Literature DB >> 32519813

A first glimpse at the influence of body mass in the morphological integration of the limb long bones: an investigation in modern rhinoceroses.

Christophe Mallet1, Guillaume Billet2, Alexandra Houssaye1, Raphaël Cornette3.   

Abstract

The appendicular skeleton of tetrapods is a particularly integrated structure due to the shared developmental origin or similar functional constraints exerted on its elements. Among these constraints, body mass is considered strongly to influence its integration but its effect on shape covariation has rarely been addressed in mammals, especially in heavy taxa. Here, we propose to explore the covariation patterns of the long bones in heavy animals and their link to body mass. We investigate the five modern rhinoceros species, which display an important range of bodyweight. We used a 3D geometric morphometric approach to describe the shape covariation of the six bones composing the stylopodium and zeugopodium both among and within species. Our results indicate that the appendicular skeleton of modern rhinos is a strongly integrated structure. At the interspecific level, the shape covariation is roughly similar between all pairs of bones and mainly concerns the muscular insertions related to powerful flexion and extension movements. The forelimb integration appears higher and more related to body mass than that of the hind limb, suggesting a specialization for weight support. The integration of the stylopodium elements does not seem to relate to body mass in our sample, which suggests a greater effect of shared developmental factors. Conversely, the covariation of the zeugopodium bones seems more associated with body mass, particularly for the radius-ulna pair. The fibula appears poorly integrated with other bones, especially within non-Rhinoceros species, which may represent a case of parcellation due to a functional dissociation between the hind limb bones. The exploration of the integration patterns at the intraspecific level also highlights a more prominent effect of age over individual body mass on shape covariation within C. simum. This study lends support to previous hypotheses indicating a link between high body mass and high integration level.
© 2020 Anatomical Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Rhinocerotidae; appendicular skeleton; body mass; functional morphology; geometric morphometrics; locomotion; morphological integration

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32519813      PMCID: PMC7495277          DOI: 10.1111/joa.13232

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anat        ISSN: 0021-8782            Impact factor:   2.921


  43 in total

1.  Morphological integration in mammalian limb proportions: dissociation between function and development.

Authors:  Manuela Schmidt; Martin S Fischer
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 2.  Correction for multiple testing: is there a resolution?

Authors:  David L Streiner; Geoffrey R Norman
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 9.410

3.  Patterns of morphological integration in the appendicular skeleton of mammalian carnivores.

Authors:  Alberto Martín-Serra; Borja Figueirido; Juan Antonio Pérez-Claros; Paul Palmqvist
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2015-01-05       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  PHENOTYPIC, GENETIC, AND ENVIRONMENTAL MORPHOLOGICAL INTEGRATION IN THE CRANIUM.

Authors:  James M Cheverud
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Comparative anatomy, evolution, and homologies of tetrapod hindlimb muscles, comparison with forelimb muscles, and deconstruction of the forelimb-hindlimb serial homology hypothesis.

Authors:  Rui Diogo; Julia Molnar
Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)       Date:  2014-04-12       Impact factor: 2.064

6.  Morphological Analysis of Long Bones in Semi-aquatic Mustelids and their Terrestrial Relatives.

Authors:  Léo Botton-Divet; Raphaël Cornette; Anne-Claire Fabre; Anthony Herrel; Alexandra Houssaye
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2016-10-29       Impact factor: 3.326

Review 7.  Canalization, developmental stability, and morphological integration in primate limbs.

Authors:  Benedikt Hallgrímsson; Katherine Willmore; Brian K Hall
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.868

8.  A first glimpse at the influence of body mass in the morphological integration of the limb long bones: an investigation in modern rhinoceroses.

Authors:  Christophe Mallet; Guillaume Billet; Alexandra Houssaye; Raphaël Cornette
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 2.921

9.  Forelimb-hindlimb developmental timing changes across tetrapod phylogeny.

Authors:  Olaf R P Bininda-Emonds; Jonathan E Jeffery; Marcelo R Sánchez-Villagra; James Hanken; Matthew Colbert; Claude Pieau; Lynne Selwood; Carel Ten Cate; Albert Raynaud; Casmile K Osabutey; Michael K Richardson
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2007-10-01       Impact factor: 3.260

Review 10.  Size, shape, and form: concepts of allometry in geometric morphometrics.

Authors:  Christian Peter Klingenberg
Journal:  Dev Genes Evol       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 0.900

View more
  1 in total

1.  A first glimpse at the influence of body mass in the morphological integration of the limb long bones: an investigation in modern rhinoceroses.

Authors:  Christophe Mallet; Guillaume Billet; Alexandra Houssaye; Raphaël Cornette
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 2.921

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.