Literature DB >> 24450050

Osteopathology in the feet of rhinoceroses: lesion type and distribution.

Sophie Regnault1, Robert Hermes2, Thomas Hildebrandt2, John Hutchinson3, Renate Weller3.   

Abstract

An estimated 1,170 white (Ceratotherium simum), black (Diceros bicornis), greater one-horned (Rhinoceros unicornis), and Sumatran (Dicerorhinus sumatrensis) rhinoceroses are kept in captivity worldwide, where they are a popular public attraction and serve important roles in education and conservation. Rhinoceroses in captivity are reportedly affected by a variety of foot conditions, including abscesses, nail cracking, and pododermatitis, but there are few studies reporting associated bony pathology in these species. This study aimed to describe osteopathology in rhinoceros feet and identify normal and abnormal osteologic features of rhinoceros feet. The metacarpal-tarsal and phalangeal bones from 81 feet (67 skeletal specimens and 14 cadaveric feet), derived from 27 rhinoceroses of various species, were evaluated in the study (1 black, 11 white, 2 greater one-horned, 3 Javan, 9 Sumatran, and 1 unknown). Bones were examined visually (skeletal specimens) or by computed tomography (cadaver specimens) for evidence of bony lesions. Of the 27 rhinoceroses examined, 22 showed some degree of bone pathology in at least one limb. Six broad categories of pathologic change were identified, with numbers in parentheses representing numbers of rhinoceroses with lesions in at least one limb/number of rhinoceroses examined: enthesopathy (20/27), osteoarthritis (15/27), pathologic bone remodeling (12/27), osteitis-osteomyelitis (3/27), fracture (3/8), and subluxation (3/8). The frequency of pathologic changes in fore- and hind limbs was not significantly different. Most (91%) enthesopathies were observed on the proximal phalanges of the digits, and osteoarthritis was most common in the distal interphalangeal joints of the medial and lateral digits (32 and 26%, respectively). In addition to the pathology described, all examined rhinoceroses also had multiple small surface lucencies in the distal limb bones as an apparently normal anatomic feature. This study is an important first step in identifying both normal and pathologic features of rhinoceros feet and hopefully will thereby contribute to the improved knowledge and care of these species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24450050     DOI: 10.1638/2012-0277R1.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Zoo Wildl Med        ISSN: 1042-7260            Impact factor:   0.776


  5 in total

1.  Can skeletal surface area predict in vivo foot surface area?

Authors:  E Catherine Strickson; John R Hutchinson; David M Wilkinson; Peter L Falkingham
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  A first glimpse at the influence of body mass in the morphological integration of the limb long bones: an investigation in modern rhinoceroses.

Authors:  Christophe Mallet; Guillaume Billet; Alexandra Houssaye; Raphaël Cornette
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 2.921

3.  Skeletal pathology and variable anatomy in elephant feet assessed using computed tomography.

Authors:  Sophie Regnault; Jonathon J I Dixon; Chris Warren-Smith; John R Hutchinson; Renate Weller
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  Interspecific variation in the limb long bones among modern rhinoceroses-extent and drivers.

Authors:  Christophe Mallet; Raphaël Cornette; Guillaume Billet; Alexandra Houssaye
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 2.984

5.  Osteopathology in Rhinocerotidae from 50 Million Years to the Present.

Authors:  Kelsey T Stilson; Samantha S B Hopkins; Edward Byrd Davis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.