Literature DB >> 26840633

Osteopathology in Rhinocerotidae from 50 Million Years to the Present.

Kelsey T Stilson1, Samantha S B Hopkins2,3, Edward Byrd Davis2,4.   

Abstract

Individual elements of many extinct and extant North American rhinocerotids display osteopathologies, particularly exostoses, abnormal textures, and joint margin porosity, that are commonly associated with localized bone trauma. When we evaluated six extinct rhinocerotid species spanning 50 million years (Ma), we found the incidence of osteopathology increases from 28% of all elements of Eocene Hyrachyus eximius to 65-80% of all elements in more derived species. The only extant species in this study, Diceros bicornis, displayed less osteopathologies (50%) than the more derived extinct taxa. To get a finer-grained picture, we scored each fossil for seven pathological indicators on a scale of 1-4. We estimated the average mass of each taxon using M1-3 length and compared mass to average pathological score for each category. We found that with increasing mass, osteopathology also significantly increases. We then ran a phylogenetically-controlled regression analysis using a time-calibrated phylogeny of our study taxa. Mass estimates were found to significantly covary with abnormal foramen shape and abnormal bone textures. This pattern in osteopathological expression may reflect a part of the complex system of adaptations in the Rhinocerotidae over millions of years, where increased mass, cursoriality, and/or increased life span are selected for, to the detriment of long-term bone health. This work has important implications for the future health of hoofed animals and humans alike.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26840633      PMCID: PMC4739690          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146221

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Rhinos diverged from their closest living relative, the tapir, about 50.3 million years ago (Ma) [1,2,3] and quickly increased in abundance and species richness through the mid-Cenozoic. The rhinocerotid lineage is hypothesized to have diversified into four major clades in North America and Eurasia: the Diceratheriinae in the Oligocene, and the Aceratheriinae, Teleoceratinae, and Rhinocerotinae in the Miocene [4, 5]. Cursoriality, or the habit of running, has been hypothesized to have been maintained through the majority of these lineages [5,6]. These grazing and browsing lineages were some of the most numerous and widespread large mammals in the mid-Cenozoic, with frequent periods of migration between North America, Eurasia, and Africa [7, 8, 9]. About five million years ago the last North American genus, Teleoceras, disappeared from the fossil record [5]. North American rhino populations are estimated to have been smaller in size and weight than their Eurasian relatives [10], but both continents record taxa with increasingly robust and graviportal skeletons over time [5,11]. There are five extant species of rhino, all within the Rhinocerotinae. Two species are in Africa and three in Asia. As with many Animalia, a certain percentage of extinct and extant taxa show evidence of bony and soft-tissue pathologies [12, 13,14], with a recent increase in studies of pathologies in captive modern populations and individuals as wild numbers decline. For Rhinocerotidae, the great majority of studies are reports on captive rhinos with foot disorders [4,12,15,16], discovered during surgery or necropsy. For example, a recent study examined 27 modern captive individuals and a subset were scanned using computed tomography [13]. They found the majority displayed osteoarthritis and/or enthesopathy, particularly in the feet, and hypothesized that increased stress or strain, nutritional imbalance, habitat, and/or ascending infection could contribute the observed pathologies. A similar study [14] noted a wide range of osteopathologies in Ceratotherium simum and Rhinoceros unicornis using computed tomography and hypothesized that care, the weight of the animal, nutrition, or age could all contribute to pathological expression [14]. Extinct taxa have also displayed arthritis-like features, the most prominent being an increase in the frequency of spondylarthropathy (inflammatory arthritis, indicated by abnormal joint erosion or bone fusion) from around 10% in Oligocene Equidae and Rhinocerotidae to around 30% in the Holocene [17]. The common thread from these studies is the type of pathology recorded. These pathologies could all be grouped not as sudden traumatic events but, like runner’s knee or tennis elbow, growth or destruction of bone in response to increased physical stress over the lifetime of an individual. Bone growth in mammals is promoted by a combination of mechanical (low level stress) and hormone stimulation [18]. After primary growth and development of a mammal is complete, bone repair and remodeling responds primarily to local stimulation [16,18,19] caused by mechanical load. Local osteocytes (bone cells) respond to bone damage and wear with cell hyperplasia (increased cell growth or proliferation). Extensive cellular damage, localized biomechanics (e.g. joint loading, genetic predisposition, and the environment are all potential causal factors of bone degeneration, inflammation and infection in the bone or surrounding tissue [12, 16, 20]. Thus, continuous remodeling of bone can result in bone morphologies and pathologies that reflect what happened to the bone when it was part of a living organism. Increased mechanical load increases the likelihood of arthropathies such as proliferative joint diseases, erosive joint diseases, synovitis, and traumatic injury [16]. We will briefly examine the major arthropathies, but emphasize that the goal of this paper is not to diagnose the Rhinocerotidae lineage with a specific disease, but record and examine the osteopathologies that are possibly the result of these or related diseases. Four indicators of osteoarthritis (i.e. proliferative joint disease) commonly used in anthropologic studies are: eburnation, a wearing away of the bony articular surface, marginal osteophytes (known as lipping), sclerotic lesions or pitting on the articular surfaces, and alteration in the shape of the joint [21,22]. There are many other erosive arthropathies, but the most characteristic is rheumatoid arthritis (RA). RA includes symmetrical erosions of the hands and feet, minimal new bone formation, erosions, and osteoporosis [16]. Synovitis includes cortical erosion and irregular cysting [16]. Cysting, and ankyloses, or the fusion of a joint [16, 22] may also result from increased mechanical load. Other pathologies related to mechanical stress include inflammation of the periosteum, which can form exostoses. Traumatic breaking and healing of the bone may occur, in conjunction with chronic arthropathies. We initially expected to see a correlation between the severity of pathological expression and an increase in rhino mass and cursorial habits, because of the known correlation between osteopathology and mechanical stress [16, 18, 20, 21, 22], as well as previous observations of pathologies in rhinos [4, 13,14,15]. We reasoned that an increase in mass would put greater stress on bones and joints, increasing the likelihood that arthritis-like pathologies, such as osteophyte formation and articular surface degradation, would occur. If this were the case, the tendency to develop stress-related osteopathologies would be trackable and predictable. We asked two overarching questions in this study: (1) Do these osteopathologic features exhibit a trend over time? And (2) what is the relationship between mass and osteopathology?

Materials and Methods

To determine the relationship between mass and osteopathology through time, we collected data on osteopathologies from a number of extinct and extant taxa in the family Rhinocerotidae, Table 1, and an outgroup, Hyrachyus eximius, a perissodactyl sister group to the Rhinocerotidae [8, 23]. We collected data from localities with a large number of rhino skeletal elements to avoid individual preservation bias as much as possible, forming a series of species-level “snapshots” of the rhino lineage. Fossil species were chosen to span the temporal range of rhinocerotids and for the presence of adequate samples of identified elements, Table 2. Data resolution is not on the order of populations, but species in formations; this lumping of occurrences allows us to achieve a statistically adequate sample. For example, there are 15 different localities that comprise the Hyrachyus eximius sample, but they are all part of the Bridger Formation within Uinta County, Wyoming. No permits were required for the described study, which complied with all relevant regulations.
Table 1

Summary of species in this study.

NameAge Range (MA)Mass (kg)NISPMNIFormation
Hyrachyus eximius50.5–46.236.3275116Bridger
Trigonias osborni37.2–33.967711534White River
Menoceras arikarense24.8–20.43758361Harrison
Diceratherium niobrarense33.3–30.810107226John Day
Aphelops mutilis10.3–4.9184011053Ogalla Group
Teleoceras hicksi10.3–4.916606529Shutler/ Mascall/ Rattlesnake
Diceros bicornis01080754——

Summary of species in this study and related age ranges, mass, number of identified specimens (NISP), minimum number of individuals (MNI), and the geological formation the fossils are associated with. Data compiled from Fortelius and Kappelman [24], Cerdeño [8, 10], Prothero [5], Mendoza [25], and Owen-Smith [26]. Mass Estimate M1-3 Length from Radinsky 1967 [23] for H. eximius and Prothero [5] for the rest.

Table 2

Numbers and Localities of all Specimens Used in This Study.

PrefixSpecimen Num.GenusSpecieselementNISPLocality NameFormationAge
AMNH1645Hyrachyuseximiuspelvis1Twin ButtesBridgerBridgerian
AMNH11652Hyrachyuseximiuspelvis3Little Dry Cr'kBridgerBridgerian
AMNH12364Hyrachyuseximiuspelvis230 ft. above upper white stratusBridgerBridgerian
AMNH1621Hyrachyuseximiusfemur1Bridger BasinBridgerBridgerian
AMNH1621Hyrachyuseximiustibia1Bridger BasinBridgerBridgerian
AMNH1623Hyrachyuseximiusradius1Bridger BasinBridgerBridgerian
AMNH1638Hyrachyuseximiusradius1Cottonwood CorralBridgerBridgerian
AMNH1638Hyrachyuseximiusulna1Cottonwood CorralBridgerBridgerian
AMNH1640Hyrachyuseximiusfemur1Bridger BasinBridgerBridgerian
AMNH1640Hyrachyuseximiusradius1Bridger BasinBridgerBridgerian
AMNH1641Hyrachyuseximiusfemur1Bridger BasinBridgerBridgerian
AMNH1644Hyrachyuseximiustibia1Bridger BasinBridgerBridgerian
AMNH1645Hyrachyuseximiustibia1Twin ButtesBridgerBridgerian
AMNH1646Hyrachyuseximiushumerus1Twin ButtesBridgerBridgerian
AMNH1646Hyrachyuseximiusradius (juvenile)1Twin ButtesBridgerBridgerian
AMNH1646Hyrachyuseximiustibia1Twin ButtesBridgerBridgerian
AMNH1646Hyrachyuseximiusulna1Twin ButtesBridgerBridgerian
AMNH1903Hyrachyuseximiusulna1Henry's Fork LTBridgerBridgerian
AMNH11693Hyrachyuseximiusfemur head1BridgerBridgerBridgerian
AMNH11693Hyrachyuseximiusradius—broken into two parts1BridgerBridgerBridgerian
AMNH11693Hyrachyuseximiustibia1BridgerBridgerBridgerian
AMNH11707Hyrachyuseximiusfemur1Henry's Fork LTBridgerBridgerian
AMNH11712Hyrachyuseximiusfemur1Cat-tail SpringBridgerBridgerian
AMNH11712Hyrachyuseximiustibia1Church ButtesBridgerBridgerian
AMNH12179Hyrachyuseximiusfemur1BridgerBridgerBridgerian
AMNH12179Hyrachyuseximiustibia- lower1BridgerBridgerBridgerian
AMNH12179Hyrachyuseximiustibia- upper1BridgerBridgerBridgerian
AMNH12225Hyrachyuseximiushumerus1Summer's Dry Cr'kBridgerBridgerian
AMNH12225Hyrachyuseximiusradius1Summer's Dry Cr'kBridgerBridgerian
AMNH12225Hyrachyuseximiusulna1Summer's Dry Cr'kBridgerBridgerian
AMNH12356Hyrachyuseximiusradius, ulna, distal humerus (articulated)1Mouth of Summer's Dry CreekBridgerBridgerian
AMNH12364Hyrachyuseximiusdistal tibia1Henry's ForkBridgerBridgerian
AMNH12364Hyrachyuseximiusfemur1Henry's ForkBridgerBridgerian
AMNH12364Hyrachyuseximiusfibula1Henry's ForkBridgerBridgerian
AMNH12364Hyrachyuseximiustibia1Henry's ForkBridgerBridgerian
AMNH12665Hyrachyuseximiusfemur1Grizzly ButtesBridgerBridgerian
AMNH12665Hyrachyuseximiustibia1Grizzly ButtesBridgerBridgerian
AMNH12673Hyrachyuseximiusradius1Henry's Fork LTBridgerBridgerian
AMNH12673Hyrachyuseximiusulna1Henry's Fork LTBridgerBridgerian
AMNH12675Hyrachyuseximiusfemur1Black's Fork above MillersvilleBridgerBridgerian
AMNH12675Hyrachyuseximiusfemur1Black's Fork above MillersvilleBridgerBridgerian
AMNH12675Hyrachyuseximiusfibula1Black's Fork above MillersvilleBridgerBridgerian
AMNH12675Hyrachyuseximiustibia1Black's Fork above MillersvilleBridgerBridgerian
AMNH93050Hyrachyuseximiusfemur1Henry's Fork LTBridgerBridgerian
AMNH93050Hyrachyuseximiusradius1Henry's Fork LTBridgerBridgerian
AMNH93050Hyrachyuseximiusulna1Henry's Fork LTBridgerBridgerian
AMNH93052Hyrachyuseximiusfemur1Grizzly ButtesBridgerBridgerian
AMNH93058Hyrachyuseximiustibia1Grizzly ButtesBridgerBridgerian
AMNH93059Hyrachyuseximiustibia1Henry's Fork LTBridgerBridgerian
AMNH93060Hyrachyuseximiusfemur1Bridger BasinBridgerBridgerian
AMNH93064Hyrachyuseximiusfemur1Henry's Fork LTBridgerBridgerian
AMNH93065Hyrachyuseximiustibia1Grizzly ButtesBridgerBridgerian
AMNH93066Hyrachyuseximiustibia1BridgerBridgerBridgerian
AMNH1644-AHyrachyuseximiusfemur1Bridger BasinBridgerBridgerian
AMNH5065-AHyrachyuseximiushumerus1Bridger BasinBridgerBridgerian
AMNH5065-AHyrachyuseximiusulna1Bridger BasinBridgerBridgerian
AMNH1602Hyrachyuseximiusmetapodial8Bridger BasinBridgerBridgerian
AMNH1607Hyrachyuseximiusmetapodial1BridgerBridgerBridgerian
AMNH1615Hyrachyuseximiusmetapodial1Bridger BasinBridgerBridgerian
AMNH1621Hyrachyuseximiusmetapodial1Bridger BasinBridgerBridgerian
AMNH1629Hyrachyuseximiusmetapodial5Bridger BasinBridgerBridgerian
AMNH1645Hyrachyuseximiusmetapodial3Twin ButtesBridgerBridgerian
AMNH5181Hyrachyuseximiusmetapodial3Bridger BasinBridgerBridgerian
AMNH11693Hyrachyuseximiusmetapodial8BridgerBridgerBridgerian
AMNH12353Hyrachyuseximiusmetapodial3Cat-tail SpringBridgerBridgerian
AMNH12368Hyrachyuseximiusmetapodial3Henry's Fork LTBridgerBridgerian
AMNH12665Hyrachyuseximiusmetapodial3Grizzly ButtesBridgerBridgerian
AMNH12673Hyrachyuseximiusmetapodial5Henry's Fork LTBridgerBridgerian
AMNH12674Hyrachyuseximiusmetapodial2BridgerBridgerBridgerian
AMNH12675Hyrachyuseximiusmetapodial5Kinney RanchBridgerBridgerian
AMNH12765Hyrachyuseximiusmetapodial3Black's Fork above MillersvilleBridgerBridgerian
AMNH93050Hyrachyuseximiusmetapodial1Henry's Fork LTBridgerBridgerian
AMNH93060Hyrachyuseximiusmetapodial1BridgerBridgerBridgerian
AMNH93061Hyrachyuseximiusmetapodial4Grizzly Buttes EastBridgerBridgerian
AMNH93064Hyrachyuseximiusmetapodial1Henry's Fork LTBridgerBridgerian
AMNH105435Hyrachyuseximiusmetapodial1Tabernacle ButteBridgerBridgerian
AMNH1644-AHyrachyuseximiusmetapodial2Bridger BasinBridgerBridgerian
AMNH1602Hyrachyuseximiusphalanx3Bridger BasinBridgerBridgerian
AMNH1626Hyrachyuseximiusphalanx1Bridger BasinBridgerBridgerian
AMNH1635Hyrachyuseximiusphalanx1Bridger BasinBridgerBridgerian
AMNH11693Hyrachyuseximiusphalanx11BridgerBridgerBridgerian
AMNH12353Hyrachyuseximiusphalanx4Cat-tail SpringBridgerBridgerian
AMNH12673Hyrachyuseximiusphalanx6Henry's Fork LTBridgerBridgerian
AMNH12675Hyrachyuseximiusphalanx1Black's Fork above MillersvilleBridgerBridgerian
AMNH93064Hyrachyuseximiusphalanx4Henry's Fork LTBridgerBridgerian
AMNH1644-AHyrachyuseximiusphalanx4Bridger BasinBridgerBridgerian
AMNH1602Hyrachyuseximiusastragalus1Bridger BasinBridgerBridgerian
AMNH1607Hyrachyuseximiusastragalus1BridgerBridgerBridgerian
AMNH1607Hyrachyuseximiuspodial1BridgerBridgerBridgerian
AMNH1615Hyrachyuseximiusastragalus2Bridger BasinBridgerBridgerian
AMNH1615Hyrachyuseximiuscalcaneum1Bridger BasinBridgerBridgerian
AMNH1615Hyrachyuseximiuspodial2Bridger BasinBridgerBridgerian
AMNH1621Hyrachyuseximiuscalcaneum1Bridger BasinBridgerBridgerian
AMNH1626Hyrachyuseximiuspodial2Bridger BasinBridgerBridgerian
AMNH1629Hyrachyuseximiuspodial1Bridger BasinBridgerBridgerian
AMNH1635Hyrachyuseximiusastragalus2Bridger BasinBridgerBridgerian
AMNH1644Hyrachyuseximiuscalcaneum2Bridger BasinBridgerBridgerian
AMNH1644Hyrachyuseximiuspodial2Bridger BasinBridgerBridgerian
AMNH1645Hyrachyuseximiusastragalus1Twin ButtesBridgerBridgerian
AMNH1645Hyrachyuseximiuscalcaneum1Twin ButtesBridgerBridgerian
AMNH1645Hyrachyuseximiuspodial2Twin ButtesBridgerBridgerian
AMNH5056Hyrachyuseximiusastragalus1Grizzly ButtesBridgerBridgerian
AMNH5056Hyrachyuseximiuscalcaneum1Grizzly ButtesBridgerBridgerian
AMNH5056Hyrachyuseximiusnavicular1Grizzly ButtesBridgerBridgerian
AMNH5056Hyrachyuseximiuspodial3Grizzly ButtesBridgerBridgerian
AMNH5181Hyrachyuseximiusmagnum1Bridger BasinBridgerBridgerian
AMNH5196Hyrachyuseximiusastragalus1Bridger BasinBridgerBridgerian
AMNH5196Hyrachyuseximiuscalcaneum1Bridger BasinBridgerBridgerian
AMNH11693Hyrachyuseximiuspodial9BridgerBridgerBridgerian
AMNH11712Hyrachyuseximiusastragalus2Church ButtesBridgerBridgerian
AMNH11712Hyrachyuseximiuscalcaneum1Church ButtesBridgerBridgerian
AMNH12179Hyrachyuseximiusastragalus1Mid. Cottonwood Cr.BridgerBridgerian
AMNH12179Hyrachyuseximiuscalcaneum1Mid. Cottonwood Cr.BridgerBridgerian
AMNH12225Hyrachyuseximiuspodial1Summer's Dry Cr'kBridgerBridgerian
AMNH12353Hyrachyuseximiuscalcaneum1Cat-tail SpringBridgerBridgerian
AMNH12353Hyrachyuseximiuspodial6Cat-tail SpringBridgerBridgerian
AMNH12353Hyrachyuseximiussesimoid3Cat-tail SpringBridgerBridgerian
AMNH12368Hyrachyuseximiuspodial11Henry's Fork LTBridgerBridgerian
AMNH12665Hyrachyuseximiusastragalus2Grizzly ButtesBridgerBridgerian
AMNH12665Hyrachyuseximiuscalcaneum1Grizzly ButtesBridgerBridgerian
AMNH12665Hyrachyuseximiuspodial6Grizzly ButtesBridgerBridgerian
AMNH12673Hyrachyuseximiuscalcaneum1Henry's Fork LTBridgerBridgerian
AMNH12673Hyrachyuseximiuspodial10Henry's Fork LTBridgerBridgerian
AMNH12674Hyrachyuseximiusastragalus1BridgerBridgerBridgerian
AMNH12674Hyrachyuseximiuscalcaneum1BridgerBridgerBridgerian
AMNH12674Hyrachyuseximiuspodial6BridgerBridgerBridgerian
AMNH12675Hyrachyuseximiuscalcaneum1Kinney RanchBridgerBridgerian
AMNH93050Hyrachyuseximiuspodial1Henry's Fork LTBridgerBridgerian
AMNH93061Hyrachyuseximiuscalcaneum1Grizzly Buttes EastBridgerBridgerian
AMNH93061Hyrachyuseximiuscalcaneum partial1Grizzly Buttes EastBridgerBridgerian
AMNH93061Hyrachyuseximiuscuboid1Grizzly Buttes EastBridgerBridgerian
AMNH93064Hyrachyuseximiusastragalus, calcaneum, and podial (articulated)1Henry's Fork LTBridgerBridgerian
AMNH93064Hyrachyuseximiuspodial1Henry's Fork LTBridgerBridgerian
AMNH98726Hyrachyuseximiuspisiform1S. Hyopsodus Hill, Tabernacle ButteBridgerBridgerian
AMNH105435Hyrachyuseximiusastragalus1Tabernacle ButteBridgerBridgerian
AMNH12665-AHyrachyuseximiusastragalus1Grizzly ButtesBridgerBridgerian
AMNH12665-AHyrachyuseximiuscalcaneum1Grizzly ButtesBridgerBridgerian
AMNH1536-AHyrachyuseximiusastragalus1Bridger BasinBridgerBridgerian
AMNH1592-AHyrachyuseximiusastragalus1Bridger BasinBridgerBridgerian
AMNH1596-AHyrachyuseximiusastragalus1Bridger BasinBridgerBridgerian
AMNH1644-AHyrachyuseximiuscalcaneum1Bridger BasinBridgerBridgerian
AMNH1644-AHyrachyuseximiuspodial4Bridger BasinBridgerBridgerian
AMNH5065-BHyrachyuseximiuscalcaneum3Bridger BasinBridgerBridgerian
AMNH1602Hyrachyuseximiusaxis1Bridger BasinBridgerBridgerian
UCMP32011Trigoniasosbornileft femur1Figgins QuarryWhite RiverChadronian
UCMP32011Trigoniasosbornihumerus1Figgins QuarryWhite RiverChadronian
UCMP32011Trigoniasosbornileft humerus2Figgins QuarryWhite RiverChadronian
UCMP32011Trigoniasosbornileft radius1Figgins QuarryWhite RiverChadronian
UCMP32012Trigoniasosbornileft ulna1Figgins QuarryWhite RiverChadronian
UCMP32011Trigoniasosbornileft scapula2Figgins QuarryWhite RiverChadronian
UCMP32011Trigoniasosbornileft tibia2Figgins QuarryWhite RiverChadronian
UCMP32011Trigoniasosbornileft fibula1Figgins QuarryWhite RiverChadronian
UCMP32012Trigoniasosbornileft tibia1Figgins QuarryWhite RiverChadronian
UCMP32011Trigoniasosbornipatella1Figgins QuarryWhite RiverChadronian
UCMP32011Trigoniasosborniright tibiofibula1Figgins QuarryWhite RiverChadronian
UCMP32011Trigoniasosborniright ulna1Figgins QuarryWhite RiverChadronian
UCMP32012Trigoniasosborniright radius1Figgins QuarryWhite RiverChadronian
UCMP32011Trigoniasosborniright ulna1Figgins QuarryWhite RiverChadronian
UCMP32011Trigoniasosbornileft femur1Figgins QuarryWhite RiverChadronian
UCMP32011Trigoniasosbornipatellae1Figgins QuarryWhite RiverChadronian
UCMP32011Trigoniasosbornileft humerus1Figgins QuarryWhite RiverChadronian
UCMP32011Trigoniasosborniright humerus2Figgins QuarryWhite RiverChadronian
UCMP32011Trigoniasosbornimetapodial23Figgins QuarryWhite RiverChadronian
UCMP32011Trigoniasosbornimetatarsal1Figgins QuarryWhite RiverChadronian
UCMP32011Trigoniasosbornileft metatarsal2Figgins QuarryWhite RiverChadronian
UCMP32011Trigoniasosbornimetatarsal4Figgins QuarryWhite RiverChadronian
UCMP32011Trigoniasosbornimetapodial1Figgins QuarryWhite RiverChadronian
UCMP32011Trigoniasosborniphalanx33Figgins QuarryWhite RiverChadronian
UCMP32011Trigoniasosborniphalanx 31Figgins QuarryWhite RiverChadronian
UCMP32011Trigoniasosborniastragalus1Figgins QuarryWhite RiverChadronian
UCMP32011Trigoniasosbornicalcaneum2Figgins QuarryWhite RiverChadronian
UCMP32011Trigoniasosbornicuneiform8Figgins QuarryWhite RiverChadronian
UCMP32011Trigoniasosbornileft podial1Figgins QuarryWhite RiverChadronian
UCMP32011Trigoniasosbornicarpal1Figgins QuarryWhite RiverChadronian
UCMP32011Trigoniasosbornipodial1Figgins QuarryWhite RiverChadronian
UCMP32011Trigoniasosbornipisiform4Figgins QuarryWhite RiverChadronian
UCMP32011Trigoniasosbornipodial2Figgins QuarryWhite RiverChadronian
UCMP32011Trigoniasosborninavicular3Figgins QuarryWhite RiverChadronian
UCMP32011Trigoniasosbornileft pisiform1Figgins QuarryWhite RiverChadronian
UCMP32011Trigoniasosborniright pisiform1Figgins QuarryWhite RiverChadronian
AMNH144571Menocerasarikarensescapula1Agate Spring QuarryHarrisonArikareean
AMNH144572Menocerasarikarensescapula1Agate Spring QuarryHarrisonArikareean
AMNH144573Menocerasarikarensescapula1Agate Spring QuarryHarrisonArikareean
AMNH144574Menocerasarikarensescapula1Agate Spring QuarryHarrisonArikareean
AMNH144575Menocerasarikarensescapula1Agate Spring QuarryHarrisonArikareean
AMNH144576Menocerasarikarensescapula1Agate Spring QuarryHarrisonArikareean
AMNH144577Menocerasarikarensescapula1Agate Spring QuarryHarrisonArikareean
AMNH144578Menocerasarikarensescapula1Agate Spring QuarryHarrisonArikareean
AMNH144579Menocerasarikarensescapula1Agate Spring QuarryHarrisonArikareean
AMNH14213Menocerasarikarensehumerus1Agate Spring QuarryHarrisonArikareean
AMNH14213Menocerasarikarenseradius-ulna1Agate Spring QuarryHarrisonArikareean
AMNH14214Menocerasarikarensehumerus1Agate Spring QuarryHarrisonArikareean
AMNH14214Menocerasarikarenseproximal tibia1Agate Spring QuarryHarrisonArikareean
AMNH22486Menocerasarikarensefemur1Agate Spring QuarryHarrisonArikareean
AMNH22486Menocerasarikarensehumerus1Agate Spring QuarryHarrisonArikareean
AMNH22486Menocerasarikarenseradius1Agate Spring QuarryHarrisonArikareean
AMNH22487Menocerasarikarensefibula1Agate Spring QuarryHarrisonArikareean
AMNH22487Menocerasarikarensehumerus1Agate Spring QuarryHarrisonArikareean
AMNH22487Menocerasarikarenseulna1Agate Spring QuarryHarrisonArikareean
AMNH144597Menocerasarikarenseulna1Agate Spring QuarryHarrisonArikareean
AMNH144598Menocerasarikarenseulna1Agate Spring QuarryHarrisonArikareean
AMNH144599Menocerasarikarenseulna1Agate Spring QuarryHarrisonArikareean
AMNH144600Menocerasarikarenseulna1Agate Spring QuarryHarrisonArikareean
AMNH144602Menocerasarikarenseulna1Agate Spring QuarryHarrisonArikareean
AMNH144603Menocerasarikarenseulna1Agate Spring QuarryHarrisonArikareean
AMNH144604Menocerasarikarenseulna1Agate Spring QuarryHarrisonArikareean
AMNH144605Menocerasarikarenseulna1Agate Spring QuarryHarrisonArikareean
AMNH144606Menocerasarikarenseulna1Agate Spring QuarryHarrisonArikareean
AMNH144607Menocerasarikarenseulna1Agate Spring QuarryHarrisonArikareean
AMNH144608Menocerasarikarenseulna1Agate Spring QuarryHarrisonArikareean
AMNH144580Menocerasarikarensehumerus1Agate Spring QuarryHarrisonArikareean
AMNH144581Menocerasarikarensehumerus1Agate Spring QuarryHarrisonArikareean
AMNH144582Menocerasarikarensehumerus1Agate Spring QuarryHarrisonArikareean
AMNH144583Menocerasarikarensehumerus1Agate Spring QuarryHarrisonArikareean
AMNH144585Menocerasarikarensehumerus1Agate Spring QuarryHarrisonArikareean
AMNH144586Menocerasarikarensehumerus1Agate Spring QuarryHarrisonArikareean
AMNH144587Menocerasarikarensehumerus1Agate Spring QuarryHarrisonArikareean
AMNH144588Menocerasarikarensehumerus1Agate Spring QuarryHarrisonArikareean
AMNH144589Menocerasarikarensehumerus1Agate Spring QuarryHarrisonArikareean
AMNH144590Menocerasarikarensehumerus1Agate Spring QuarryHarrisonArikareean
AMNH144591Menocerasarikarensehumerus1Agate Spring QuarryHarrisonArikareean
AMNH144592Menocerasarikarensehumerus1Agate Spring QuarryHarrisonArikareean
AMNH144593Menocerasarikarensehumerus1Agate Spring QuarryHarrisonArikareean
AMNH144594Menocerasarikarensehumerus1Agate Spring QuarryHarrisonArikareean
AMNH144595Menocerasarikarensehumerus1Agate Spring QuarryHarrisonArikareean
AMNH144596Menocerasarikarensehumerus1Agate Spring QuarryHarrisonArikareean
AMNH144609Menocerasarikarenseradius1Agate Spring QuarryHarrisonArikareean
AMNH144610Menocerasarikarenseradius1Agate Spring QuarryHarrisonArikareean
AMNH144611Menocerasarikarenseradius1Agate Spring QuarryHarrisonArikareean
AMNH144612Menocerasarikarenseradius1Agate Spring QuarryHarrisonArikareean
AMNH144616Menocerasarikarenseradius1Agate Spring QuarryHarrisonArikareean
AMNH144613Menocerasarikarenseradius1Agate Spring QuarryHarrisonArikareean
AMNH144614Menocerasarikarenseradius1Agate Spring QuarryHarrisonArikareean
AMNH144615Menocerasarikarenseradius1Agate Spring QuarryHarrisonArikareean
AMNH144617Menocerasarikarenseradius1Agate Spring QuarryHarrisonArikareean
AMNH144618Menocerasarikarenseradius1Agate Spring QuarryHarrisonArikareean
AMNH144619Menocerasarikarenseradius1Agate Spring QuarryHarrisonArikareean
AMNH144622Menocerasarikarenseradius1Agate Spring QuarryHarrisonArikareean
AMNH144621Menocerasarikarenseradius1Agate Spring QuarryHarrisonArikareean
AMNH144620Menocerasarikarenseradius1Agate Spring QuarryHarrisonArikareean
AMNH144623Menocerasarikarenseradius1Agate Spring QuarryHarrisonArikareean
AMNH144625Menocerasarikarenseradius1Agate Spring QuarryHarrisonArikareean
AMNH144624Menocerasarikarenseradius1Agate Spring QuarryHarrisonArikareean
AMNH144633Menocerasarikarensefemur1Agate Spring QuarryHarrisonArikareean
AMNH144634Menocerasarikarensefemur1Agate Spring QuarryHarrisonArikareean
AMNH144635Menocerasarikarensetibia1Agate Spring QuarryHarrisonArikareean
AMNH144636Menocerasarikarensefibula1Agate Spring QuarryHarrisonArikareean
AMNH144584Menocerasarikarensehumerus1Agate Spring QuarryHarrisonArikareean
AMNH86090Menocerasarikarensepartial metapodials1Agate Spring QuarryHarrisonArikareean
AMNH144626Menocerasarikarensemetapodial1Agate Spring QuarryHarrisonArikareean
AMNH144627Menocerasarikarensemetapodial1Agate Spring QuarryHarrisonArikareean
AMNH144628Menocerasarikarensemetapodial1Agate Spring QuarryHarrisonArikareean
AMNH86090Menocerasarikarenseleft phalanx1Agate Spring QuarryHarrisonArikareean
AMNH86091Menocerasarikarenseright phalanx1Agate Spring QuarryHarrisonArikareean
AMNH86092Menocerasarikarensephalanx1Agate Spring QuarryHarrisonArikareean
AMNH144629Menocerasarikarensephalanx1Agate Spring QuarryHarrisonArikareean
AMNH144632Menocerasarikarensephalanx1Agate Spring QuarryHarrisonArikareean
AMNH144630Menocerasarikarensephalanx1Agate Spring QuarryHarrisonArikareean
AMNH144631Menocerasarikarensephalanx1Agate Spring QuarryHarrisonArikareean
AMNH86090Menocerasarikarenseastragalus1Agate Spring QuarryHarrisonArikareean
AMNH86090Menocerasarikarensecalcaneum1Agate Spring QuarryHarrisonArikareean
AMNH86090Menocerasarikarensepodial2Agate Spring QuarryHarrisonArikareean
UW52334Diceratheriumniobrarensescapula1John Day FormationJohn Day FormationWhitneyan
UW58203Diceratheriumniobrarensescapula1south canyonJohn Day FormationWhitneyan
UCMP2289Diceratheriumniobrarensepelvis frag1Logan ButteJohn Day FormationWhitneyan
UW26414Diceratheriumniobrarensepatella1Blue BasinJohn Day FormationWhitneyan
UW26536Diceratheriumniobrarensedistal femur1John Day FormationJohn Day FormationWhitneyan
UW28151Diceratheriumniobrarensefemoral head1John Day FormationJohn Day FormationWhitneyan
UW52334Diceratheriumniobrarensedistal femur1John Day FormationJohn Day FormationWhitneyan
UW53301Diceratheriumniobrarensetibia1picture gorge 14John Day FormationWhitneyan
UW53302Diceratheriumniobrarenseproximal tibia1picture gorge 51John Day FormationWhitneyan
UW53323Diceratheriumniobrarensetibia (juvenile)1picture gorge 54John Day FormationWhitneyan
UW53324Diceratheriumniobrarensefemur (juvenile)1picture gorge 54John Day FormationWhitneyan
UW53325Diceratheriumniobrarensedistal femur1picture gorge 20John Day FormationWhitneyan
UW53430Diceratheriumniobrarensedistal femur1picture gorge 54John Day FormationWhitneyan
UW55086Diceratheriumniobrarensetibia1North Wash Level 5John Day FormationWhitneyan
UW58755Diceratheriumniobrarensetibia1Blue CanyonJohn Day FormationWhitneyan
UW58755Diceratheriumniobrarenselimb bone2Blue CanyonJohn Day FormationWhitneyan
UW533315Diceratheriumniobrarensehumerus1picture gorge 12John Day FormationWhitneyan
UCMP145Diceratheriumniobrarensedistal femur and podial1John Day Whitneyan GeneralJohn Day FormationWhitneyan
UCMP566Diceratheriumniobrarenseproximal radioulna1John Day Whitneyan GeneralJohn Day FormationWhitneyan
UCMP75260Diceratheriumniobrarenseproximal humerus1South Canyon 2John Day FormationWhitneyain
UCMP75261Diceratheriumniobrarensedistal humerus1South Canyon 2John Day FormationWhitneyain
UCMP75261Diceratheriumniobrarenseproximal humerus1South Canyon 2John Day FormationWhitneyain
UCMP75282Diceratheriumniobrarensefemur1South Canyon 2John Day FormationWhitneyain
UCMPM1691Diceratheriumniobrarensedistal femur1Logan ButteJohn Day FormationWhitneyain
UCMPM1691Diceratheriumniobrarensepartial fibula1Logan ButteJohn Day FormationWhitneyain
UCMPM1691Diceratheriumniobrarensetibia1Logan ButteJohn Day FormationWhitneyain
UCMPM2107Diceratheriumniobrarensedistal femur1Seigfried's 4John Day FormationWhitneyain
UW26563Diceratheriumniobrarensedistal metapodial1John Day FormationJohn Day FormationWhitneyain
UW26879Diceratheriumniobrarensedistal metapodial1John Day FormationJohn Day FormationWhitneyain
UW43529Diceratheriumniobrarensemetatarsal1John Day FormationJohn Day FormationWhitneyain
UW52334Diceratheriumniobrarensemetapodial1picture gorgeJohn Day FormationWhitneyain
UW52334Diceratheriumniobrarensedistal metapodial1John Day FormationJohn Day FormationWhitneyain
UW53322Diceratheriumniobrarensemetapodial1picture gorge 16John Day FormationWhitneyain
UW55086Diceratheriumniobrarensemetatarsal1North Wash Level 5John Day FormationWhitneyain
UCMP145Diceratheriumniobrarenseright metatarsal 31John Day Whitneyan GeneralJohn Day FormationWhitneyain
UCMPM1691Diceratheriumniobrarenseleft metapodial1Logan ButteJohn Day FormationWhitneyain
UCMPM1691Diceratheriumniobrarensemetapodial5Logan ButteJohn Day FormationWhitneyain
UW52334Diceratheriumniobrarensephalanx2John Day FormationJohn Day FormationWhitneyain
UW53322Diceratheriumniobrarensephalanx1picture gorge 16John Day FormationWhitneyain
UCMP788Diceratheriumniobrarensephalanx1John Day Whitneyan GeneralJohn Day FormationWhitneyain
UCMP75403Diceratheriumniobrarensemedial phalanx1South Canyon 2John Day FormationWhitneyain
UCMPM1691Diceratheriumniobrarensephalanx3Logan ButteJohn Day FormationWhitneyain
UW52334Diceratheriumniobrarensepodial2John Day FormationJohn Day FormationWhitneyain
UW53322Diceratheriumniobrarensepodial2picture gorge 16John Day FormationWhitneyain
UW54947Diceratheriumniobrarenseastragalus and partial calcanium1picture gorge 8 6' upJohn Day FormationWhitneyain
UW54947Diceratheriumniobrarensepodial2picture gorge 8 6' upJohn Day FormationWhitneyain
UW55086Diceratheriumniobrarensepodial2North Wash Level 5John Day FormationWhitneyain
UW75665Diceratheriumniobrarensedistal podial1picture gorge 29John Day FormationWhitneyain
UCMP788Diceratheriumniobrarensetarsal1John Day Whitneyan GeneralJohn Day FormationWhitneyain
UCMP75033Diceratheriumniobrarensenavicular1South Canyon 2John Day FormationWhitneyain
UCMP75035Diceratheriumniobrarenselunar1South Canyon 2John Day FormationWhitneyain
UCMP75120Diceratheriumniobrarenseastragalus1South Canyon 2John Day FormationWhitneyain
UCMP76104Diceratheriumniobrarensepodial2South Canyon 2John Day FormationWhitneyain
UCMP75260Diceratheriumniobrarensepodial1South Canyon 2John Day FormationWhitneyain
UCMP75348Diceratheriumniobrarensemiddle podial1South Canyon 2John Day FormationWhitneyain
UCMP76104Diceratheriumniobrarenseright podial1South Canyon 2John Day FormationWhitneyain
UCMPM1691Diceratheriumniobrarensearticulated astragalus and calcaneum1Logan ButteJohn Day FormationWhitneyain
UW58755Diceratheriumniobrarensecentrum1Blue CanyonJohn Day FormationWhitneyain
UCMP22552Aphelopsmutilisleft femur1Coffee Ranch Quarry 2Ogalla GroupHemphilian
UCMP30166Aphelopsmutilistibia1Higgins Quarry AOgalla GroupHemphilian
UCMP30266Aphelopsmutilisdist end of ulna1Coffee Ranch Quarry 2Ogalla GroupHemphilian
UCMP30266Aphelopsmutilisdistal humerus1Coffee Ranch Quarry 2Ogalla GroupHemphilian
UCMP30266Aphelopsmutilisleft femur1Coffee Ranch Quarry 2Ogalla GroupHemphilian
UCMP30266Aphelopsmutilispartial distal tibia1Coffee Ranch Quarry 2Ogalla GroupHemphilian
UCMP30266Aphelopsmutilispatella1Coffee Ranch Quarry 2Ogalla GroupHemphilian
UCMP30266Aphelopsmutilistibia2Coffee Ranch Quarry 2Ogalla GroupHemphilian
UCMP30266Aphelopsmutilisulna2Coffee Ranch Quarry 2Ogalla GroupHemphilian
UCMP30267Aphelopsmutilispartial distal tibia1Coffee Ranch Quarry 2Ogalla GroupHemphilian
UCMP30267Aphelopsmutilispatella1Coffee Ranch Quarry 2Ogalla GroupHemphilian
UCMP30268Aphelopsmutilispatella1Coffee Ranch Quarry 2Ogalla GroupHemphilian
UCMP30612Aphelopsmutilisfemur1Higgins Quarry AOgalla GroupHemphilian
UCMP30613Aphelopsmutilishumerus1Higgins Quarry AOgalla GroupHemphilian
UCMP31117Aphelopsmutilisulna1Coffee Ranch Quarry 2Ogalla GroupHemphilian
UCMP31118Aphelopsmutilistibia1Coffee Ranch Quarry 2Ogalla GroupHemphilian
UCMP31119Aphelopsmutilishumerus1Coffee Ranch Quarry 2Ogalla GroupHemphilian
UCMP31120Aphelopsmutilishumerus1Coffee Ranch Quarry 2Ogalla GroupHemphilian
UCMP31121Aphelopsmutilishumerus1Coffee Ranch Quarry 2Ogalla GroupHemphilian
UCMP31122Aphelopsmutilishumerus1Coffee Ranch Quarry 2Ogalla GroupHemphilian
UCMP31127Aphelopsmutilispatella1Coffee Ranch Quarry 2Ogalla GroupHemphilian
UCMP31128Aphelopsmutilispatella1Coffee Ranch Quarry 2Ogalla GroupHemphilian
UCMP31129Aphelopsmutilispatella1Coffee Ranch Quarry 2Ogalla GroupHemphilian
UCMP30266Aphelopsmutilispartial metacarpal4Coffee Ranch Quarry 2Ogalla GroupHemphilian
UCMP30266Aphelopsmutilismetacarpal5Coffee Ranch Quarry 2Ogalla GroupHemphilian
UCMP31123Aphelopsmutilismetacarpal3Coffee Ranch Quarry 2Ogalla GroupHemphilian
UCMP32066Aphelopsmutilismetatarsal11Coffee Ranch Quarry 2Ogalla GroupHemphilian
UCMP32067Aphelopsmutilismetatarsal3Coffee Ranch Quarry 2Ogalla GroupHemphilian
UCMP32068Aphelopsmutilismetatarsal3Coffee Ranch Quarry 2Ogalla GroupHemphilian
UCMP30266Aphelopsmutilisphalanx 31Coffee Ranch Quarry 2Ogalla GroupHemphilian
UCMP30267Aphelopsmutilisphalanx1Coffee Ranch Quarry 2Ogalla GroupHemphilian
UCMP30268Aphelopsmutilisphalanx1Coffee Ranch Quarry 2Ogalla GroupHemphilian
UCMP30269Aphelopsmutilisphalanx1Coffee Ranch Quarry 2Ogalla GroupHemphilian
UCMP30270Aphelopsmutilisphalanx1Coffee Ranch Quarry 2Ogalla GroupHemphilian
UCMP30271Aphelopsmutilisphalanx1Coffee Ranch Quarry 2Ogalla GroupHemphilian
UCMP30272Aphelopsmutilisphalanx1Coffee Ranch Quarry 2Ogalla GroupHemphilian
UCMP30273Aphelopsmutilisphalanx1Coffee Ranch Quarry 2Ogalla GroupHemphilian
UCMP30274Aphelopsmutilisphalanx1Coffee Ranch Quarry 2Ogalla GroupHemphilian
UCMP30275Aphelopsmutilisphalanx1Coffee Ranch Quarry 2Ogalla GroupHemphilian
UCMP31127Aphelopsmutilisphalanx1Coffee Ranch Quarry 2Ogalla GroupHemphilian
UCMP31128Aphelopsmutilisphalanx1Coffee Ranch Quarry 2Ogalla GroupHemphilian
UCMP31129Aphelopsmutilisphalanx1Coffee Ranch Quarry 2Ogalla GroupHemphilian
UCMP31130Aphelopsmutilisphalanx1Coffee Ranch Quarry 2Ogalla GroupHemphilian
UCMP31131Aphelopsmutilisphalanx1Coffee Ranch Quarry 2Ogalla GroupHemphilian
UCMP31132Aphelopsmutilisphalanx1Coffee Ranch Quarry 2Ogalla GroupHemphilian
UCMP31133Aphelopsmutilisphalanx1Coffee Ranch Quarry 2Ogalla GroupHemphilian
UCMP30266Aphelopsmutiliscarpals6Coffee Ranch Quarry 2Ogalla GroupHemphilian
UCMP30266Aphelopsmutilisright calcaneum1Coffee Ranch Quarry 2Ogalla GroupHemphilian
UCMP30266Aphelopsmutiliscarpal1Coffee Ranch Quarry 2Ogalla GroupHemphilian
UCMP30266Aphelopsmutilistarsal1Coffee Ranch Quarry 2Ogalla GroupHemphilian
UCMP30267Aphelopsmutiliscalcaneum1Coffee Ranch Quarry 3Ogalla GroupHemphilian
UCMP30267Aphelopsmutilistarsal1Coffee Ranch Quarry 4Ogalla GroupHemphilian
UCMP30268Aphelopsmutilistarsal1Coffee Ranch Quarry 5Ogalla GroupHemphilian
UCMP30269Aphelopsmutilistarsal1Coffee Ranch Quarry 6Ogalla GroupHemphilian
UCMP30270Aphelopsmutilistarsal1Coffee Ranch Quarry 7Ogalla GroupHemphilian
UCMP31124Aphelopsmutilisastragalus1Coffee Ranch Quarry 2Ogalla GroupHemphilian
UCMP31125Aphelopsmutilisastragalus1Coffee Ranch Quarry 2Ogalla GroupHemphilian
UCMP31125Aphelopsmutiliscalcaneum1Coffee Ranch Quarry 2Ogalla GroupHemphilian
UCMP31125Aphelopsmutiliscalcaneum1Coffee Ranch Quarry 2Ogalla GroupHemphilian
UCMP31126Aphelopsmutiliscalcaneum1Coffee Ranch Quarry 2Ogalla GroupHemphilian
UCMP31127Aphelopsmutiliscalcaneum1Coffee Ranch Quarry 2Ogalla GroupHemphilian
UCMP31127Aphelopsmutiliscarpal9Coffee Ranch Quarry 2Ogalla GroupHemphilian
UCMP31128Aphelopsmutilistarsal1Coffee Ranch Quarry 2Ogalla GroupHemphilian
UCMP32066Aphelopsmutilispodial1Coffee Ranch Quarry 2Ogalla GroupHemphilian
UO2772Teleocerashicksidistal humerus1McKay Reservoir 1ShutlerHemphilian
UO4163Teleocerashicksiproximal radius1McKay Reservoir 1ShutlerHemphilian
UO9634Teleocerashicksiulna1McKay Reservoir 1ShutlerHemphilian
UO17071Teleocerashicksiulna1McKay Reservoir 1ShutlerHemphilian
UO17075Teleocerashicksiulna1McKay Reservoir 1ShutlerHemphilian
UO49287Teleocerashicksidistal humerus1McKay Reservoir 1ShutlerHemphilian
UCMP113504Teleocerashicksihumerus1McKay Reservoir 1ShutlerHemphilian
UCMP113507Teleocerashicksitibiofibula1McKay Reservoir 1ShutlerHemphilian
UCMP113507Teleocerashicksipartial ulna1McKay Reservoir 1ShutlerHemphilian
UCMP113518Teleocerashicksitibia1McKay Reservoir 1ShutlerHemphilian
UCMP113519Teleocerashicksidistal humerus1McKay Reservoir 1ShutlerHemphilian
UCMP113519Teleocerashicksipartial ulna1McKay Reservoir 1ShutlerHemphilian
UCMP113519Teleocerashicksiproximal humerus1McKay Reservoir 1ShutlerHemphilian
UCMP113526Teleocerashicksidistal humerus1McKay Reservoir 1ShutlerHemphilian
UCMP303Teleocerashicksimetapodial1McKay Reservoir 2RattlesnakeHemphilian
UCMP306Teleocerashicksimetapodial1McKay Reservoir 3RattlesnakeHemphilian
UCMP474Teleocerashicksidistal metapodial1McKay Reservoir 4MascallBarstovian
UCMP475Teleocerashicksimetapodial1McKay Reservoir 5MascallBarstovian
UCMP477Teleocerashicksimetapodial1McKay Reservoir 6RattlesnakeHemphilian
UO5056Teleocerashicksimetapodial1McKay Reservoir 7ShutlerHemphilian
UO8049Teleocerashicksimetapodial1McKay Reservoir 8ShutlerHemphilian
UO8053Teleocerashicksimetapodial1McKay Reservoir 9ShutlerHemphilian
UO8142Teleocerashicksimetapodial1McKay Reservoir 10ShutlerHemphilian
UCMP23181Teleocerashicksimetacarpal 31McKay Reservoir 11Rattlesnake 11Hemphilian
UCMP23182Teleocerashicksimetatarsal 31McKay Reservoir 3Rattlesnake 11Hemphilian
UCMP113514Teleocerashicksimetapodial1McKay Reservoir 4ShutlerHemphilian
UCMP113517Teleocerashicksimetapodial1McKay Reservoir 1ShutlerHemphilian
UCMP113520Teleocerashicksimetapodial1McKay Reservoir 1ShutlerHemphilian
UCMP113521Teleocerashicksimetapodial1McKay Reservoir 1ShutlerHemphilian
UCMP113522Teleocerashicksimetapodial1McKay Reservoir 1ShutlerHemphilian
UCMP113523Teleocerashicksimetapodial1McKay Reservoir 1ShutlerHemphilian
UCMP113524Teleocerashicksimetapodial1McKay Reservoir 1ShutlerHemphilian
UO10829Teleocerashicksiphalanx1McKay Reservoir 1ShutlerHemphilian
UCMP113505Teleocerashicksiphalanx1McKay Reservoir 1ShutlerHemphilian
UCMP113506Teleocerashicksiphalanx1McKay Reservoir 1ShutlerHemphilian
UCMP113509Teleocerashicksiphalanx1McKay Reservoir 1ShutlerHemphilian
UO2094Teleocerashicksicalcaneum1McKay Reservoir 1ShutlerHemphilian
UO4136Teleocerashicksipodial1McKay Reservoir 1ShutlerHemphilian
UO4167Teleocerashicksipodial1McKay Reservoir 1ShutlerHemphilian
UO8054Teleocerashicksiastragalus1McKay Reservoir 1ShutlerHemphilian
UO17063Teleocerashicksipodial1McKay Reservoir 1ShutlerHemphilian
UO21886Teleocerashicksiastragalus1McKay Reservoir 1ShutlerHemphilian
UCMP23178Teleocerashicksilunar1McKay Reservoir 2Rattlesnake 16Hemphilian
UCMP23179Teleocerashicksicalcanium1McKay Reservoir 3RattlesnakeHemphilian
UCMP113510Teleocerashicksipisiform1McKay Reservoir 4ShutlerHemphilian
UCMP113511Teleocerashicksicarpal1McKay Reservoir 1ShutlerHemphilian
UCMP113512Teleocerashicksipodial1McKay Reservoir 1ShutlerHemphilian
UCMP113513Teleocerashicksipodial1McKay Reservoir 1ShutlerHemphilian
UCMP113514Teleocerashicksicarpal1McKay Reservoir 1ShutlerHemphilian
UCMP113515Teleocerashicksipisiform1McKay Reservoir 1ShutlerHemphilian
UCMP113516Teleocerashicksipodial1McKay Reservoir 1ShutlerHemphilian
UCMP113519Teleocerashicksipodial4McKay Reservoir 1ShutlerHemphilian
UCMP113523Teleocerashicksicarpal1McKay Reservoir 1ShutlerHemphilian
UO10397/ 5703Teleocerashicksipodial1McKay Reservoir 1ShutlerHemphilian
UCMP113519Teleocerashicksipodial3McKay Reservoir 1ShutlerHemphilian
UOG1675Teleocerashicksicalcaneum1McKay Reservoir 1ShutlerHemphilian
UOG1676Teleocerashicksiastragalus1McKay Reservoir 1ShutlerHemphilian
UO4184Teleocerashicksiaxis1McKay Reservoir 1ShutlerHemphilian
UO25504Teleocerashicksiaxis1McKay Reservoir 1ShutlerHemphilian
UO8055TeleocerashicksiNA1McKay Reservoir 1ShutlerHemphilian
AMNH27757Dicerosbicornismetapodial9KenyaNARecent
AMNH27757Dicerosbicornispatella2KenyaNARecent
AMNH27757Dicerosbicorniscalcaneum1KenyaNARecent
AMNH27757Dicerosbicornispodial16KenyaNARecent
AMNH27757Dicerosbicornispisiform1KenyaNARecent
AMNH27757Dicerosbicornisphalanx24KenyaNARecent
AMNH27757Dicerosbicornishumerus1KenyaNARecent
AMNH27757Dicerosbicornisradius1KenyaNARecent
AMNH27757Dicerosbicornisulna2KenyaNARecent
AMNH27757Dicerosbicornisscapula1KenyaNARecent
AMNH27757Dicerosbicornisfemur1KenyaNARecent
AMNH27757Dicerosbicornistibia1KenyaNARecent
AMNH27757Dicerosbicornisfibula1KenyaNARecent
AMNH81805Dicerosbicornisulna2South AfricaNARecent
AMNH81805Dicerosbicornisradius1South AfricaNARecent
AMNH81805Dicerosbicornispodial1South AfricaNARecent
AMNH81805Dicerosbicorniscalcaneum1South AfricaNARecent
AMNH81805Dicerosbicornismetapodial1South AfricaNARecent
AMNH34739Dicerosbicornisscapula1KenyaNARecent
AMNH34740Dicerosbicornistibia (juvenile)1KenyaNARecent
AMNH34740Dicerosbicornismetapodial (juvenile)1KenyaNARecent
AMNH34740Dicerosbicorniscalcaneum (juvenile)1KenyaNARecent
AMNH14136Dicerosbicornismetapodial1NANARecent
AMNH113779Dicerosbicornisfemur (fetal)1NANARecent
AMNH113779Dicerosbicornistibia (fetal)1NANARecent
AMNH113779Dicerosbicornisscapula (fetal)1NANARecent

Abbreviations: AMNH = American Museum of Natural History, UCMP = The University of California Museum of Paleontology, OU = The University of Oregon, UW = The University of Washington. A more detailed form of this table can be found in the supporting information.

Summary of species in this study and related age ranges, mass, number of identified specimens (NISP), minimum number of individuals (MNI), and the geological formation the fossils are associated with. Data compiled from Fortelius and Kappelman [24], Cerdeño [8, 10], Prothero [5], Mendoza [25], and Owen-Smith [26]. Mass Estimate M1-3 Length from Radinsky 1967 [23] for H. eximius and Prothero [5] for the rest. Abbreviations: AMNH = American Museum of Natural History, UCMP = The University of California Museum of Paleontology, OU = The University of Oregon, UW = The University of Washington. A more detailed form of this table can be found in the supporting information. Phylogenetic Data, R scripts and digital photographs associated with this study are available at Morphobank (project ID: 1238) [27] with permission from The American Museum of Natural History, The University of Washington Burke Museum, The University of Oregon Museum of Natural and Cultural History, and The University of Texas Jackson School of Geosciences Vertebrate Paleontology Laboratory. Digital photographs of fossils from the UCMP are also available through the Calphotos archive (http://calphotos.berkeley.edu/). S1 File of raw pathology scores available online through PLoS One.

Study Species

Hyrachyus eximius, (50.5–45.4 Ma) (Fig 1) is a sister lineage of both the tapir and rhinos. This species is estimated to have weighed around 36.3 kg (equivalent in mass to a large dog), lacked horns, and was a cursorial browser [11, 23]. The rhinocerotid with the earliest first appearance datum (FAD) included in this study is the basal rhinocerotid Trigonias osborni. T. osborni also lacked horns and was substantially larger than H. eximius at about 677 kg [24,25]. T. osborni is known from the Chadronian (37.2 to 33.9 Ma) and was a cursorial browser.
Fig 1

Time-calibrated phylogeny of rhinocerotid taxa used in this study with outgroup H. eximius.

The thicker bars indicate the actual first and last appearance data (FAD and LAD) of the fossil localities included, not the comprehensive range of the species. D. bicornis has no blue line because only modern bones were examined. Tree was pruned from Cerdeño’s 1998 [10] morphologic phylogeny or Rhinocerotidae and time-calibrated in RStudio using the ‘equal’ setting in the function timePaleoPhy() in the software package ‘Paleotree’ [28]. Tree was set to be fully dichotomous and to extend all the way to the LAD.

Time-calibrated phylogeny of rhinocerotid taxa used in this study with outgroup H. eximius.

The thicker bars indicate the actual first and last appearance data (FAD and LAD) of the fossil localities included, not the comprehensive range of the species. D. bicornis has no blue line because only modern bones were examined. Tree was pruned from Cerdeño’s 1998 [10] morphologic phylogeny or Rhinocerotidae and time-calibrated in RStudio using the ‘equal’ setting in the function timePaleoPhy() in the software package ‘Paleotree’ [28]. Tree was set to be fully dichotomous and to extend all the way to the LAD. Menoceras arikarense emigrated from Europe in the late Oligocene or early Miocene (24.8–20.43 Ma) and had a mass around 375 kg [24,25]. M. arikarense is notable for two firsts: horns and grazing [5]. Diceratherium niobrarense is larger than M. arikarense (about 1010 kg [5]). Although D. niobrarense also displays laterally paired rostral horns, it is thought be descended from Subhyracodon and is not considered a sister group of M. arikarense [5,18]. This rhinocerotid was present in North America in the early and middle Miocene (24.8–20.43 Ma) and was probably a browser [5]. Both M. arikarense and D. niobrarense show morphologies characteristic of increased graviportality: increased bone robusticity, more vertically-oriented pelvis [26], and widening rib cage [5]. Limb length also decreased relative to mass [5]. Aphelops mutilis and Teleoceras hicksi are similar to modern rhinos in graviportal morphology and robust limbs [5]. A. mutilis was a hornless aceratheriine browser known from the mid-Miocene to the beginning of the Pliocene (10.3–4.9 Ma) and is estimated to have weighed around 1840 kg. T. hicksi (10.3–4.9 Ma) is morphologically similar to aquatic hippos [5], but has highly hypsodont teeth [5] with enamel oxygen isotope ratios similar to terrestrial herbivores [29]. T. hicksi is estimated to have weighed around 1660 kg, is thought to have a small nasal horn and is one of the last rhinocerotids in the North American fossil record [30]. From the five modern taxa we examined in planning this study we chose Diceros bicornis (the black rhino) as the modern exemplar. Diceros (5.3332 Ma to present) weighs 800–1,350 kg [24] and is a browser with a prehensile lip specialized to grab foliage [26].

Data Collection Procedure

Diagnosing specific diseases from osteopathologies (often the only pathologies available for study in fossil taxa) is difficult, but not impossible. Certain recognized diseases and disorders can leave distinctive features; e.g., six fingers in a human skeleton are an indicator of polydactyly. The majority of diseases display a common range of pathologies and it is these unique combinations of pathologies that are most informative. For example, irregular holes in a bone can be caused by abnormal nutrient canals, bone infection, soft-tissue swelling, or preservation damage. Arthritis may cause bones to form these irregular holes as well as bone exostoses or thinning, lipping, and fibrous, candlewax, and lumpy bone textures. Arthritis is often labeled spondylarthropathy in non-human paleopathologic studies [17,31] to acknowledge that arthritis itself is not a specific disease, but can be caused by a range of environmental, genetic, and behavioral factors depending on the system under study [16,18,19]. Each specimen was digitally photographed with a Nikon D90 camera. The camera was hand held approximately perpendicular to the photographic plane. Elongate fossils (e.g. femora or metapodials) were photographed in lateral view and fossils with irregular shapes (i.e. podials) were oriented in medial view. Proximal and distal articular surfaces were photographed as well for limb and foot elements. Vertebral elements were photographed in dorsal, ventral, proximal, and distal views. Extra photos were taken if a unique pathology was observed or for striking examples of specific pathologies. The specimen number and corresponding photo numbers were recorded digitally and associated with a pathology index scoring and any qualitative observations (see supporting information). The presence or absence of pathology was recorded on site, while pathology severity scorings were determined from the digital photographs. We quantitatively described the visible surface of each bone using a category, or binning, system. We sorted our initial qualitative descriptions of possible symptoms of disease into seven different categories. The seven categories were divided into ranks from 1 (regular bone) to 4 (severe) (Fig 2). These ranks are artificial, but should allow for consistent scoring. All scoring was completed by the first author. The seven categories are exostoses, lipping, bone texture, cavitation, foramen shape, foramen size, and articular surface modification. All categories except for ‘articular surface’ refer to the nonarticular surfaces of the bones. The categories were chosen following the methodology of Aufderheide [16], Rothschild [17, 31], and Bartosiewicz et al. [21]. Analogs of this procedure have been used for decades in anthropologic [21, 22, 32] and modern cattle [21] studies. Our goal was to quantitatively describe all irregularities observed in the osteology of the Rhinocerotidae, even if they could not immediately be categorized as a pathology.
Fig 2

Index of Pathology (IPa) used in this study.

Examples of each pathology category and the 1–4 rating system are given along with a short description.

Index of Pathology (IPa) used in this study.

Examples of each pathology category and the 1–4 rating system are given along with a short description.

Category One: Exostoses

Exostoses are formations of new bone on the surface of a bone, caused by inflammation of the periosteum. Extoses appear as bumps or protuberances on an area of the bone that is expected to be smooth or relatively flat. This category includes ossification of the periosteum, ligaments, or muscle. Bones in rank one do not exhibit any exostoses. Bones in rank two show minor irregular bulging of bone. Bones in rank three show clear protrusions of irregular bone. Bones in rank four show a continuous irregular distortion of the non-articular surface of the bone.

Category Two: Lipping

Lipping occurs when osteophytes (commonly referred to as bone spurs) form as new bone on the margin of articular surfaces. They usually form as a series of merging osteophytes around the joint margin, but can occur singly as well. Bones in rank one do not exhibit any lipping. Bones in rank two show slight bulging of the bone adjacent to the articular surface. Bones in rank three show bulging of the bone surrounding the articular surface to the point where a prominent shelf is beginning to form. Bones in rank four show a prominent shelf adjacent to the articular surface. The shelf may be regular or irregular.

Category Three: Textures

Bone constantly remodels and rebuilds itself in response to localized stress. This can result in characteristic external textures. Care must be taken to not conflate exostoses (which has more to do with shape) with texture. Bones in rank one have a smooth texture. Bones in rank two have an elevated linear texture, termed fibrous. Bones in rank three have an elevated linear texture that is slightly bulging or uneven texture, likened to candle wax. Bones in rank four have an elevated, uneven, nonlinear texture.

Category Four: Cavitation

Cavitation is the first category concerned with loss of bone. A cavitation is a hole in the bone, usually caused by infection and/or decreased blood flow. Unlike the categories of foramen shape and size, these are relatively large areas of the bone that cannot be confused with vascularization. Bones in rank one do not exhibit any cavitation. Bones in rank two show a pockmarked appearance where the bone has lost integrity. Bones in rank three show small cavities. Bones in rank four show large cavities that may be linked together.

Category Five: Articular Surface

The articular surface forms the bony portion of a joint. Bones in rank one do not show any irregularities in the joint surface. Bones in rank two show a pockmarked appearance where the cartilage has been worn away. Bones in rank three show bone loss on the articular surface. Bones in rank four show eburnation of the articular surface and/or osteophyte formation.

Category Six: Foramen Shape

We found bone cysts can easily be confounded with vascularization (called ‘lucencies’ in Regnault et al. 2–13 [13]), so we decided to describe the degree of foramen deformation instead of labeling all foramina as cysts. Cysting (pockets or holes where localized infections occurred [16,18]) was divided into two categories (foramen shape and size). Rank one consists of circular foramina on the surface of the bone. Rank two consists of elongate or ovoid foramina. Rank three consists of elongate foramina that are irregularly ovoid, but still linear. Rank four consists of irregular, nonlinear (or bent) foramina.

Category Seven: Foramen Size

Rank one consists of foramina of approximately the same size. Rank two consists of foramina which show little variation in size relative to one another. Rank three consists of foramina which show moderate variation in size relative to one another. Rank four consists of foramina which show a high degrees of variation in size relative to one another. Each bone was also classified as appendicular and axial. To explore whether there were any overt patters of regionalization in pathological expression, all appendicular elements were then divided into the functional categories: hindlimb or forelimb, and also developmental categories: girdle, stylopod, autopod, zeugopod. The overall percent expression of each category was tabulated and then compared relative to the total number of appendicular element.

Data Analysis

Each fossil was given a score of 1–4 for each pathology, and these scores were then averaged for each taxon and pathological category, yielding 49 results. These averaged scores were then added together for each taxon (i.e. the seven pathology categories were added together for each taxon) to create an index of pathology (IPa). The minimum score possible would therefore be seven (all pathological categories in a taxon having a score of one) and the maximum would be twenty-eight (all pathological categories in a taxon having a score of four). These average scores for each taxon do not behave as ordinal data, because they are subject to the central limit of means. That is, species averages of non-continuous data behave like continuous data, especially with large sample sizes. The smallest number of specimens we analyzed for one species was 65, more than adequate to produce this effect. Consequently, we decided it was appropriate to analyze these values using continuous-data approaches: linear regression and independent contrasts. We tested whether mass was associated with increased osteopathologic expression in two ways. First, we ran a series of linear regressions in JMP [33] with estimated mass against each individual categorical score as well as the total index. Mass estimates for extinct taxa were calculated using the total molar length (M1-3) [34] from Radinsky 1967 for Hyrachyus eximius [23] and Prothero 2005 [5] for all other extinct taxa, which we found to be the most reliable of available body mass estimators. Other available proxies (femur length and humerus width) produced unreasonable mass estimates [35] for one or more of the included taxa, likely as a result of the changing degree of graviportality through the history of the rhino lineage. The second test used Felsenstein’s [36] independent contrast (IC) method to examine the influence of shared ancestry on the relationship between mass and pathology. We constructed a fully resolved tree of just the taxa in our study by paring down the results of Cerdeño 1995 [8]. The tree was time-calibrated in RStudio [37] using the packages ‘ape’ [38] and ‘paleotree’ [28] with paleotree’s function TimePaleoPhy. The r code is available in the S2 File. We used the ‘Equal’ method within TimePaleoPhy, which prevents zero-length branches, and the setting ‘add.term = TRUE’, which gave us branch lengths that took LAD into consideration. FAD and LAD for the Equal method were determined by the temporal extent of the formation at the locality where the fossils were excavated. To implement the IC method, we used the package ‘ape’ [38], to calculate the absolute values of the difference for each pair of nodes for both mass and all seven types of pathologies, as well as for the overall IPa, under a Brownian Motion model. The resulting contrasts for pathologic values were regressed against the contrast for the mass values. The r-squared and p-values for the non-phylogenetic linear regression versus the IC regression analysis were then compared.

Results

Overall, geologically older taxa show the smallest relative abundance of pathologic elements, while the greatest pathologic expression was seen in the more derived taxa, which were also the most massive taxa sampled in North America. The one exception is the extant species, D. bicornis, which appears later, yet is less massive and less pathologic overall than A. mutilis and T. hicksi. When taxa are considered separately, H. eximius displayed low osteopathologic expression (~28%), most of which was expressed as cysting and exostoses in the podials. T. osborni and D. niobrarense also displayed a greater degree of pathologic expression in the distal elements. The M. arikarense fossil assemblage displayed prominent exostoses. In smaller elements (i.e. podials) the non-articular surfaces would be almost entirely composed of exostoses. A. mutilis and T. hicksi commonly contained large visible cysts and rank three, candlewax, bone texture. Only two fossils displayed eburnation, in A. mutilis on the articular surfaces of a proximal tibia (UCMP F-30266) and in T. hicksi on a distal humerus (UO F-2772). A. mutilis also had the highest percent expression of any one pathology (in this case, foramen shape), while D. bicornis had comparatively more foramen variation adjacent to the articular surfaces and fewer exostoses than the other robust taxa. One specimen (VPL M-8259) had flat ‘rice grain’ crystals on the proximal articular surface of right radius and ulna, as well as the distal articular surface of the humerus, a possible indication of gout [16, 18]. Tendon ossification was only seen in A. mutilis and T. hicksi. Of note, most of the articular surfaces of the synovial joints in both extinct and extant taxa appeared smooth and free of damage. Overall index of pathology (IPa) scores were between 8 and 18, Table 3. The two oldest lineages, H. eximius and T. osborni, had an overall pathologic score of 8.8 and 11.06 respectively. The next oldest lineage, D. niobrarense, had an overall score of 12.81, while M. arikarense had an overall score of 13.31. T. hicksi had an overall score of 14.26, while A. mutilis had an overall score of 17.57. The modern rhino, D. bicornis, had an overall IPa of 12.23.
Table 3

Frequency of Pathology Scores and IPa grouped by Osteopathologies per Taxa.

ExostosesLippingAbnormal Bone TextureCavitationForamen ShapeForamen SizeArticular SurfaceOverall
H. eximius12613452563072771585792183
2127461258110229216789
330941315145
400000000
IPa1.351.111.361.191.321.401.078.80
T. osborni119781786565295403
288348117504216328
3721511820366
400100001
IPa1.901.3321.341.581.721.1911.06
M. arikarense11259945211065221
258325921432621260
3211232626536156
410102307
IPa2.181.372.161.772.012.511.3113.31
D. niobrarense11433336252652200
241364524332920245
3196231417203122
4104100033
IPa2.101.612.381.691.851.881.3112.81
A. mutilis106110353073182
247494419251239235
373205344817410355
4111233322451136
IPa2.691.752.962.542.863.261.5317.57
T. hicksi112549279970190
234263436332010193
3312371838462174
4502127017
IPa2.491.372.431.822.42.591.16914.26
D. bicornis1164796214768298
25626461337337218
3321402435078
400600006
IPa1.831.42.231.172.132.371.0912.23

IPa = Index of Pathology, the average of all pathology scores (1 through 4) for all the individuals of a given taxa. Overall IPa is the sum of the seven individual averages. Frequency is unbolded, IPa is bolded.

IPa = Index of Pathology, the average of all pathology scores (1 through 4) for all the individuals of a given taxa. Overall IPa is the sum of the seven individual averages. Frequency is unbolded, IPa is bolded. When we regressed mass for each taxon against each of the seven osteopathology categories Table 4, four of the pathologies (exostoses, abnormal textures, foramen shape, and foramen size variation) had p-values less than or equal to 0.05. A linear correlation of mass against the overall pathologic scores was found to be significant (p = 0.04) and accounted for about 52% of the variation (r2 adj.). The IC analysis comparing mass and the seven osteopathology categories was also significant (p ≤ 0.05) for the both foramen shape and the overall pathologic index, with mass accounting for 42% of the overall variation.
Table 4

Linear Regression and Independent Contrast Regression against Mass.

Overall IndexExostosesLippingAbnormal Bone TextureCavitationForamen ShapeForamen SizeArticular Surface
Linear ContrastsR2 Adj0.51990.47720.23890.6590.33250.64210.4797-0.11
F7.4986.4772.88412.63.98811.766.5320.4056
P0.040870.051580.15020.01640.10230.018640.050910.5522
Independent ContrastsR2 Adj0.42350.4011-0.010150.52360.20230.52630.3932-0.1356
F5.4085.0180.9397705952.5227.6664.8880.2836
P0.037590.075220.37690.040030.17310.039420.078020.6171

Linear Regression and Independent Contrast Regression Statistics against Mass. R2-adjusted, F Statistic and P values for linear and independent contrast (IC) regressions for each category of pathology are included.

Linear Regression and Independent Contrast Regression Statistics against Mass. R2-adjusted, F Statistic and P values for linear and independent contrast (IC) regressions for each category of pathology are included. We were also interested in testing whether certain bones or regions of the appendicular skeleton (which comprises the majority of the data) displayed a greater amount of pathology than other bones or regions of the appendicular skeleton. We divided all appendicular elements into the functional categories: hindlimb or forelimb (Fig 3), and also developmental categories: girdle, stylopod, zeugopod, autopod (Fig 4). For example, if the stresses generating the osteopathology were greater in the distal parts of the limb, one might expect greater pathology in the autopod (manus and pes) than the stylopod (humerus and femur). We found no significant difference in pathological expression between different regions of the appendicular skeleton.
Fig 3

Comparison of the forelimb and hindlimb.

A color spectrum is used to indicate the percent of elements displaying any osteopathology in the forelimb and hindlimb, respectively. The closer to the red portion of the color spectrum, the higher percentage. The closer to the violet portion of the color spectrum, the lower the percentage. Rhino figures do not display relative size.

Fig 4

Comparison of limb regions.

A color spectrum is used to indicate the percent of elements displaying any osteopathology in the stylopod, zeugopod, and autopod regions, respectively. The closer to the red portion of the color spectrum, the higher percentage. The closer to the violet portion of the color spectrum, the lower the percentage. Rhino figures do not display relative size.

Comparison of the forelimb and hindlimb.

A color spectrum is used to indicate the percent of elements displaying any osteopathology in the forelimb and hindlimb, respectively. The closer to the red portion of the color spectrum, the higher percentage. The closer to the violet portion of the color spectrum, the lower the percentage. Rhino figures do not display relative size.

Comparison of limb regions.

A color spectrum is used to indicate the percent of elements displaying any osteopathology in the stylopod, zeugopod, and autopod regions, respectively. The closer to the red portion of the color spectrum, the higher percentage. The closer to the violet portion of the color spectrum, the lower the percentage. Rhino figures do not display relative size.

Discussion

In our study we found that mass can explain roughly 50% of the osteopathological expression. A. mutilis, surprisingly, had the highest pathology scores by a wide margin, while T. hicksi, which was close to A. mutilis in estimated mass, had scores similar to the smaller D. niobrarense and M. arikarense. Both the overall expression of pathology and the subcategory of foramen shape were significant when regressed against mass regardless of whether phylogeny was taken into account or not. However, the r2 value in the vicinity of 0.5 suggests that other factors besides mass, such as bone robusticity, cursoriality or environment, could play a significant role in pathological expression. There might be a tradeoff between a lineage increasing in size or weight and abnormal textures, lipping, and other pathologies that intuitively should be selected against on an evolutionary scale. Lower levels of expression (categories 1 and 2) were more common, but no taxon was entirely pathology-free. The ‘maximum operational level’ of different pathologies may be similar or drastically different in different vertebrate lineages, which in turn could lead to diverse selection pressures. Longevity could also be a factor in pathological expression. There is a positive correlation in the Mammalia between body mass and lifespan, although there is a great amount of variation [39]. The larger taxa may be living longer, which could increase the likelihood of osteoarthritis, synovitis, traumatic injury, etc. Captive mammals that live longer than their wild counterparts often display these pathologies [4, 13, 14, 15]. Pathology could be a reflection of ontogeny. However, a longer lifespan does not necessarily increase only the geriatric portion of a mammal’s life. In an animal with a longer lifespan bone would presumably stay healthy for the same proportion of a mammal’s life as the shorter-lived counterpart, but this remains to be tested [40] Our main difficulty in this study was to establish a measurement method for pathology. In anthropology several qualitative and quantitative metrics have been used to study paleopathology [16, 18, 19]; paleontology also has no universal methodology for identifying and analyzing paleopathologies, but several parallel methods [12, 13, 14, 17, 21, 27]. Our method uses a scoring system that is focused on parsing out the severity of symptoms, not direct diagnoses of disease. It is possible to apply these separate pathology categories to studies across the vertebrate kingdom. Comparison of pathological expression between these vastly different taxa could lead to new insights into bone repair, species and lineage-level responses to pathology, and the uniformity of bone-related diseases over time. Synovitis, not arthritis, may be the proximal cause of the pathologies observed. Notably, we found that most of the pathology in the taxa we studied was located immediately adjacent to the articular surface of joints and not in the articular surface itself. That is, the articular surface itself appeared healthy (that is, not scarred or pitted) in all but five individual specimens even in individuals with advanced exostoses and abnormal bone textures. This could indicate that the joints (and therefore the organism) are functional well after pathologies begin to appear and swelling of the synovium caused the observed cortical erosion [16]. The overall picture painted by our results shows a measureable increase in the percentage of elements that display osteopathologies related to arthritis from the older to newer branches in the North American rhinocerotid lineage, consistent with earlier observations [4, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17]. Our initial hypothesis was that more massive rhino species would display a greater frequency of osteopathologies as increased loading pressure on the limbs caused microfractures that resulted in inflammation and abnormal bone textures. With our current sample, we found a significant correlation of pathology with mass, suggesting that increasing size in the lineage was partially responsible for osteopathologies. This study is not powerful enough to conclude if these pathologies are related primarily to arthritis or is a multifactorial response or a range of diseases. Because size increase is a common adaptation in terrestrial herbivores for both eating low-quality diets [26, 41, 42] and resisting predation pressure in open environments [26, 43], it seems that adaptations for food and predator avoidance may incur a cost in bone stress and osteopathology. The accumulation of pathologies in a lineage may no longer be solely a herald of disaster, but of adaptation as well.

Raw pathology Scores for all Rhinocerotidae specimens used in this study.

Picture numbers correspond to digital photographs uploaded to Morphobank (project ID: 1238) [27]. Information available with permission from The American Museum of Natural History, The University of Washington Burke Museum, The University of Oregon Museum of Natural and Cultural History, and The University of Texas Jackson School of Geosciences Vertebrate Paleontology Laboratory. (XLSX) Click here for additional data file.

R Code and Required Files for Analysis.

R Code can be run in RStudio [37] using the packages ‘ape’ [38] and ‘paleotree’ [28] with paleotree’s function TimePaleoPhy. Trees from Cerdeño (1995) [8]. (ZIP) Click here for additional data file.
  12 in total

1.  Patterns of predation in a diverse predator-prey system.

Authors:  A R E Sinclair; Simon Mduma; Justin S Brashares
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-09-18       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Fossil grass anthoecia within miocene rhinoceros skeletons: diet in an extinct species.

Authors:  M R Voorhies; J R Thomasson
Journal:  Science       Date:  1979-10-19       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Evidence for a tradeoff between retention time and chewing efficiency in large mammalian herbivores.

Authors:  Marcus Clauss; Charles Nunn; Julia Fritz; Jürgen Hummel
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 2.320

4.  Ecology and mode-of-life explain lifespan variation in birds and mammals.

Authors:  Kevin Healy; Thomas Guillerme; Sive Finlay; Adam Kane; Seán B A Kelly; Deirdre McClean; David J Kelly; Ian Donohue; Andrew L Jackson; Natalie Cooper
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Origins of spondyloarthropathy in Perissodactyla.

Authors:  B M Rothschild; D R Prothero; C Rothschild
Journal:  Clin Exp Rheumatol       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.473

6.  Degenerative arthritis in a black rhinoceros.

Authors:  J D Wallach
Journal:  J Am Vet Med Assoc       Date:  1967-10-01       Impact factor: 1.936

7.  Phylogenetic relationships of the five extant Rhinoceros species (Rhinocerotidae, Perissodactyla) based on mitochondrial cytochrome b and 12S rRNA genes.

Authors:  C Tougard; T Delefosse; C Hänni; C Montgelard
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.286

8.  Osteopathology in the feet of rhinoceroses: lesion type and distribution.

Authors:  Sophie Regnault; Robert Hermes; Thomas Hildebrandt; John Hutchinson; Renate Weller
Journal:  J Zoo Wildl Med       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 0.776

Review 9.  Tragedy and delight: the ethics of decelerated ageing.

Authors:  David Gems
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  One small step for rhinos, one giant leap for wildlife management--imaging diagnosis of bone pathology in distal limb.

Authors:  Gabriela Galateanu; Thomas B Hildebrandt; Alexis Maillot; Pascal Etienne; Romain Potier; Baptiste Mulot; Joseph Saragusty; Robert Hermes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  3 in total

1.  Correction: Osteopathology in Rhinocerotidae from 50 Million Years to the Present.

Authors:  Kelsey T Stilson; Samantha S B Hopkins; Edward Byrd Davis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Skeletal pathology and variable anatomy in elephant feet assessed using computed tomography.

Authors:  Sophie Regnault; Jonathon J I Dixon; Chris Warren-Smith; John R Hutchinson; Renate Weller
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  Interspecific variation in the limb long bones among modern rhinoceroses-extent and drivers.

Authors:  Christophe Mallet; Raphaël Cornette; Guillaume Billet; Alexandra Houssaye
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 2.984

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.