Literature DB >> 18406906

Quality assurance of intensity-modulated radiation therapy.

Jatinder R Palta1, Chihray Liu, Jonathan G Li.   

Abstract

The current paradigm for the quality assurance (QA) program for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) includes QA of the treatment planning system, QA of the delivery system, and patient-specific QA. Although the IMRT treatment planning and delivery system is the same as for conventional three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy, it has more parameters to coordinate and verify. Because of complex beam intensity modulation, each IMRT field often includes many small irregular off-axis fields, resulting in isodose distributions for each IMRT plan that are more conformal than those from conventional treatment plans. Therefore, these features impose a new and more stringent set of QA requirements for IMRT planning and delivery. The generic test procedures to validate dose calculation and delivery accuracy for both treatment planning and IMRT delivery have to be customized for each type of IMRT planning and delivery strategy. The rationale for such an approach is that the overall accuracy of IMRT delivery is incumbent on the piecewise uncertainties in both the planning and delivery processes. The end user must have well-defined evaluation criteria for each element of the planning and delivery process. Such information can potentially be used to determine a priori the accuracy of IMRT planning and delivery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18406906     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.05.092

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  21 in total

1.  The importance of accurate treatment planning, delivery, and dose verification.

Authors:  Julian Malicki
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2012-03-06

2.  IMRT and IGRT in head and neck cancer: Have we delivered what we promised?

Authors:  Gupta Tejpal; Agarwal Jaiprakash; Bannerjee Susovan; Sarbani Ghosh-Laskar; Vedang Murthy; Ashwini Budrukkar
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-11-21

3.  Dosimetric verification for intensity-modulated arc therapy plans by use of 2D diode array, radiochromic film and radiosensitive polymer gel.

Authors:  Naoki Hayashi; Ryan L Malmin; Yoichi Watanabe
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 2.724

4.  Implementation of the structural SIMilarity (SSIM) index as a quantitative evaluation tool for dose distribution error detection.

Authors:  Jiayuan Peng; Chengyu Shi; Eric Laugeman; Weigang Hu; Zhen Zhang; Sasa Mutic; Bin Cai
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Medical physics aspects of cancer care in the Asia Pacific region: 2011 survey results.

Authors:  T Kron; Ha Azhari; Eo Voon; Ky Cheung; P Ravindran; D Soejoko; K Inamura; Y Han; Nm Ung; L Bold; Um Win; R Srivastava; J Meyer; S Farrukh; L Rodriguez; M Kuo; Jcl Lee; A Kumara; Cc Lee; A Krisanachinda; Xc Nguyen; Kh Ng
Journal:  Biomed Imaging Interv J       Date:  2012-04-01

6.  A probability approach to the study on uncertainty effects on gamma index evaluations in radiation therapy.

Authors:  Francisco Cutanda Henríquez; Silvia Vargas Castrillón
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 2.238

7.  Statistical analysis of IMRT dosimetry quality assurance measurements for local delivery guideline.

Authors:  Jin Beom Chung; Jae Sung Kim; Sung Whan Ha; Sung-Joon Ye
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2011-03-28       Impact factor: 3.481

8.  Eight years of IMRT quality assurance with ionization chambers and film dosimetry: experience of the Montpellier Comprehensive Cancer Center.

Authors:  Pascal Fenoglietto; Benoit Laliberté; Norbert Aillères; Olivier Riou; Jean-Bernard Dubois; David Azria
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 3.481

9.  A comparison of the quality assurance of four dosimetric tools for intensity modulated radiation therapy.

Authors:  Jaeman Son; Taesung Baek; Boram Lee; Dongho Shin; Sung Yong Park; Jeonghoon Park; Young Kyung Lim; Se Byeong Lee; Jooyoung Kim; Myonggeun Yoon
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 2.991

10.  Effects of spatial resolution and noise on gamma analysis for IMRT QA.

Authors:  Jessie Y Huang; Kiley B Pulliam; Elizabeth M McKenzie; David S Followill; Stephen F Kry
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.