrolysis. cYield of monosaccharides (g of Ara, Gal, Glc, Man and Xyl) per g of wood after pretreatment and after 72 h of enzymatic hydrolysis. Asterisks (by means for individual lines) indicate yields significantly different from WT when analyzed by post analysis-of-variance (ANOVA) t-test or means (for WT) that were significantly different from both lines by post ANOVA contrast. **P ≤5%, ***P ≤1%.
Cellulose crystallite structure in transgenic lines and wild-type determined by x-ray diffraction
| Wild-type | 28.7 ± 1.5 | 29.9 ± 0.1 |
| 1051 | 29.4 ± 1.8 | 30.0 ± 0.2 |
| 1002 | 30.7 ± 1.7 | 30.2 ± 0.1 |
Means ± standard error, n = 5 to 8 biological replicates. Å – ångström.